Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

They can't pass Iraq from Syria. He can scream whole day about rawafid or behead some alawites while Israel bombs them and occupies their strategic lands and heights. It's also good for Iranian public to see democratic/moderate politicians of Syria.

They are your people. You have a problem with such elements. Hence the many terrorist attacks within Iran in recent years. ISIS/AQ/HTS was/is flooded by Afghans, Tajiks and Iranians as well.

Then you have the Shia terrorist variant with is just enormous. I think in Iraq alone you have created/funded 100 such terrorist gorups. God's knows how many supporters such groups have within Iran itself.

I guess this is what oppression by the Islamic Republic of Iran of its Sunni minorities does. Which is why you still can't prevent Baloch and Kurdish separatist and armed groups from operating after 45 years.

Does not fit with the propaganda of "Iran has no problems with extremists". Meanwhile your entire regime for the past 45 years has been the biggest extremists in the region (along with their co-conspiracies) Israel.

Sad state of affairs with Iran as a country also collapsing, it's economy, infrastructure, currency etc.

1 dollar equals 800.000 Iranian money now (forget the currency, Tomaan, Riyal or Dinar)?

Very unfortunate, now Iran helped destabilize so many countries in the Middle East and now eventually it will implode itself and further destabilize the region.

Not good.

I think Pahlavi rule again could be a solution.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I don't know anything about this guy but at least he speaks sense, unlike the Mullah's who have done nothing but mischief for the past 45 years in the region.
 
Last edited:
Hard to believe that Kissinger being a Zionist Jew would think of stopping arms supplies to Israel.
Reagan was tough with Begin during Israel's attack on Lebanon, even using the word 'holocaust'. GHW Bush stopped loan guarantees for settlement construction. It was only after 9/11 that the politics became decidedly one sided.

 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Strength in this case is a function of military power, and economic power and politicial alliance making power.

In military, both parties are equal (well Turkey has a large edge overall once you factor in the army and navy, not just "airpower" where Israel may have the edge ). On economic power, Turkey is bigger economically with a more diverse economy. As for political power, well no one wants to deal with Israel or Netanyahu since the Gaza Genocide, the "punative" attacks on civilians in Lebanon for israeli military losses and of course the land grabs in Syria aswell as wide scale boming of Syria, so Turkey wins that hands down.

I therefore call Turkey the "winner".

Can we not have further instability/war then ? Please ?
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Beautiful.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


One of the greatest things about the liberation of Syria is that foreign, non-Islamic and hostile institutions are being rehabilitated and destroyed permanently. Looking forward to the same procedure being repeated in occupied Northern Yemen and Iraq.
 
Last edited:
The Mazar-i Sherif of Hazret-i Bilal (RA), the first Muazzin of the Islamic world, has been opened to the public. It was closed during the ASSAD regime, the progenies of Abu Jahils....

Here is the video. Please offer an Al Fatiha....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
They are your people. You have a problem with such elements. Hence the many terrorist attacks within Iran in recent years. ISIS/AQ/HTS was/is flooded by Afghans, Tajiks and Iranians as well.

Then you have the Shia terrorist variant with is just enormous. I think in Iraq alone you have created/funded 100 such terrorist gorups. God's knows how many supporters such groups have within Iran itself.

I guess this is what oppression by the Islamic Republic of Iran of its Sunni minorities does. Which is why you still can't prevent Baloch and Kurdish separatist and armed groups from operating after 45 years.

Does not fit with the propaganda of "Iran has no problems with extremists". Meanwhile your entire regime for the past 45 years has been the biggest extremists in the region (along with their co-conspiracies) Israel.

Sad state of affairs with Iran as a country also collapsing, it's economy, infrastructure, currency etc.

1 dollar equals 800.000 Iranian money now (forget the currency, Tomaan, Riyal or Dinar)?

Very unfortunate, now Iran helped destabilize so many countries in the Middle East and now eventually it will implode itself and further destabilize the region.

Not good.

