Turkey Syria - News & Updates

Bro Ignore this guy, he is literally Greek Squidward looking out the window upset, as Turks and Sryian Brothers are celebrating.

View attachment 90183
Yeah, many Syrians are very happy with Turkiye's role , except the small minority or Assadist. I think deep down he is upset at well it's all going.
 
Syrian Money from Syrian businessmen invested in Syria. you just mad cuz Idlib is doing well economically. its funny people were comparing the people from the SAA controlled countryside flooding to Idlib to do shopping after the regime fell as something akin to the Berlin Wall falling and East Germans flooding into West Germany to buy western products. lol, nothing to do with Saudi, Turkey or Qatar. Those rebels managed to have better economic management than the Assadist system of state control and family patronage.
1.Why would I be mad?
2.Idlib was piss poor,suddenly "syrian buisenessmen invested in Syria". Money fell from the sky. What was this buiseness?
3.Saudi Arabia,Qatar and Turkey poured money in and if you deny that,you're either willingly in denial or just naive.
4.I asked you what do you find funny enough to "lol"
 
1.Why would I be mad?
2.Idlib was piss poor,suddenly "syrian buisenessmen invested in Syria". Money fell from the sky. What was this buiseness?
3.Saudi Arabia,Qatar and Turkey poured money in and if you deny that,you're either willingly in denial or just naive.
4.I asked you what do you find funny enough to "lol"


We should wish Syria well.

Assad is now gone and so if these countries want to pour money in and it raises the living standards of the average Syrian, then all good. Of course they will extract their price in terms of monetary, strategic and/or political profit.

Syria will be broken up now and the vast majority of Syrians living under HTS will need a lot of outside aid to make any living.

Kurds and the new "citizens" of the Zionist entity will be just fine due to US taxpayer and Syrian oil wealth.
 
I am struggling to see what's the problem with that?
Many nations had an empire once upon a time. They can't all get involved in modern countries' affairs. You don't have a right to do that. If the West did that you'd say it's imperialism and colonialism.
 
We should wish Syria well.

Assad is now gone and so if these countries want to pour money in and it raises the living standards of the average Syrian, then all good. Of course they will extract their price in terms of monetary, strategic and/or political profit.

Syria will be broken up now and the vast majority of Syrians living under HTS will need a lot of outside aid to make any living.

Kurds and the new "citizens" of the Zionist entity will be just fine due to US taxpayer and Syrian oil wealth.
Sure,but it's ridiculous seeing Turks go like "OH MY LOOK HOW ADVANCED AND MODERN IDLIB IS!" as if the poor,downtrodden Muslims of that supposedly isolated pocket found treasure and suddenly they are ahead of everyone.

Come on,they don't have to pretend. It's not a shame to say "Yes,Turkey gave money there,Saudi Arabia poured money there,Qatar donated money there".
 
Many nations had an empire once upon a time.
You don't say :ROFLMAO:
They can't all get involved in modern countries' affairs.
If the said modern country refuse to remove Kurdish terrorists then we will get involved
You don't have a right to do that.
Who are you to decide if its right or not?
If the West did that you'd say it's imperialism and colonialism.
I don't care what West does
 
Sure,but it's ridiculous seeing Turks go like "OH MY LOOK HOW ADVANCED AND MODERN IDLIB IS!" as if the poor,downtrodden Muslims of that supposedly isolated pocket found treasure and suddenly they are ahead of everyone.

Come on,they don't have to pretend. It's not a shame to say "Yes,Turkey gave money there,Saudi Arabia poured money there,Qatar donated money there".


Yes as if it was just Assad's nepotism and corruption that kept the rest of Syria down all these years.

What magic could he have pulled if the US/Kurds stole Syria's oil and the Turks/Arabs joined in with western sanctions?

Before the civil war no Syrian was seen in Europe apart from a few students and some tourists.
 
Sure,but it's ridiculous seeing Turks go like "OH MY LOOK HOW ADVANCED AND MODERN IDLIB IS!"
what to know whats more ridiculous? You having a cry about Syria going to be destroyed and ruined and Syrians themselves are happy with the change.
 
Who are you to decide if its right or not?
I don't care what West does
The second sentence confirms the first one. In a democracy Foinikas can tell whatever he wants.
You are not Erdogan and this is not Turkey. Ok?.
 
The second sentence confirms the first one. In a democracy Foinikas can tell whatever he wants.
You are not Erdogan and this is not Turkey. Ok?.
We will interfere , intervene and remove who we deem threat to our security. This is what any self respecting leader does for his country. Ok?
 
We will interfere , intervene and remove who we deem threat to our security. This is what any self respecting leader does for his country. Ok?


How on earth was Assad a threat to Turkey?
 
Yes I know but the closest "successor" state to Mughals is going to be BD as it shares the same religion and accounted for half of it's wealth.

Buddy you still didn't tell me about your opinions on the Toppling of Sheikh Haseena and the Awami League, and here you are claiming the mantle of the Moghuls? lol
 
The annoying thing with Erdogan is that he believes he has the right to interfere and intervene in what he perceives as the "Ottoman world". That's like saying Greece has the right to interfere in the former Byzantine world,Italy in the entire Roman world,Pakistan in the former Mughal Empire territory etc. etc.
'oTtOmAn eMpIrE'
'iMpErIaLiSm'
'CoLoNiAlIsM'
'nEo oTtOmAnIsM'

That's all I hear from you and, frankly, it's annoying because it so unbelievably hypocritical, insincere and self-righteous. Whenever Türkiye pushes trough to safeguard her national interests, it's 'oTtOmAnIsM' or 'IsLaMiSm'.

It doesn't really matter who's in charge. We could have a government full of self-declared technocratic Atheists and you guys would still use the same arguments.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top