Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

Status
Not open for further replies.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The SC said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


These zionist scum and their offsprings will one day have to smell the reality. Justice have a tendency to be handed out eventually… just give it time.
 
I remember the Israeli military spokesman said on October 1, when the spectacular Iranian strike on Israel happened, that we are going to strike Iran 'tonight' . It is about 20 day since that 'tonight'. And with every passing day, the influence of a regional war's impact on the US elections is probably getting less and less and with that Netanyahu's calculations to start a regional war loses its potency.
Me and most American/Western analysts have no doubt that Netanyahu wants to take advantage of the US elections to start a regional war. But something is still missing even if we think the THAAD system is a prelude to a regional war. Why no attack so far. Credible analysts are saying that the Pentagon wants to stop a regional war; the Pentagon is still scarred by what happened in Kabul in August 2021, which was a blot on the American military akin to the one in Saigon's American Embassy. Pentagon is pushing back and that's believable.
As Matthew Hoh said a few days ago: He has been watching the news especially late evening/night American time to see if Israel struck Iran or not. Me too.
 
Meengla said:
I remember the Israeli military spokesman said on October 1, when the spectacular Iranian strike on Israel happened, that we are going to strike Iran 'tonight' . It is about 20 day since that 'tonight'. And with every passing day, the influence of a regional war's impact on the US elections is probably getting less and less and with that Netanyahu's calculations to start a regional war loses its potency.
Me and most American/Western analysts have no doubt that Netanyahu wants to take advantage of the US elections to start a regional war. But something is still missing even if we think the THAAD system is a prelude to a regional war. Why no attack so far. Credible analysts are saying that the Pentagon wants to stop a regional war; the Pentagon is still scarred by what happened in Kabul in August 2021, which was a blot on the American military akin to the one in Saigon's American Embassy. Pentagon is pushing back and that's believable.
As Matthew Hoh said a few days ago: He has been watching the news especially late evening/night American time to see if Israel struck Iran or not. Me too.
Click to expand...

As the US is not willing to attack in conjunction.

Iran can deliver a "decapitating strike" using 1000 missiles in retaliation and that is why the entity is hesitating. The capability was proven on October 1st.
 
The problem for Israel right now, is not that it can't do a strike. It can. The range means, the effects of those strikes is limited as there is only so much combat power they can use at that distance. Its just that Iran has indicated that its strategic patience over.

I do think Iran will make a point of hitting things to try and make things painful for Israel. Given how small Israel is, its level of redundancy to absorb real damage is low. Two oil refineries with 300k barrel capacity - that is all they have.

Look at how many power stations they have(not many!) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_Israel

Israels ability to absort Irans reply is limited. Iran wont do a theatrical smoke/mirror light show next time. It will be something that is meant to hurt.

Also, the key problem is that if Israel does attack nuclear infrastructure in Iran, the contamination effects are easier to absorb since so many facilities are underground and Iran is soo large. This is not the case for Israel, and its small land mass means that if Iran does reply in kind and hits Israels sole nuclear reactor, the contamination will affect all of its population centres.
 
UKBengali said:
As the US is not willing to attack in conjunction.
Iran can deliver a "decapitating strike" using 1000 missiles in retaliation and that is why the entity is hesitating. The capability was proven on October 1st.
Click to expand...

Yes, October 1 was a game changer strike. A paradigm shift for Israel who, if they were really that stupid, thought of a repeat of the (symbolic) April attack from Iran. But it is the American position that is intriguing to me. Everyone knows that Israel is incapable of attacking on its own to cause major damage and/or surviving an attack from Iran. So has there been a real pushback by the Pentagon like it was given in case of when Zelensky wanting the American long range missiles or not?? A pushback can happen in America: There are significant inputs in America. It is a democracy despite its flaws. It is not like some king sitting on a throne making huge decisions where there is no real dissent or pushbacks. Sometimes the dissenting voices prevail, AIPAC or not.
 
Ali_Baba said:
The problem for Israel right now, is not that it can't do a strike. It can. The range means, the effects of those strikes is limited as there is only so much combat power they can use at that distance. Its just that Iran has indicated that its strategic patience over.
Click to expand...
Right after October 1, the Iranian officials went to some American-allied Arab countries and must have told them that if they cooperate with Israel/America, then they would be on targets. So, yes, distance/range is a factor. One analyst said that's why Israel has invested in Azerbaijan so much?? Plus the Israeli submarines. But still... without American help, I don't see how Israel can pull off a major attack on Iran without surviving the retaliation.


Ali_Baba said:
I do think Iran will make a point of hitting things to try and make things painful for Israel. Given how small Israel is, its level of redundancy to absorb real damage is low. Two oil refineries with 300k barrel capacity - that is all they have.
Click to expand...
Right.
Ali_Baba said:
Also, the key problem is that if Israel does attack nuclear infrastructure in Iran, the contamination effects are easier to absorb since so many facilities are underground and Iran is soo large. This is not the case for Israel, and its small land mass means that if Iran does reply in kind and hits Israels sole nuclear reactor, the contamination will affect all of its population centres.
Click to expand...

From what I heard, Israel would like to damage the area around the nuclear infra in Iran to make then inaccessible for quite a long time.
 
Dalit said:
The Zionists contribute the same money they receive from the US/EU in billions of dollars/euro's in economic aid.

I tried to ask Copilot and Gemini, but no exact figures for even 2023.

View attachment 73782
Click to expand...

The official figures can also give a false view, as there are huge sums which go through non-governmental means.

Forexample through companies, shell companies, NGOs, «Charities», Zionist lobbies, Zionist individual donors, Evangelical Xtian channels, Hollywood Zionist funding campigns and so on.

Israel would be NOTHING without the support from West and United States in particular. The support Palestinians recieve from muslims and Arabs, pales in comparison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top