I think Pahlavi rule again could be a solution.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I don't know anything about this guy but at least he speaks sense, unlike the Mullah's who have done nothing but mischief for the past 45 years in the region.

Salafism/wahabism or even hanbali Islam where these extremist schools originate from are not from Iran. They're related to Saudi Arabia and Qatar or individuals from Persian Gulf states who sponsor these thoughts. Everywhere where sufi Islam was active, they activated salafism and sent money, "scholars" etc there under cover of cultural activities to "re-educate" these people bout Islam.

But the backlash against imposing these strange and strict thoughts will also come from locals.. after 50 years afghanistan and central Asia or any other region will reject these nonsense in age of technology and AI and put any beard with these ideas in a mental clinic. Lets get Asia and world rid of it, the better. Now they show their intentions and actions, in the future people reject it.

People of Iran will solve their problem, no need for pahlavi or israeli fags, we will keep our independence and hopefully create nuclear weapons.
 
The Mazar-i Sherif of Hazret-i Mohiuddin Ibn Arabi (RA) has been liberated too and opened to the public. They were left to rot by the ASSAD regime....

Al Fatiha....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Salafism/wahabism or even hanbali Islam where these extremist schools originate from are not from Iran. They're related to Saudi Arabia and Qatar or individuals from Persian Gulf states who sponsor these thoughts. Everywhere where sufi Islam was active, they activated salafism and sent money, "scholars" etc there under cover of cultural activities to "re-educate" these people bout Islam.

But the backlash against imposing these strange and strict thoughts will also come from locals.. after 50 years afghanistan and central Asia or any other region will reject these nonsense in age of technology and AI and put any beard with these ideas in a mental clinic. Lets get Asia and world rid of it, the better. Now they show their intentions and actions, in the future people reject it.

People of Iran will solve their problem, no need for pahlavi or israeli fags, we will keep our independence and hopefully create nuclear weapons.
Whatever, you can blame Arabia for everything, as Islam itself and all its main sects (Sunni or Shia) originate from there, including Sufism. Which btw. is g** and nothing even remotely comparable to what it was once or supposed to be. Hence it being almost non-existent nowadays. With good reason.

That includes all religions then, as per you logic. We will see.

I don't see much hope for Iran under the Mullah's. It is a country in steady and at times rapid decline. This is great news for the region.

You don't have independence currently, did not under the Shah and likely won't in the future either. Same with nuclear weapons.

BTW, your own people apparently willingly chose Shia Islamic fundamentalism. Embraced it and have accepted it and cultivated It for 45 years. You even support it from the Netherlands here.

Same story with Afghanistan, they chose the Taliban twice. Nobody imposed anything upon both of you.

Reality is that Taliban is a local Pashtun movement as is their interpretation of Islam. Same with the Mullah's in Iran. Those are your creations, don't blame it on others.

KSA had a problem with a group of fundamentalist Hanbalis. This was dealt with almost 10 years ago now. Now there is no problem. Nothing stops you from doing the same. MbS did not embrace that small minority within KSA. Instead he jailed them and reformed them.

You can chose to continue with your Mullah's, the 54 year old Pahlavi dynasty or whatever, my sole worry is that your regime/entity don't spread their terrorism around the region like for the past 45 years and opportunistic meddling in war-torn countries of the region. Not much to ask for, I believe.

Seems that most Iranians agree with me judging by the popularity of your regime which seems to be on its last legs.
 
Last edited:
Hakan Fidan's interview with Al Jazeera. Straight questions, straight answers.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Final sentence was punctual. "Iran's presence in Syria didn't stopped the Israeli genocide in Gaza"
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Whatever, you can blame Arabia for everything, as Islam itself and all its main sects (Sunni or Shia) originate from there, including Sufism. Which btw. is g** and nothing even remotely comparable to what it was once or supposed to be. Hence it being almost non-existent nowadays. With good reason.

That includes all religions then, as per you logic. We will see.

