Operation True Promise II - dozens of Iranian ballistic missiles hit Israel

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not so sure about that, infact this article being deleted could be an indication its most probably this


quote from archive
"Development on the Arrow began in 2012, with the company conducting a test flight in Israel two years later using a smaller-scale, 4m-long version. Mr Kelley said the results were “better than expected”.
The company plans to do full-scale unmanned tests in four different countries next month, to look at how the Arrow handles high speeds, payload stress and control inputs from the ground.
The aim is to simultaneously launch the Arrow in Israel, Australia, Czech Republic and the US with “one click of a button” in Singapore, and make the drones execute what they are programmed to do."

archive link https://web.archive.org/web/2022080...t-drone-arrow-seletar-kelley-aerospace-315671

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


@hyperman @MMM-E @Merzifonlu , send this article to bayraktar, turkey must copy this, this would be easy to make for turkey, it uses mould design.


In my opinion, There is literally no way it has a lower RCS than RQ-170 unless Israel found a way to defy laws of physics. If the renderings are accurate, the very long wingspan and tail stabilizers are all radar refraction points vs RQ-170 flying wing design. People trying to convince us this is an F-22/F-35 type observable are beyond delusional. First of all those fall in the category of VLO, where as even the leaked documents say Israel drone is “LO” which can even mean an RCS of close to 1m2.

There is a reason the smallest RCS is typically in flying wing design as it has the least amount of angles to refract radar. F-22 was able to get extremely low, but that was with radar absorbing paint and materials coating that was extensive to maintain coupled with a extreme focus on design.

Anyway what caught RQ-170 wasn’t necessarily radar, but IFR cameras that iran has developed with 50KM-75KM range. It doesn’t matter what RCS you have when it comes to IFR and I doubt this Israeli drone goes thru all the necessary heat signature reduction that 5th gen fighters go thru.

So this Israeli drone unless it’s flying in heavy overcast will be picked infrared cameras along the border that specifically scan the sky for certain VLO/LO objects.

I don’t doubt Israel has a LR drone that can fire a BM, what I doubt is that this drone is as “stealthy” as they claim which is basically flying undetected over Iran you would need a B-2/F-22 RCS while avoiding radar defense zones. Such a drone would be hundreds of millions of dollars, well outside of an Israeli budget unless built and supplied by America.
 
The White House: Israel must respond to the Iranian attack, and we will not review what they will do

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

That means in reality just the contrary. They will supervise how, when and how much.
 
Is it true that Israel has attacked Karaj nuclear plant of Iran?

its none sense,

there is no nuclear plant in karaj l ol

they are desperate, so those pro israel guys on twitter are making up stuff.

its funny that their media picked it up, (seems they deleted those stories again though ,after relazing its fake lmao...)
 
Last edited:
Israel intelligence sources "we have to find alternative to air launched ballistic missile strike to Iran, the strike will be delayed" excuses

israeli-sources-8384848.jpg





the "Leak" was a hoax anyway, they know their plan to "Firing air launched ballistic missiles against Iran with Jets over Iraqi skies towards Iran" would be similar to their attempt in April = no real success.....

a large iranian counter strike would have followed that would this time be aimed at Israeli infrastructure and government headquarters , no warning shot this time. Israel would have been humiliated again.


so they have to focus as i said on 2nd october already on symbolic sabotage attacks.

(planted bombs, cyber attacks, terror attacks)

"Alternative plan".
 
Last edited:
Israel intelligence sources "we have to find alternative to air launched ballistic missile strike to Iran, the strike will be delayed"

israeli-sources-8384848.jpg



GapsVmeXkAA9bnx



the "Leak" was a hoax anyway, they know their plan to "Firing air launched ballistic missiles against Iran with Jets over Iraqi skies towards Iran" would be similar to their attempt in April = no real success.....

a large iranian counter strike would have followed that would this time be aimed at Israeli infrastructure and government headquarters , no warning shot this time. Israel would have been humiliated again.


so they have to focus as i said on 2nd october already on symbolic sabotage attacks.

(planted bombs, cyber attacks, terror attacks)

"Alternative plan".
Another excuse for doing nothing

They will resort to fund a Wahhabi terrorist to attack a mosque with ak-47
 
Another excuse for doing nothing

They will resort to fund a Wahhabi terrorist to attack a mosque with ak-47
So true! Hard to believe the entire west lies exposed for the total joke they are in conventional warfare.

The only thing good theys got is that wonderful Scalp/Storm Shadow.

That weapon I actually do respect because it is successful in Ukraine, flying nape of the earth, hard to detect and highly accurate.
 
Guess it is in Israeli interests to keep saying strike is imminent on one hand and delaying it on the other. Being on constant alert can take a toll on Iranian men and equipment, as it would on any force
 
Israel intelligence sources "we have to find alternative to air launched ballistic missile strike to Iran, the strike will be delayed" excuses

israeli-sources-8384848.jpg





the "Leak" was a hoax anyway, they know their plan to "Firing air launched ballistic missiles against Iran with Jets over Iraqi skies towards Iran" would be similar to their attempt in April = no real success.....

a large iranian counter strike would have followed that would this time be aimed at Israeli infrastructure and government headquarters , no warning shot this time. Israel would have been humiliated again.


so they have to focus as i said on 2nd october already on symbolic sabotage attacks.

(planted bombs, cyber attacks, terror attacks)

"Alternative plan".


We are dealing with a rabid dog with nukes who believes it is invincible and chosen by God.

It is in the very nature of this cancer to spread. It is logical therefore, for this cancer to treat anything that tries to hinder its expansion an existential threat. In other words, its very nature is antagonistic and it is logically impossible to be at peace with it within the confines of international norms.

It now faces an existential threat from several places. Moreover, its deterrence is in shatters. Its becoming somewhat of a joke. There is also some noise I'm hearing, although of course it may not be true (tweets):

- Galant: our response may affect other countries (nuclear fallout)
- Blinken: alluding to events not seen in 100 years (you can guess what that is)

again, not sure if above has actually been said as they are mostly tweets. However, if true, I am fearful of the following scenario:

- Israel will launch a nuclear attack on Iran. The attack needs to be powerful enough to mitigate a retaliation.

The best case scenario in this situation for Iran is several smaller yield nukes at military sites with the threat of taking out Tehran if they retaliate.

The leak was simply a ploy to make Iran think the worst case scenario wouldn't come to fruition....

Can anyone verify whether Galant or Blinken have said those things?

I honestly can't think of any other way out for Israel if it wishes to remain on the course it has chosen for itself. It is inevitable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top