Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar: Pakistan strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pure evil and gives Iran casus belli to attack.



I though you had a better military than ours? So there shouldn't be any militants coming over from your end, right?
Hi,

Try it and see your very existence evaporate in a cloud of heat.

And trust me---not a single country in the world would shed a single tear at your non existence---.
 
Hi,

Try it and see your very existence evaporate in a cloud of heat.

And trust me---not a single country in the world would shed a single tear at your non existence---.

But we tried it yesterday apparently and you called for a nuke strike. How did that go or have you forgotten?
 
I’m sorry to say but I don’t think this is anything to celebrate.

We can’t take care of the daily attacks happening within our country but instead as soon as Iran attacks some militant base we want to now show some kinda false bravado?

Really seems like daddy US gave us the green light to go ahead and attack especially in times where Iran are the only resistance standing up to Israel.

and here we are like “yes we attacked our Muslim brothers” we should keep the same energy when it comes from Kashmir and other internal factors.

Or a couple of those lovely Pakistani missiles given to the resistance against Israel? Not too much to ask is it.
 
Let's try to let cooler heads prevail.

Let's learn from history and the present and understand the big picture.

Antagonism between Pakistan and Iran is not good for either nation considering the jackals who would love such a thing.
 
Let's try to let cooler heads prevail.

Let's learn from history and the present and understand the big picture.

Antagonism between Pakistan and Iran is not good for either nation considering the jackals who would love such a thing.
Agreed and you can see hyenas and jackals licking their lips in multiple SM platforms.
 
It's early in the west, but I can tell you than Tehran bombing in Pakistan had little effect in news here.
Yes. But Pakistan bombing Iran will be huge news. Its midnight here so it will be on the news tomorrow
 
You are right other then the fact Iran your "Muslim brother "attacked first .

Iran would say that they targeted terrorists accountable of last attacks in Iran.

Who did the first move? likely who pay those terrorist, and I guess it was not Iran neither Pakistan, neither Baloch people.

I guess some famous Iran foe.

The root of every conflict in the zone recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRK
We need to have open dialogue and security cooperation. I bet you this is not possible because of heavy US influence over the armed forces in Pakistan.
 
Yes. But Pakistan bombing Iran will be huge news. Its midnight here so it will be on the news tomorrow
Pakistan is nuclear power and that always can get more easily a main headline when there are war tensions.
 
Foreign Office says a number of terrorists killed during intelligence-based operation, sole objective was "in pursuit of Pakistan’s own security and national interest".


Pakistan on Thursday morning struck terrorist hideouts in Iran’s Siestan-o-Baluchistan province, less than 48 hours after Iran violated its airspace.

According to a statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Pakistan undertook a series of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision military strikes and killed a number of terrorists during the intelligence-based operation codenamed ‘Marg Bar Sarmachar’.

Iran on Tuesday had launched attacks in Pakistan targeting what it described as bases for the militant group Jaish al-Adl in the border town of Panjgur in Balochistan, Iranian state media reported, prompting strong condemnation from Islamabad and downgrading of diplomatic ties.

The Iranian strikes were part of a series of attacks carried out by Iran in recent days in Syria and Iraq as its response to recent terrorist attacks on its territory. The Iranian strikes have heightened concerns about regional stability, particularly amid ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

“Over the last several years, in our engagements with Iran, Pakistan has consistently shared its serious concerns about the safe havens and sanctuaries enjoyed by Pakistani origin terrorists calling themselves Sarmachars on the ungoverned spaces inside Iran. Pakistan also shared multiple dossiers with concrete evidence of the presence and activities of these terrorists,” the Foreign Office statement on Thursday morning said.

“However, because of lack of action on our serious concerns, these so-called Sarmachars continued to spill the blood of innocent Pakistanis with impunity. This morning’s action was taken in light of credible intelligence of impending large-scale terrorist activities by these so called Sarmachars.

“This action is a manifestation of Pakistan’s unflinching resolve to protect and defend its national security against all threats. The successful execution of this highly complex operation is also a testimony to the professionalism of the Pakistan Armed Forces.”

“Pakistan will continue to take all necessary steps to preserve the safety and security of its people which is sacrosanct, inviolable and sacred,” said MOFA.

The statement stressed that Pakistan “fully respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, adding “the sole objective of today’s act was in pursuit of Pakistan’s own security and national interest which is paramount and cannot be compromised”.

