Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

[Kyussis]

Not a good idea to insult people when you want to make them understand your point of view.

Majority are too dumbed down to ever understand our point of view!

 

[The SC]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[925boy]

Its going to get worse before it gets better.

So Hezbollah, Gaza and the resistance axis should ESCALATE their beat down of Israel ASAP, before genocidal Trump takes office, because its likely to get worse for them once he comes in. smfh.

 

[The SC]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[The SC]

Egyptian journalist Rahma Zein reveals the Israeli army’s continuous attempts for more than 70 years to implant a “defeat mentality” among the Palestinians and refutes the allegations that Israel is the only democratic state in the Middle East.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Meengla]

Even more than money, media is the strongest weapon. Even Elon Musk with his billions had to bow to Zionists when they complained that his Twitter/X was allowing too much criticism of Israel.

Would you allow a fanatical Christian/Hindu/Muslim/Jewish/communist/capitalist/whatever propagandist to be alone in your children's bedroom to preach to them and brainwash them?

And yet this is exactly what a TV set is, in so many people's bedrooms and living rooms, with unimpeded access to spread one-sided Zionist propaganda all day every day.

Money buys the media. Money buys the politicians. "Money makes the world go around". I gave example of how a non-entity like Ross Perot managed to get almost 20% of American votes in 1992 using his immense wealth!! 20% of a Superpower's voters!! And here is something even more interesting: Despite all the GCC Arab money, if they try to buy some media houses in America, they would not be allowed to. Why? Because to enable that purchase would require political decisions and why would the politicians, who are already paid for, allow that? I recall, not long after 9/11 attack, some GCC Arab country's port agency wanted to manage some port in America; it would be a really mundane job but there was so much hue and cry that the agency had to withdraw. A political decision trumped a mutually beneficial business decision.
The key remains the political control--the rest will follow that. The Zionists have it all in America and to neutralize their influence is only possible through organized, focused, strategic, and long term political means. The only other alternate is that foreign wars bleed America so much that the domestic turmoil causes a major rethink.

 

[Meengla]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Dan has really 'Gone Native'. Bravo!! As I said a today, he can have a great life if he stays away from the fray: The Zionists especially hate white people who support the Palestinians because such white people greatly neutralize the Zionist propaganda.

Similar to what Dan saying was said centuries ago by a famous ruler of the Indo Pak Subcontinent: Tipu Sultan who fought against the British colonialists and paid the ultimate price. Here is the quote:

 

[The SC]

40 days, northern Gaza is exposed to ethnic cleansing, forced displacement, total destruction, and the killing of every citizen who moves. This aggression and these horrific massacres resulted in nearly 2,000 martyrs, more than 6,000 injured, and dozens of missing people, and the prevention of medical relief, the forced cessation of civil defense crews from work, the siege of hospitals, and the prevention of the arrival of materials. Medical services were provided to help the injured, which led to the death of a number of them, and an unjust siege was imposed on all regions of the north to starve thousands of families there who refused to be displaced and are still present until now in Jabalia camp, Beit Lahia, Jabalia al-Balad, Nazla, and Beit Hanoun..*

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Ministry of Health in Gaza:
- The number of victims of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip increased to 43,712 martyrs and 103,258 injured.
- The occupation committed 7 massacres during the past 24 hours, as a result of which 47 martyrs and 182 injured were brought to hospitals.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[EugeneP]

Money buys the media. Money buys the politicians. "Money makes the world go around". I gave example of how a non-entity like Ross Perot managed to get almost 20% of American votes in 1992 using his immense wealth!! 20% of a Superpower's voters!!

Were you here in U.S. in 1992? Ross Perot did not get 20% because of his money. He got it because of his ideas. Though faulty, he was able to create enough economic fear among his followers that then newly instituted NAFTA is going to take away all your jobs and make you poor. It was his talent to create fear, uncertainty and doubt that won him 20%. though he was somewhat eccentric and not very effective campaigner. Trump, in many respects, ran 2024 campaign like Perot's 1992 campaign. Except, Perot was a much more honorable, though somewhat misguided man.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Fun fact: Harris campaign spent lot more money than Trump's and failed spectacularly.

 

[Developereo]

Money buys the media. Money buys the politicians. "Money makes the world go around". I gave example of how a non-entity like Ross Perot managed to get almost 20% of American votes in 1992 using his immense wealth!! 20% of a Superpower's voters!! And here is something even more interesting: Despite all the GCC Arab money, if they try to buy some media houses in America, they would not be allowed to. Why? Because to enable that purchase would require political decisions and why would the politicians, who are already paid for, allow that? I recall, not long after 9/11 attack, some GCC Arab country's port agency wanted to manage some port in America; it would be a really mundane job but there was so much hue and cry that the agency had to withdraw. A political decision trumped a mutually beneficial business decision.
The key remains the political control--the rest will follow that. The Zionists have it all in America and to neutralize their influence is only possible through organized, focused, strategic, and long term political means. The only other alternate is that foreign wars bleed America so much that the domestic turmoil causes a major rethink.

It's still the other way round.

Media is at the top. Media can destroy a business' reputation and crater it into the ground. That is why Musk bowed to the Zionist media.

Media lays the groundwork and 'manufactures consent' so that the puppet politicians have political cover to do what they were ordered to do.

