Maldives sacks multiple ministers to pacify India

How do you know that it was on the orders of China?
How do you know that it was cultivated on such orders?
Who is the mentor of Muizzu? Look at what he did and you will get an answer.

For all the India Out brouhaha, that person leased an islet to China for 50 years. He was also going to give the deal of costal guard facilities that India got to China but he was interrupted by the elections and later by corruption charges. India snatching that deal did not go well in China so they funded this campaign.
 
Could I say that I am proud of the Serum Institute, and also of Bharat Biotech, who were interfered with? Both the organisations did us proud, Serum Institute for its deft, professional efficiency, Bharat Biotech for manfully trying to help.
 
This kind of vulgarity, the reason why a totally tactless Mani Shankar Iyer of the Congress called him a neech admi, is what his true self is.
Just to jog your memory:

Modi was called Neech Aadmi in 2017
Deedi O Deedi was in 2021.

So no, Mani Shankar Iyer had his own issues with Modi much before he used "Didi O Didi" remark.

Larger point: Didi O Didi while a very crude remark, is nothing out of blue. Much worse things have been said from both sides for way longer.

I have fond memories of "Thu Thu" Rally and "Dhikkar Rally" from 90s and 00s.
 
Larger point: Didi O Didi while a very crude remark, is nothing out of blue. Much worse things have been said from both sides for way longer.
I heard that, the crowd heard that, and it was a general reaction. The feeling of alienation from north Indians grew. That was one of the turning points of that election.

Now, in every way, it becomes aggravated.
 
"This kind of vulgarity, the reason why a totally tactless Mani Shankar Iyer of the Congress called him a neech admi"

I do not know what else to infer here.
You might start with Mani Shankar Iyer recognising him for what he is, long before other Congress people, or other outsiders to these parties, did.
It would be more accurate, for one thing.
 
You might start with Mani Shankar Iyer recognising him for what he is, long before other Congress people, or other outsiders to these parties, did.
It would be more accurate, for one thing.
As if others and especially Congressi and TMC are mountains of virtue.
 
Heh.
You don't get to choose which water you are in. You can choose to swim or to sink.
Your party has chosen, and chosen aptly for its capabilities.
When Jaishankar asked the US not to question China on her aggressive behaviour in East Ladakh, that closed the door.
 
As if others and especially Congressi and TMC are mountains of virtue.
Of course not. They stink. Did I imply anything different? What I am trying to convey is that, filthy and foul as they are, they are better than the BJP.
 
Your party has chosen, and chosen aptly for its capabilities.
When Jaishankar asked the US not to question China on her aggressive behaviour in East Ladakh, that closed the door.
It chooses its enemies carefully. Look at the difference it is having in dealing with Canada and USA in the same matter.
 
It chooses its enemies carefully. Look at the difference it is having in dealing with Canada and USA in the same matter.
Yes, it is noticeable that it selects its morals and ethics very carefully.
 
Of course not. They stink. Did I imply anything different? What I am trying to convey is that, filthy and foul as they are, they are better than the BJP.
Better? Sorry but there is no better among them. They all are bad in their own ways. You just dislike one specific kind of bad more. Its a personal preference. Objectively, they all stink as you said.
 
Yes, it is noticeable that it selects its morals and ethics very carefully.
Moral ? Ethics? Foreign policy is not based on morals and ethics. Otherwise USA would not be doing Bay of Pigs. Its based on interests. I guess you would be knowing it already.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top