“As a responsible member of the international community, Pakistan upholds the principles and purposes of the UN Charter including territorial integrity and sovereignty of member states. Guided by these principles, and in exercise of our legitimate rights within international law, Pakistan will never allow its sovereignty and territorial integrity to be challenged, under any pretext or circumstances.

Iran is a brotherly country and the people of Pakistan have great respect and affection for the Iranian people. We have always emphasised dialogue and cooperation in confronting common challenges including the menace of terrorism and will continue to endeavour to find joint solutions.“

Airspace violation​

A day earlier, Pakistan had downgraded its diplomatic relations with Iran, recalling its ambassador from Tehran and expelling the Iranian envoy in Islamabad, in the wake of Iranian missile and drone strikes in Panjgur, Balochistan.

Foreign Office spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch had said Pakistan reserved the right to retaliate against the attack, which she described as an “illegal act” and without any justification. In both statements issued after the attack, Baloch warned Iran of the consequences of its action.

“Pakistan has decided to recall its ambassador from Iran and that the Iranian ambassador to Pakistan who is currently visiting Iran may not return for the time being,” she had said.

Besides the diplomatic response, a senior official, in a telephone conversation with Dawn, did not rule out a military response, saying that “our response was still evolving”.

Similarly, high-level bilateral visits, both ongoing as well as planned ones, were cancelled. Iranian charge d’affaires in Islamabad was also summoned to FO to convey Pakistan’s condemnation of the incident.

The Iranian strikes were perceived by Pakistan as not only a breach of sovereignty, but also a potential catalyst for broader regional conflict, which is particularly alarming in the current tense regional climate. This situation is further complicated by regional rival India, which has been leveraging the pretext of terrorism to act against Pakistan.

Diplomatic sources had also suggested that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) was responsible for the breach, and that despite the existence of multiple channels of communication between the two countries, the operation was carried out contrary to international law, which clearly violated Pakistan’s airspace.

Analysts have suggested that while a direct military response from Pakistan is possible, the episode is likely to draw Pakistan closer to Iran’s rivals as a strategic countermeasure.


This is a developing story that is being updated as the situation evolves. Initial reports in the media can sometimes be inaccurate. We will strive to ensure timeliness and accuracy by relying on credible sources such as concerned, qualified authorities and our staff reporters.

--------------------------------------------------------------------



Tehran ties downgraded in wake of cross-border attack

Baqir Sajjad Syed Published January 18, 2024 Updated about 3 hours ago




0
LISTEN TO ARTICLE1x1.2x1.5x
A SCREEN grab shows a house struck by an Iranian missile on fire in Koh-i-Sabz village.

A SCREEN grab shows a house struck by an Iranian missile on fire in Koh-i-Sabz village.

• FO says reserves right to retaliate; US condemns Iran strikes in Pakistan, Iraq and Syria; Beijing urges restraint
• Islamabad recalls its ambassador; Iranian envoy asked ‘not to return’; all high-level visits cancelled