I don't see much hope for Iran under the Mullah's. It is a country in steady and at times rapid decline. This is great news for the region.

You don't have independence currently, did not under the Shah and likely won't in the future either. Same with nuclear weapons.

BTW, your own people apparently willingly chose Shia Islamic fundamentalism. Embraced it and have accepted it and cultivated It for 45 years. You even support it from the Netherlands here.

Same story with Afghanistan, they chose the Taliban twice. Nobody imposed anything upon both of you.

Reality is that Taliban is a local Pashtun movement as is their interpretation of Islam. Same with the Mullah's in Iran. Those are your creations, don't blame it on others.

KSA had a problem with a group of fundamentalist Hanbalis. This was dealt with almost 10 years ago now. Now there is no problem. Nothing stops you from doing the same. MbS did not embrace that small minority within KSA. Instead he jailed them and reformed them.

You can chose to continue with your Mullah's, the 54 year old Pahlavi dynasty or whatever, my sole worry is that your regime/entity don't spread their terrorism around the region like for the past 45 years and opportunistic meddling in war-torn countries of the region. Not much to ask for, I believe.

Seems that most Iranians agree with me judging by the popularity of your regime which seems to be on its last legs.
Whatever you say or hope, you will have to deal with neighbour Yemen which you bombed to hell and they will become 150 million people in a devestated country, looking for food, just like Syria being the neighboor of Turkey.

I don't think Jennifer Lopez shaking it in land of Islam and Nabi (a.s) will be a long term solution for your saudi regime (named after a tribe).

Yemen is independent from Iran and their independent policy will continue, Saudi Arabia could only change that by winning against them through war (good luck). Even if Islamic republic disappears, Yemen and its policy will continue.

At least we didnt bomb Afghanistan or Tajikistan to hell, so our responsibility towards them is less heavy. If they want al-qaida like government they can have it, after 40 years new generations reject it. So saudi gains are very short.
 
Just accept for once that the Al-Assad regime was the by far most barbarian and bloody part in the civil war
No,I can't accept that. I've seen too much from the other side that makes me feel disgusted and I've seen more good from the SAA side.
 
There was no HTS in Southern Syria and Damascus when it was liberated by Syrians. It was mostly the work of FSA and Druze. Are they also "AQ/ISIS" in your eyes.:ROFLMAO:
Daraa and the south had always been a place of rebels since the beginning of the war


Why did 200.000 + SAA soldiers join "AQ/ISIS" without a fight and even joined "AQ/ISIS" during the later liberations of most of Syria?
Where did you get these statistics and info?


Meanwhile the guy and regime you have wasted so many posts and hours on supporting as a Greek (this is even more strange, I would understand if you were a Syrian or an Arab) FLED as COWARDS to Russia and Iran.
And you yourself saw in many posts that this was more complicated than just "run away". That everyone and especially the Russians,were making deals with others. Iranians,Russians,Turks,Israelis,Syrians,
they were all making deals with each other. And in the end,the whole place started collapsing.



Ending it here, as it makes no sense to continue. We won't agree on the Al-Assad regime ever.
We won't agree and we won't agree on the new one as well.
 
Whatever you say or hope, you will have to deal with neighbour Yemen which you bombed to hell and they will become 150 million people in a devestated country, looking for food, just like Syria being the neighboor of Turkey.

I don't think Jennifer Lopez shaking it in land of Islam and Nabi (a.s) will be a long term solution for your saudi regime (named after a tribe).

Yemen is independent from Iran and their independent policy will continue, Saudi Arabia could only change that by winning against them through war (good luck). Even if Islamic republic disappears, Yemen and its policy will continue.

At least we didnt bomb Afghanistan or Tajikistan to hell, so our responsibility towards them is less heavy. If they want al-qaida like government they can have it, after 40 years new generations reject it. So saudi gains are very short.
Good that you follow Arab demographics. This way you will know already that the era of opportunistic meddling of foreigners in unstable/war-torn Arab countries won't end well. US experienced this in Iraq not long ago. You experienced it in Syria just a few weeks ago after losing 6000 Iranians and 50 + billion USD.

