Indian Politics and Internal News

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/no-free-lunch/the-curious-case-of-the-waqf-board/


It became a big issue in Tamil Nadu recently where a Hindu farmer went to sell some land for his daughter’s wedding and was told by the local registrar’s office that the land was not his to sell and he would need permission from the Waqf Board. The land was with his family for years along with the lands belonging to several villages in the area amounting to some 400 acres, all of which had belonged to the Hindus for generations.

The farmer was at a loss. According to the Waqf Board law, he would now have to go before a Muslim tribunal where someone well versed in Islam would judge if the land belonged to him or to the Allah. The Waqf board law says all lands that belonged to it were in Allah’s name.

he head of the Waqf board, a kindly gentleman, was interviewed on TV and he confirmed that the Hindu villages, including a 1500-year-old Chola temple, did indeed belong to the Waqf Board and were given to them by their forefathers.

VIEW: LOL a 1500 yr old temple was given to WAQF by their fore-fathers!!!! Excellent Secularism

It is not only Hindus who are upset with the way the Waqf Board is being administered. In some cases, as in UP, burial land was sold by the Waqf board for a mall to local politicians and obviously the Muslims were upset. It did not benefit the community at all, only the board members, all well placed Muslims, got the proceeds of the sale.

Recently, it was reported that a Muslim gentlemen Hafiz Qureshi had lodged a complaint against AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan over misuse of Waqf board property. Qureshi had alleged with the authorities that the MLA had his own people in the board and instead of five members voting on decisions he had only two members vote for decisions made to sell or lease Asf properties.

VIEW: So its not just Hindus, but also Muslims who have negative views on WAQF administration!!!! WOW WOW
 
As far as Temples are concerned, Doc sb. they are govt regulated iinw ?

but not Mosques and Churches, and they, incidentally (though perhaps not surprisingly) are beneficiaries of foreign funding from their parent organizations abroad.

right ?

Exactly what I suspect.

The government cannot be seen giving ancestral historical temple land to Adani and co.

Hindus will bury Modi and BJP and the sangh for the next 500 years.

But if private temple trusts run by priests and pandas do it?

Diabolical.

Cheers, Doc
 
Exactly what I suspect.

The government cannot be seen giving ancestral historical temple land to Adani and co.

Hindus will bury Modi and BJP and the sangh for the next 500 years.

But if private temple trusts run by priests and pandas do it?

Diabolical.

Cheers, Doc
Stay on topic please

topic is Waqf
 
Exactly what I suspect.

The government cannot be seen giving ancestral historical temple land to Adani and co.

Hindus will bury Modi and BJP and the sangh for the next 500 years.

But if private temple trusts run by priests and pandas do it?

Diabolical.

Cheers, Doc
Your point about the alternative method to hand over temple property (a wrong categorisation) to private trusts and priests and pandas is very sharp. However, there are false equivalences being proposed to you.

Please look up who is entitled to govern religious property, and the status of property supposed to belong to temples. It does not belong to the temple; the temple has no existence in the law governing these properties. The temple does not earn. There is zero equivalence with Church and Mosque earnings (not property) from donations, local or foreign, and it is a canard spread by bhakts like two idiots who are clouding the whole argument. Ignore this bait.
 
Last edited:
Stay on topic please

topic is Waqf
Please be careful, as you shouldn't troll. It means only post what is true.

Now wait for two seconds for magic to happen , MAGIC MAGIC MAGIC

SO MAGIC DID HAPPEN :eek::eek:

Change this and show us all what you are
 

Attachments

  • freedom-speech-meme-funny-social-media-sharing-political-correctness-issue-172122789.png
    freedom-speech-meme-funny-social-media-sharing-political-correctness-issue-172122789.png
    338 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Please be careful, as you shouldn't troll. It means only post what is true.

Now wait for two seconds for magic to happen , MAGIC MAGIC MAGIC
I posted the topic as is, from a very neutral source.

ThePrint is anything but sanghi afaik.
 
I posted the topic as is, from a very neutral source.

ThePrint is anything but sanghi afaik.
There is nothing or no one, that is/or neutral. Its all agenda driven, we just don't know the threads behind that is all.
 
There is nothing or no one, that is/or neutral. Its all agenda driven, we just don't know the threads behind that is all.
Ya man, all these "news" organizations, all ideologically inclined one way or the other.. some are blatantly pro/anti X thing, others try to maintain a veneer of neutrality but is easy to spot for the most part.
 
Your point about the alternative method to hand over temple property (a wrong categorisation) to private trusts and priests and pandas is very sharp. However, there are false equivalences being proposed to you.

Please look up who is entitled to govern religious property, and the status of property supposed to belong to temples. It does not belong to the temple; the temple has no existence in the law governing these properties. The temple does not earn. There is zero equivalence with Church and Mosque earnings (not property) from donations, local or foreign, and it is a canard spread by bhakts like two idiots who are clouding the whole argument. Ignore this bait.

I dont think the target are the donations.

But the land. And what is buried under it.

What was the target of demonetisation?

Cheers, Doc
 

This is inevitable and is pretty much the formula by which most of their ancestors became Muslim in the first place.

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont think the target are the donations.

But the land. And what is buried under it.

What was the target of demonetisation?

Cheers, Doc
Interesting, but could you explain further?
 
Interesting, but could you explain further?

Just as the target of demonetisation was for one large section in one fell swoop to normalise unimaginable black wealth that till then was effectively blocked in country (where the power and good life was)

Just as demonetisation was a way to shut the money tap of the opposition, and corner wealth to buy governments and power.

I suspect there is more to this than simply outward communal histrionics.

Remember . These are gujjus.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top