Whatever

Thats what I am trying to warn all of us about.

Don't kill the forum before its started.

Or make it an echo chamber.
No, no echo chamber, b ut surely you don't want to reproduce the stresses and strains of the old place.
 
No, no echo chamber, b ut surely you don't want to reproduce the stresses and strains of the old place.

Which is why I feel we need to step back and see what we might be doing wrong.
 
Thats what I am trying to warn all of us about.

Don't kill the forum before its started.

Or make it an echo chamber.
Hardly, yaar. Begs the question, but, ki what constitutes a breach of community behaviour guidelines.. 🤔

I got warned for saying 'Rahul ghandy'.. I'd like to appeal against my conviction, take it to a higher court... a sentencing most unfair and reeking of bias.

Baaki bhi saarey nationalist broskis languishing in forum jail. Good company, POWs, brothers in arms.
 
OK.
Comments welcome.
Tell, no.

My general thoughts are already on Waz's thread today.

This system, as I've said here, will simply not work.

Take thread time offs on a case by case basis based on evidence if who started, who instigated, who participated, and how much.

And keep the penalty periods short.

It takes a troll to know and tackle a troll.

And most of you are respectfully out of your depth here. I.e. you do not think like trolls.
 
Hardly, yaar. Begs the question, but, ki what constitutes a breach of community behaviour guidelines.. 🤔

I got warned for saying 'Rahul ghandy'.. I'd like to appeal against my conviction, take it to a higher court... a sentencing most unfair and reeking of bias.

Banking bhi saarey nationalist broskis languishing in forum jail. Good company, POWs, brothers in arms.

Rahul, Gandhi, Ghandy, Pappu, Prince, were discussed.

You were part of it.

Yet you chose to flaunt it.

You need to learn when to zip it up and back off.
 
Rahul, Gandhi, Ghandy, Pappu, Prince, were discussed.

You were part of it.

Yet you chose to flaunt it.

You need to learn when to zip it up and back off.
Chalo koi nahi, tab tak tuk tuk practice.

Strokemaker hu, natural instincts curb karni padengi... tricky pitch.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Chalo koi mahi, tab tak tuk tuk practice.

Strokemaker hu, natural instincts curb karni padengi... tricky pitch.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The point is you and your sanghi crowd do not respect him.

We secularists do not respect your darling.

How many times did you hear 56 or fenku?

Its not a big thing to discuss on muddas and not personalities. Keeps the discussion civil.

Otherwise before long people start talking about Muslim guys bonking Parsi girls.

Cheers, Doc
 
I hope you realise that the attacks have all been on one side, from all the rest of you bunched up against Doc. We are not there to even the balance, but to notice and to impede transgressions. If the bunch makes the transgressions in a one-sided manner, what is a neutral observer to do?
 
I hope you realise that the attacks have all been on one side, from all the rest of you bunched up against Doc. We are not there to even the balance, but to notice and to impede transgressions. If the bunch makes the transgressions in a one-sided manner, what is a neutral observer to do?

But equally Joe, Doc has been gifted with a fat one. Which he has used well over the years. Both casually, to procreate divinely and to make the hordes spin on.

Doc (or no adult member) does NOT need special protection. 👊

Just the basic tenets of classy civil discourse are fine.

I do agree sanghis lack the class in general. But we need to nurture them. Not ostracize them as Dalits for 2000 years.
 
from all the rest of you bunched up against Doc.
I have never textually attacked Doc.

Don't swing that way.

It is most disheartening to learn of this, kisne kya bola ? I'll set them straight.
 
Doc (or no adult member) does NOT need special protection.
The point I was making was precisely that we are not giving anyone special protection. For you to hold your own is entirely your achievement, we are not taking sides, but staying scrupulously aloof.
 
The point I was making was precisely that we are not giving anyone special protection. For you to hold your own is entirely your achievement, we are not taking sides, but staying scrupulously aloof.

Thank you for making that clear.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top