Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Then fire 1,500.
Problem solved.
I assume they're costly to build. And Iran doesn't have giant stores of them that people are thinking. Ballistic Missiles are probably more of a deterrent. To show technology of missiles that could be fitted with nuclear warheads in future.
 
I think you misunderstand me. The IR wanted to deplete israel with cheaper missiles to ensure that the fattah and more advanced missiles can get through
the point of the Fattah is to defeat the ABM system without needing 100 older missiles to deplete ABM systems first

otherwise you are better off going the other way round so that the heavier missiles can impact rather than those with smaller warheads like Fattah and KS (no evidence Fattah was used in TP2 by the way)
 
The problem is of accuracy - ie being able to destroy things that will hurt. Iran lacks that capability compared to Israel..
Just because you've not seen Iran strike Israel with accuracy means Iran can't do it? That's false and inconsistent logic- all middle east players act afraid once they feel Iran Is about to fire BMs at them,including US- that proves something. Iran's missile threat isn't based mainly on bluffing and intimidation.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yemen's Houthis now are playing a huge role... Hezbollah-Israel ceasefire to end soon...

What is the strategic situation for Iran to launch TP3? Even if Trump becomes President, the US military power doesn't suddenly increase overnight, so if TP3 is to be launched, the timing is before Trump's inauguration.

A big war will hurt Israel more, as they still haven't fully wiped out Hezbollah and the Houthis and are about to challenge Iran 1vs3. Sure, the US will make it 2vs3, but the US can't pour all resources into the Iran war, because they have to keep forces against Russia and China, so I think Iran can win this war if they are willing to take casualties for it.

The problem is Gulf countries and Saudi which have substantial air forces and can coordinate with USAF. Iran can win easily if it can make Arab Sunnis side with it, but how?
 
Yemen's Houthis now are playing a huge role... Hezbollah-Israel ceasefire to end soon...

What is the strategic situation for Iran to launch TP3? Even if Trump becomes President, the US military power doesn't suddenly increase overnight, so if TP3 is to be launched, the timing is before Trump's inauguration.

A big war will hurt Israel more, as they still haven't fully wiped out Hezbollah and the Houthis and are about to challenge Iran 1vs3. Sure, the US will make it 2vs3, but the US can't pour all resources into the Iran war, because they have to keep forces against Russia and China, so I think Iran can win this war if they are willing to take casualties for it.

The problem is Gulf countries and Saudi which have substantial air forces and can coordinate with USAF. Iran can win easily if it can make Arab Sunnis side with it, but how?

With respect to most Arab airforces....Their airforce is American.
America can probably make their whole airforce dysfunctional....I.e. planted computer glitch or kill switch. Or perhaps even the plane will simply refuse to fire on "friendly" aircraft...?..

They'll obviously do it in a sophisticated way so as to make it look like a routine failure or operator error or will simply say Israel shot them down.

I know posters have laughed at this idea stating if they do that nobody will ever buy from them again....but there are adequate "countermeasures" to ensure nobody will ever find out.
 
I know posters have laughed at this idea stating if they do that nobody will ever buy from them again....but there are adequate "countermeasures" to ensure nobody will ever find out.


These countries don't buy from the US out of choice but need.
 
With respect to most Arab airforces....Their airforce is American.
America can probably make their whole airforce dysfunctional....I.e. planted computer glitch or kill switch. Or perhaps even the plane will simply refuse to fire on "friendly" aircraft...?..

Do you think Arab’s care? Why would they ever go against the #1 superpower in the world? That would be suicidal for them:

And the closest thing to a challenger to America is China. And guess what? They have great relations there as well!

America is supplying Saudi Arabia Air Force while China supplies Saudi Arabia with long range missiles and uranium enrichment! Best of both worlds!

Meanwhile Iran cannot buy a screwdriver from China or Russia. And obviously nothing from America.

So again, I ask you. Do you think Arabs care?
 
What is the strategic situation for Iran to launch TP3? Even if Trump becomes President, the US military power doesn't suddenly increase overnight, so if TP3 is to be launched, the timing is before Trump's inauguration.

Iran is running out of time (about 3 weeks) to do TP3. If it does TP3 during Trump, it runs the risk of Trump ego getting hurt and him ordering something to make him seem manly. (Last time he ordered assasination of Solemani and Yemen Quds Force General, the latter survived the attack).

Who knows maybe Iran will conduct TP3 during Trump admin precisely to embarrass him.

Personally whether Iran does or doesn’t do TP3, the reality on the ground won’t change from it. The other side will certainly respond and then Iran will have to do conduct TP4. So iran knows it will have to be side that doesn’t respond to the other either now (ie don’t do TP3) or in the future if these tit for tat punches continue between Israel and Iran.
 
I assume they're costly to build. And Iran doesn't have giant stores of them that people are thinking. Ballistic Missiles are probably more of a deterrent. To show technology of missiles that could be fitted with nuclear warheads in future.

Depends, I would say a Shahab-3 derivative missile probably cost Iran around $100,000. And the most advanced missiles (Qassem missile, Fatah-1, Khorramshahr) closer to $1M or more.

The costs are mostly tied to the warhead maneuverability and the gyroscope tech used with the most advanced gyros costing a good amount of money to achieve <CEP below 25m and in case of Khorramshahr the engine since it’s a newer reverse engineered engine vs Shahab-3 no-dong engine that has been produced since 2000 or F-110 based engines produced since 2008.
 
it's all well documented and widely accepted in professional circles that don't rely on unsourced propaganda claims

c. 30-35 impacts at Nevatim (corroborated by the videos from the day where we count c. 30 impacts):

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


at least 8 impacts seen at Tel Nof air base:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


2 other missiles landed in Tel Aviv, one was 500m from Mossad HQ and one hit side of a road:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


these are all the missile impacts we have any form of visual evidence of. around 40 in total. not to say that more impacts are impossible but these line up with Iranian statements of their targets and nothing else was caught on video or revealed in satellite imagery.

source of 180 ballistic missiles being fired in total:



now ask those who disagree to substantiate their claims that there were more impacts. they will not be able to (and I doubt they will even try, they just like to sling mud at others).

first of all , I do not believe that 180 missiles were fired. I reckon it was around 100.

why are we taking it as a fact that 180 missiles were fired? where is the evidence behind this besides sum sources? Of course the west will try to ratchet up the number of missiles fired in order to demonstrate a higher interception rate.
 
first of all , I do not believe that 180 missiles were fired. I reckon it was around 100.
iranian generals said they fired 200 missiles. Israel said it was around 200 missiles.

but happy to see your evidence for 100 missiles.
 
I look at the craters by Ttp-1 and tp-2 and it is sorta looking like the warheads may have been in the lesser yield to maybe not make Israel escalate? Could be why it took so long to launch TP-1 and TP-2 replacing the real warheads with lesser ones?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I look at the craters by Ttp-1 and tp-2 and it is sorta looking like the warheads may have been in the lesser yield to maybe not make Israel escalate? Could be why it took so long to launch TP-1 and TP-2 replacing the real warheads with lesser ones?
some of the craters were much bigger than others (the one 500m from Mossad HQ seemed large)

the one that destroyed 2 air force hangars in Nevatim (and probably a few aircraft) was also large

but some seemed tiny and likely malfunctioned

others seemed small because (i) warheads were 300-500kg and (ii) the type of surface they impact on has a major impact on the size of the crater
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top