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Wednesday downgraded its diplomatic relations with Iran, recalling its ambassador from Tehran and expelling the Iranian envoy in Islamabad, in the wake of Iranian missile and drone strikes in Panjgur, Balochistan a day earlier.
Foreign Office spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said Pakistan reserved the right to retaliate against the attack, which she described as an “illegal act” and without any justification. In both statements issued after the attack, Ms Baloch warned Iran of the consequences of its action.
“Pakistan has decided to recall its ambassador from Iran and that the Iranian ambassador to Pakistan who is currently visiting Iran may not return for the time being,” she said.
Besides the diplomatic response, a senior official, in a telephone conversation with Dawn, did not rule out a military response, saying that “our response was still evolving”.
Similarly, high-level bilateral visits, both ongoing as well as planned ones, were cancelled. Iranian charge d’affaires in Islamabad was also summoned to FO to convey Pakistan’s condemnation of the incident.
The Iranian strikes are perceived by Pakistan as not only a breach of sovereignty, but also a potential catalyst for broader regional conflict, which is particularly alarming in the current tense regional climate. This situation is further complicated by regional rival India, which has been leveraging the pretext of terrorism to act against Pakistan.
Diplomatic sources also suggested that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) was responsible for the breach, and that despite the existence of multiple channels of communication between the two countries, the operation was carried out contrary to international law, which clearly violated Pakistan’s airspace.
Analysts suggest that while a direct military response from Pakistan is possible, the episode is likely to draw Pakistan closer to Iran’s rivals as a strategic countermeasure.
Iranian strikes
The Iranian strikes, which Tehran claims targeted militant bases of Jaish al-Adl in Pakistan, were part of a series of attacks carried out by Iran in recent days in Syria and Iraq as part of its response to recent terrorist attacks on its territory. The Iranian strikes have heightened concerns about regional stability, particularly amid ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.
Last month, Iran claimed that militants from Jaish al-Adl, having crossed over from Pakistan, launched an assault on a police station in Rask, a town in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchestan province, leading to the deaths of 11 Iranian security officers. In the aftermath, Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi called upon Pakistan to end the sanctuaries of the militant group within its territory. Subsequently, Pakistan’s caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani, in discussions with his Iranian counterpart, reaffirmed Islamabad’s commitment to collaboratively addressing terrorism.
Iranian diplomats in their post-attack conversations with Pakistani officials, both in Islamabad and Tehran, tried to justify their unilateral action. FM Abdollahian publicly stated that the attack was targeted against an “Iranian terrorist group” in Pakistan and that “none of the nationals of the friendly and brotherly country of Pakistan were targeted by Iranian missiles and drones.”
He said Balochistan strikes were Iran’s response to the Rask attack.
However, this is not the first time that violence from Iran has claimed lives in Pakistan. In January 2023, four security personnel were martyred in Panjgur as a result of terrorist activities blamed on Iranian militants, while April saw another attack targeting Pakistani forces in Kech.
Tehran’s ‘damage control’ efforts
The missile and drone strikes, which occurred just a day after the Pakistani and Iranian navies conducted joint exercises in the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf and only hours after caretaker Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar’s meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian in Davos, caught Islamabad off guard.
There was no official word from the PM’s Office about the meeting, but Iranian media had said the two discussed terrorism among other issues. Iranian media said Mr Kakar underscored the importance of Tehran-Islamabad relations and expressed his country’s desire to strengthen its ties with Iran. He said the two countries were facing common challenges such as terrorism and called for joint efforts and cooperation to limit such perils.
The Iranian foreign minister reaffirmed his country’s respect for Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He, however, emphasised that Tehran would not “allow the country’s national security to be compromised”.
Later in what could be seen as Iran’s first move to lower the tensions, Mr Abdollahian called FM Jilani, who is in Kampala, Uganda, to attend the ministerial meeting of the non-aligned movement to clarify the Iranian position on the issue.
The persistent challenge of terrorist havens has long plagued relations between the two nations, with both accusing each other of failing to confront terrorist factions launching attacks from their respective territories. While there have been instances of collaboration against these militant groups, leading to some enhancement in border security, a significant trust deficit has hindered substantial cooperation allowing terrorist groups to continue their subversive activities on both sides of the border.
Pakistan has also undertaken significant measures, including fencing a large part of its border with Iran and conducting military operations against militants near the border, in efforts to control the cross-border incursion of terrorists and address Iran’s concerns about militant groups like Jaish al-Adl operating from Pakistani soil.
In light of escalating tensions, the meeting of the Joint Border Trade Committee in Chabahar was cancelled and the Pakistan delegation, which was slated to participate in the Chabahar Free Zone Festival, returned home. Gwadar Deputy Commissioner Aurangzeb Badini said the delegation came back after instructions from the federal government. In the Joint Border Trade Committee meeting, the 35-member delegation of Pakistan was led by Chief Collector Aftab Iqbal Memon.
‘Exercise restraint’
Meanwhile on Wednesday, Beijing urged both Pakistan and Iran to exercise restraint and work collaboratively to maintain peace and stability in the region.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, in a press briefing in Beijing, highlighted the importance of avoiding actions that could escalate tensions.
The call for restraint comes at a critical juncture amid growing concerns about the impact of these strikes on regional stability and bilateral relations between Iran and Pakistan.
US condemns strikes
The United States on Wednesday condemned recent Iranian strikes in Pakistan, Iraq and Syria, which Tehran has claimed were carried out against “anti-Iranian terrorist groups”.
“So we do condemn those strikes. We’ve seen Iran violate the sovereign borders of three of its neighbours in just the past couple of days,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters.
In Washington, Miller said: “I think it is a little rich for, on one hand, Iran to be the leading funder of terrorism in the region, the leading funder of instability in the region, and on the other hand, claimed that it needs to take these actions to counter terrorism.
Syed Irfan Raza in Islamabad and Saleem Shahid in Quetta also contributed to this report
Published in Dawn, January 18th, 2024
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top