Whatever

I'm fine with a no holds barred free for all

full


aaj jao fir

khali-joins-bjp.jpeg

Yes we know.
 
@Joe Shearer sir one for your pursual as you are the designated Indian Mod. Decide what is acceptable among yourselves and admin.
Yes, Sir.

This is a storm in a tea-cup, conjured up by a member who cannot think of any positive way to contribute to the forum.

Two things: First, the rules are clear. They are reproduced for your perusal.

Ethnic / political / nationalistic hate

Needless to say, PDF wishes to be a productive exchange of ideas and not a place of spreading communal, national, political or religiously motivated hatred. Members found involved in such activities would be severely penalized.
Direction: any term used to spread hatred is not allowed.
What is hated?
It is most subjective.
So, if any member uses a collective term on another, and if the second member has no objection to that, it is not for action.
If any member uses a collective term on another, and if that member objects, the first member has the option of deleting or substituting the term, failing which he or she will be warned and points awarded.

Individual Harassment

Kindly do not ruin PDF for other members; such behavior includes following a member around PDF and replying their posts with harassing content such as thinly veiled threats or passive aggressive behavior or making the member feel as if they are being harassed. Such accusations would be investigated and would result in a ban. Moreover, kindly, do not share personal information about any member on PDF. We are a public forum, nor attempt to garner such information using PDF
No member will be subjected to harassing content, thinly veiled threats or passive aggressive behaviour, making the member feel as if they are being harassed. The punishment is a ban, not points awarded.

Purely for the member feeling harassed to complain, for the member doing the harassment and identified by the moderation team to delete, to substitute or be banned.
 
Trolling

Any content or response given with the intent of simply antagonizing people (such as a particular group e.g. Pakistanis, Muslims, Christians, Women, Hindus, Indians, Africans etc.) or a particular individual in order to garner a negative emotional response is considered trolling. More generally, essentially trolling is bullying online where by either a person is subjected to denial of opportunity to speak or making them feel very bad or inflaming them to be upset only. It is understood that during dialogues on sensitive issues there would be some words considered offensive but as long as it is not generalized to justify discrimination or packaged as a personal attack then that is acceptable because the spirit of the exchange is reflection or sharing of an opinion. Responding to trolling is deemed as ‘feeding the trolls’ and would be considered trolling too. It is not justifiable to respond to trolling with trolling and would also be addressed.

Trolling is a widespread problem and user’s postage history would be taken into account. Repeated offenders may face a permanent ban and trolling is taken seriously at PDF. Kindly, it does not help anyone and causes a ruining of the decorum therefore, would be dealt with appropriately.

@Sharma Ji

You have wasted enough time on asking for the rules to be relaxed. The rules ARE relaxed. Abuse of these rules will be dealt with. Your constant refrain on the subject is really not relevant.
 
Purely for the member feeling harassed to complain, for the member doing the harassment and identified by the moderation team to delete, to substitute or be banned.

This. Let posts be reported for any steps needed. It all begins there.
 
@Joe Shearer sir one for your pursual as you are the designated Indian Mod. Decide what is acceptable among yourselves and admin.
Yes, Sir.

This is a storm in a tea-cup, conjured up by a member who cannot think of any positive way to contribute to the forum.

Two things: First, the rules are clear. They are reproduced for your perusal.

Ethnic / political / nationalistic hate

Needless to say, PDF wishes to be a productive exchange of ideas and not a place of spreading communal, national, political or religiously motivated hatred. Members found involved in such activities would be severely penalized.
Any term used to spread hatred is not allowed.
What is hatred?
It is most subjective.
So, if any member uses a collective term on another, and if the second member has no objection to that, it is not for action.
If any member uses a collective term on another, and if that member objects, the first member has the option of deleting or substituting the term, failing which he or she will be warned and points awarded.

Individual Harassment

Kindly do not ruin PDF for other members; such behavior includes following a member around PDF and replying their posts with harassing content such as thinly veiled threats or passive aggressive behavior or making the member feel as if they are being harassed. Such accusations would be investigated and would result in a ban. Moreover, kindly, do not share personal information about any member on PDF. We are a public forum, nor attempt to garner such information using PDF
No member will be subjected to harassing content, thinly veiled threats or passive aggressive behaviour, making the member feel as if they are being harassed. The punishment is a ban, not points awarded.

Purely for the member feeling harassed to complain, for the member doing the harassment and identified by the moderation team to delete, to substitute or be banned.
 
@Sharma Ji

You have wasted enough time on asking for the rules to be relaxed. The rules ARE relaxed. Abuse of these rules will be dealt with. Your constant refrain on the subject is really not relevant.

The rules need to be followed. No exceptions.
 
some of us don't care for this snowflakery, rool, pool de fool

akkhan nu akkhan mila ke boald

katti jabada na phudd jaye


/my horrible Haryanvi jaat bhasha attempt
 
@Sharma Ji

You have wasted enough time on asking for the rules to be relaxed. The rules ARE relaxed. Abuse of these rules will be dealt with. Your constant refrain on the subject is really not relevant.
fine

just as long as koi "..for thee but not for me" type scene na ho
 
@Hiptullha @Talwar-e-Pakistan
Is it true that most christian in Pakistan are not natives but brought from different parts of India by the brits?, IK Karachi ones have Goan background but how true is this theory for others in Pak
 
@vsdoc is this true?

First Indian who went to England was a Parsi named Navrozji Rustamji from Surat Gujarat. He visited England in 1723 AD to plead his legal claims. Early Parsi travelers to England: Faramji Dadabhai 1807, Kekhusru Faramji 1832, Dinshaw Fardunji 1833, Manekji 1838 AD.
 
@vsdoc is this true?

First Indian who went to England was a Parsi named Navrozji Rustamji from Surat Gujarat. He visited England in 1723 AD to plead his legal claims. Early Parsi travelers to England: Faramji Dadabhai 1807, Kekhusru Faramji 1832, Dinshaw Fardunji 1833, Manekji 1838 AD.

Could well be. Though I really don't know. Will have to Google just like you. 😄

But why is it surprising? Fir the longest time, Parsis represented the native population in British circles in areas as varied as law to cycling to medicine to cricket. Even rugby.

Cheers, Doc
 
Could well be. Though I really don't know. Will have to Google just like you. 😄

But why is it surprising? Fir the longest time, Parsis represented the native population in British circles in areas as varied as law to cycling to medicine to cricket. Even rugby.

Cheers, Doc
haha i came across this page

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top