Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

These guys really thinks that 90% of the Syrian people were happy with Assad. Why would the half of the country fled then to other countries?

I didnt see any pro-Assad protests in Syria till this day since HTS took over. And alle the refugees are rushing back to their homes in Syria.

They are deluded, They live in their own insulated bubble shia "resistance" bubbles and think they somehow have a pulse on the overwhelming majority of the Muslim world which is sunni. I'll give the point that a significant amount don't have a strong opinion one way or the other, but that has more to do with lack of familiarity with Syria, which opinions more like, oh I think there is a war there, and I hope it stops or something generic like that. Of the People that actually follow Syria, amongst the Sunnis, the General opinion is positive towards the opposition and negative towards Assad.

He keeps saying 90% Non Turks No sectarian Arabs. But the reality is that after the regime fell in several countries there were celebrations of solidarity with the green syrian flag, I have yet to see any protests with the red baathist flag. Really outside of Iran, Shia parts of Iran and Shia areas of Lebanon, there is just no presence.

Its also quite ironic that the two guys liking his posts about 90% of Muslim opinions is some Greek Guy and a Non Muslim Iranian who himself is not even Shia.
 
Sisi overthrew a democratically elected president and then viciously suppressed protests to his coup.

Hold elections and we see who who has higher pull.

Elections would replace Sisi undoutably as they did Mubarak.
Why don't you talk about the 30 june protest where millions protested against Morsi and the rule of MB. Everytime, you guys forget about the manifestation/protest agaisnt Morsi. El Sisi didn't do it because he wanted to do it but because it was the people's will (ofc there is he wanted to remove MB rule but also there is people's will, just see the timeline)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

None of those images are post assad and all of them are astroturf of largely alawite regime supporters being gathered by the regime itself for PR purposes.

The Syrian opposition rallies themselves have been spread throughout Syria unlike these concentrated in Damascus or the coasts, concentrated with regime supporters.

The mere fact that none of these people were willing to die fighting for Assad is testament enough for his lack of support.
 
He didn't bend the knee because he never said that he is against him. Plus there is a cordial ties between them because Ahmed El Sharaa said that Syria will not be a ground to meddle in other countries affairs (to start a revolution etc...). And Ahmed El Sharaa respected his words when he arrested Ahmed Mansour (egyptian rebel who wanted a revolution in Egypt). The egyptian goverement was just cautious. That is a big difference. Plus Egypt was in the Riyad Summit to relief sanctions on Syria and to have a national unity.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Sisi supported Assad, he was certainly against it. Now he is trying to make the best of the situation.
 
Why don't you talk about the 30 june protest where millions protested against Morsi and the rule of MB. Everytime, you guys forget about the manifestation/protest agaisnt Morsi. El Sisi didn't do it because he wanted to do it but because it was the people's will (ofc there is he wanted to remove MB rule but also there is people's will, just see the timeline)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Protests orchestrated by the Military itself as part of the Gulf led counter revolution wave pushed by the UAE and Saudi, so set the conditions for the coup.

Just hold elections, see who gets elected. lol
 
What sort of peace are you speaking of? they want a return to the ceasefire from the 1970s. Which was the status quo that existed with the Regime.

thats incorrect.

90% lmao, You just made up a number and project stuff on to it. Maybe 90% of Shias maybe. Not 90% of Sunnis. Sunni opinions ranges from either support of the revolution, to general indifference b/c they don't follow politics of Syria. Where is this support for Assad and labeling of the Syrian opposition as Zio whatever.


Literally no neutral(non sectarian) Muslim likes the Turk-HTS takeover of Syria.

Both are seen as Zio-US puppets doing their bidding.

This forum should be more than enough evidence for those whose eyes are wide open.
 
Literally no neutral(non sectarian) Muslim likes the Turk-HTS takeover of Syria.

Both are seen as Zio-US puppets doing their bidding.

This forum should be more than enough evidence for those whose eyes are wide open.

"literally no Neural"

And who is that? you? "Neutral"?

Yes and anyone opposed to policies of Iran in Syria is automatically "sectarian". lol what a joke.
 
Ya Foinikas, the majority of syrians didn't want Bashar. The problem of Syria is because of him and his bloody repressions. Bashar is no good. He must have stepped out in the beginning of the revolution or at least respect some of the people's demand. He was a bloody dictator and he didn't care about Syrians.
 
Its also quite ironic that the two guys liking his posts about 90% of Muslim opinions is some Greek Guy and a Non Muslim Iranian who himself is not even Shia.
It's also ironic how a guy from America is obsessed with defending every Turkish expansionist policy and decision :)
 
He didn't bend the knee because he never said that he is against him. Plus there is a cordial ties between them because Ahmed El Sharaa said that Syria will not be a ground to meddle in other countries affairs (to start a revolution etc...). And Ahmed El Sharaa respected his words when he arrested Ahmed Mansour (egyptian rebel who wanted a revolution in Egypt). The egyptian goverement was just cautious. That is a big difference. Plus Egypt was in the Riyad Summit to relief sanctions on Syria and to have a national unity.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

They already are turkey being one of its backers seems to be moving in troops to go against the Kurds if the videos of troops moving into Syria are true an internal issue regarding one Syria but like I said we will wait and see what happens
 
Ya Foinikas, the majority of syrians didn't want Bashar. The problem of Syria is because of him and his bloody repressions. Bashar is no good. He must have stepped out in the beginning of the revolution or at least respect some of the people's demand. He was a bloody dictator and he didn't care about Syrians.
Problematic regime,but stable,more peaceful government that protected Christians,Shia and the culture and civilization of Syria. Now wtf is left? Jihadis who proclaimed "Emirates" have taken power and turned Syria into a full Turkish vassal State.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top