Your example of Perot proves my point. There was ZERO chance he would survive the Zionist media gauntlet and, as predicted, they destroyed him as a loony tunes Texan billionaire with the $5 haircut and conspiracy theories. All his money was wasted.

Your other example of GCC media ownership also proves my point. Control of Western media is the crown jewel in the Zionists' hoard. There is no way they will allow any significant Chinese or Arab control of Western media. Arab ownership of NewsCorp is kept at arms' length to make sure editorial control remains firmly in hardcore Zionist hands.

Indians are tolerated up to a point but only as far as they behave and never to the extent where they might threaten Zionist control.

 

[Khansaheeb]

Which is why all Iran needs from Pakistan @Khansaheeb is simply for Pakistan to not allow Saudi, US and Israeli Islamic proxies in its territories like Jaish Ul-Adl to flourish and attack Iran- simple! dont worry about giving iran bombs, jsut dont let iran's enemies' proxies use Pakistan as a base for attacking Iran, i bet Iran will appreciate that and not ask for more from Pakistan.

Sad state of affairs indeed, anything and everything goes in Pakistan we would even bargain with the devil himself.

 

[EyelessInGaza]

Were you here in U.S. in 1992? Ross Perot did not get 20% because of his money. He got it because of his ideas…..

As someone who has participated in supporting a few minor election campaigns in the US, and actually run a few major ones elsewhere (always in an organisational capacity, not as a candidate), I can say with absolute confidence that it’s the other way round.

Ideas are a dime a dozen; Perot certainly wasn’t original, or the only one, in his anti NAFTA stance.

What Perot had that was not so easy to get - the dollars to support his ideas and convince the electorate that he was President material.

Next time you’re observing an election - anywhere in the world (provided it’s more or less fair)- just check out a candidate’s campaign office in one borough or division or locality. Observe the number of staff, the infrastructure, the food, the posters, handbills etc.

Who pays for all that? Now multiply this a thousand times for a U.S. Presidential election. The rallies, the conferences, the travel.

There is a saying in military affairs: “Amateurs talk strategy; professionals talk logistics“.

It’s the same in politics - of course ideas are important. But at the end of the day, winning an election is hugely dependent on logistics, your infrastructure. Money.

A Democrat or Republican Presidential candidate has to spend a lot of money, but at least they have the massive, well oiled infrastructure of the lot parties to support them.

An independent candidate? He or she has to make a thousand times the effort. Forget about it.

That’s why Perot’s electoral success wasn’t about his ideas as much as his ability to fund the infrastructure to fight an election.

The fact that it was a popular idea helped a lot. Absolutely. But had a person with no wealth stood up for election to the US President’s office, well best of luck getting even ten thousand votes.

 

[Davey Crockett]

Erdogan Hails Russia & China For Backing Arms Embargo On Israel​

Earlier this month Turkey submitted a letter to the United Nations calling for a complete arms embargo on Israel, charging that its military is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has presented a full blockade on weapons as an 'effective solution' for ending the war in Gaza and achieving peace. Notably, among at least 52 countries to cosign that letter are Russia and China.

"Our hope is that Trump takes very different steps towards the region this term because the messages being given from time to time concern us," Erdogan told reporters after leaving Baku.

Erdogan Hails Russia & China For Backing Arms Embargo On Israel | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Davey Crockett]

The alternative media is the media.

Donald Trump would not have won three elections without the alternative media (AM). The mainstream media (MSM) were almost uniformly opposed to his campaigns. He has made adroit use of social media site Twitter (now X) to bypass the MSM. However, not everyone is on X and in all three campaigns he received a crucial boost from the AM. They allowed his message to be conveyed to an ever-expanding audience and in many cases explicitly supported him.

Plenty of AM commentary has hailed the MSM’s dwindling patronage and its impending demise. The numbers are even worse than they look because the MSM’s viewers and readers skew towards the senior citizen set. It is losing people not just because of its manifest deficiencies; its audience is dying off. Younger generations don’t watch TV news or read The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, or Washington Post. The Post’s owner Jeff Bezos recently noted his paper’s dwindling readership, credibility, and revenue. Put a toe tag on the MSM and slide its drawer closed.

I come not to bury the MSM, but to praise the AM, remind readers of its vital role, and encourage them to support it.

People have turned to the AM because from its roiling cauldron of chaos, clashing opinions, tireless researchers, incisive analysts, idiosyncratic styles, competitive jockeying, backbiting, obnoxious self-promotion, and unwavering irreverence, truth tends to emerge. The AM can be likened to the ferment of true science (science didn’t used to have to have a true in front of it): assertions proposed, tested, rejected, accepted, refined, but never deemed ultimate truth.

Robert Gore, SLL, “Ants at the Picnic, Part One,” May 25, 2023

I said in Ants that: Bullets and blogs are the ants at the globalist picnic, and they may prove just as hard to eradicate. It’s not overstating the case to say that the AM has been the reason we haven’t had to resort to bullets . . . so far.

Fight! Fight! Fight! . . . for the Truth, by Robert Gore

h/t el gato malo The alternative media is the media. Donald Trump would not have won three elections without the alternative media (AM). The mainstream media (MSM) were almost uniformly opposed to …

straightlinelogic.com

 

[Mobius]

Meanwhile is Saudi....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies