Iranian Chill Thread

Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


in short: Iran has not directly blamed any party yet, needs evidence before it makes a formal accusation. most likely form of retaliation: enriching uranium faster and to higher levels --> if IRI is too scared to engage Israel directly, this could be a good time to enrich uranium to 90% at Fordow
Click to expand...

After Fakhrizadeh, enrichment was increased to 60%, just pointing that out.
 
strkyer1982 said:
After Fakhrizadeh, enrichment was increased to 60%, just pointing that out.
Click to expand...
that was blamed on Israel and linked to Iran's nuclear program, this time they want to blame ISIS so it's trickier. I predict probably some missile strikes against ISIS in Syria
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
the saint said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

This is a very generous number, i bet that 5 figures deaths have already been passed
 
Persian Gulf said:
that was blamed on Israel and linked to Iran's nuclear program, this time they want to blame ISIS so it's trickier. I predict probably some missile strikes against ISIS in Syria
Click to expand...
Missile strikes against what positions. They no longer hold ground, theirs nothing to strike. Would be a waste and weak response.

I don't expect a response that will fit the crime regardless. We are very risk adverse, when Fakhrizadeh will killed, the only response should have been on Mossad's HQ. We failed and the price is being paid over and over again.
 
strkyer1982 said:
Missile strikes against what positions. They no longer hold ground, theirs nothing to strike. Would be a waste and weak response.
Click to expand...
ISIS still has some presence in Syria
strkyer1982 said:
I don't expect a response that will fit the crime regardless. We are very risk adverse, when Fakhrizadeh will killed, the only response should have been on Mossad's HQ. We failed and the price is being paid over and over again.
Click to expand...
Agreed, but it started well before Fakhrizadeh. The problem is not just a lack of will to respond but also a lack of ability to respond in kind (covert ops).
 
Persian Gulf said:
ISIS still has some presence in Syria
Click to expand...
They would just be token strikes at the end of the day. Like the ones they plan to do to the Houthis.
Persian Gulf said:
Agreed, but it started well before Fakhrizadeh. The problem is not just a lack of will to respond but also a lack of ability to respond in kind (covert ops).
Click to expand...
Sure.

You'd have to do a hot attack, but that requires serious willpower. After Fakhrizadeh, no one would have blame Iran for doing a selective and surgical mass attack on a few coordinates. This is mostly a willpower problem.

Therefore, what this has shown us is that despite all the advancement, we are not ready or capable of fighting and defeating the Israel-US coalition. therefore, we avoid confrontation at all costs. As a result, they can essentially do what they like.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top