Yemenis as a people are closer to Saudi Arabians than any other people, along with Omanis. We never had any major wars or problems but mostly always lived in peace until the Houthi cult (30 + year old cult) emerged. Just like millions of Yemenis live peacefully alongside us.

Nobody bombs anyone other than Houthi terrorists and a few, unfortunate, collateral damage as in any war, because the Houthis hide among civilians, hospitals and what not. There are many videos that confirm this online.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


No systematic killings either. That is not how we operate. We leave indiscriminate barrel bombings to the Iranian regime and its allies.

You see, KSA locked up and dealt with its minority of vocal and influential extremists/fundamentalists that interpreted Islam in a restrictive, wrong and harmful way for the people and country. Now for the past 7-8 years KSA has returned to normalcy as prior to 1979. This is why entertainment, music, world class international sporting events from MMA, boxing, football, Formula 1, tennis, e-sports (list is long) is being hosted with widespread popular support. This is why you can now find women wearing niqab's next to women not wearing headscarfs. Each minding their own business while being respectful and dressing respectfully. Enjoying the same entertainment from watching football, music, art, tourist attractions or whatever. Like in any other normal Muslim country. Like it always was the case.

KSA now has more women working in the workforce than most countries of the region. One of the most educated populations as well. Nobody accepts being hijacked by a few dinosaurs any longer. From the ruler (MbS) to the average people, of which 2/3 are under 30.

This is the same, I believe, everywhere in the Arab and Muslim world. Most people do not accept extremists hijacking their countries and lives.

No, they won't because no sane educated Yemeni in Northern Yemen looks at the incompetent Houthi terrorist cult as people to emulate or their incompetent rule that has given Yemen nothing but misery. Unfortunately an entire generation that has not known anything else has been born but eventually they will notice and see what other parts of Yemen (in development) looks like and they will demand the same. As well as the technological development of the world will make people question such failed regimes. Similarly as what is happening in Iran right now. A non-religious young Iranian, I do not believe that he is very supportive of the Iranian Mullah's wasting 50+ billions of dollars on failed projects in the Arab and Muslim world.

What gains? KSA places no importance on tiny Tajikistan or Afghanistan geopolitically. We have no hostility to Tajiks or Afghans (many live in KSA) and most of them look favorable at KSA and Arabs. Many historic and cultural ties as well for well-known reasons. Same majority sect (Sunni Islam) and overall understanding.

As for whether Afghans want to be ruled by Taliban as currently and before or Tajiks want to be ruled by communist dictators (as for the past 30 years) this is as always up to them and none of my business.

Unlike the Iranian regime, we don't want to force failed regimes/terrorist groups upon anyone. At most we voice our opinions on regime x or y, as I have done with the failed and murderous Al-Assad regime, but nobody imposed themselves on Syrias even when he was around.

On the contrary, the pragmatic MbS invited him back to the Arab League and normalized ties, not out of love for the Al-Assad regime, but for the sake of Syria and Syrians and to help them end their political and economic isolation.

As a final statement, having met several Iranians in Makkah, Madinah and in GCC states and in the West, Arabs and Iranians (regular people, especially neighboring Arabs), have no reason for any hostilities.

The only problem (main one) in our recent relationship has been your Mullah regime. As everyone is well aware of, including most non pro-Mullah Iranians.

For instance, I just watched the arguably most famous Iranian foodie on Youtube (Mister Taster) food tour in KSA. Not to my surprise (actually) his most viewed video is from KSA.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


And from what I could see and his comments during the videos, there were many similarities just in food alone.

Anyway we are off topic, so ending it here.

Just a final advice, tell your Mullah regime to stop this destructive and opportunistic meddling in war-torn/unstable Arab countries. You just saw how such projects end (Syria). Similarly will be the case with Northern Yemen (Houthis). Mark my words.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top