hyperman
INT'L MOD
I don't know lol
Maybe because they will have enough of Turkey and say "ok,Russians are out, Erdogan in not reliable,he'll attack the Kurds,the Kurds on the other hand can be a useful ally against any Turkish, threat against Israel,a nice bulkhead against Iran and Iraq."
Reinforcing them eventually,is strategically and geopolitically very logical. It's the best thing for the Americans to have an ally in that part of the Middle-East,who is friendly towards Israel,dependent on the US and borders Turkey and the Shia crescent.
Ok lol? Do you still find it funny? lol
lmao
You don't trade Bishops and Queens for pawns on the chessboard.
I showed you the demographics of the region the PKK currently controls. If it was in Iraq maybe(but the Iraq play failed on it own, without turkish involvement), but Syria is a different matter. Out of all the States, Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, Syria has the least amount of kurds and all located in small snippets up at the border. And all bordering Turkey.
lol, the region is overwhelmingly Sunni Arabs and it borders Turkey, its literally the worst geography and demographics profile to use to make a play against Turkey. For very little gain tactically.







