KingQamaR
Elite Member
Raising there flags without fear of being shot at. Suddenly they want a truce Russia should continue hammering them.
Russia-Ukraine War - News, Discussions & Updates
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
- Status
Raising there flags without fear of being shot at. Suddenly they want a truce Russia should continue hammering them.
SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
Dear Everything stems from the original commitment that NATO would not expand eastward. Russia’s actions in 2014 and beyond might never have happened if NATO had not pushed toward its borders. Moscow repeatedly warned that Ukraine was a red line. So why did Ukraine invite Western forces? Why did it pursue NATO membership, knowing the risks?
Even now, after being abandoned by the West, why doesn’t Ukraine change course—align with Russia, distance itself from the Western bloc, and reclaim its lost territory? Ukraine once had security guarantees from the U.S., the U.K., and Russia in exchange for giving up its nuclear weapons. But if the U.S. is now backing away from its commitments, why shouldn’t Ukraine do the same? It could shift toward Russia to secure its land, arguing that since the West failed to uphold its promises, Ukraine owes it nothing in return.
This would also prevent Ukraine from surrendering its valuable resources to the U.S and have a higher chance to get its land back. At present, the U.S. demands 50% of Ukraine’s mineral wealth, yet it offers neither a concrete path to reclaim lost land nor guarantees for Ukraine’s future security.
And Yes
never give up nuclear weapons,
never trust foreign powers
never trust empty shit speeches
Viet
VIP Member
there is a slang in chinese language:
once water is shed it’s impossible to put it back into the cup.
very possible if Ukraine did not turn to the west, or if the Nato did not expand, then this war would not happen.
or very possible
Ukraine would be subject to russian aggression no matter whatever Ukraine does or does not.
you may end up 50:50.
SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
What about now? They are still loosing their land, their minerals and already lost many lives.
Viet
VIP Member
Ukraine is in hopeless situation.
whatever Ukraine does or does not matters zero.
mineral?
lands?
lives?
the russians have the largest landmass, largest minerals, hundreds of millions people what makes the difference if they take some minerals or lands or people in ukraine?
why should they care of some russian separatists in donbas?
Putin is much a russian psycho. he is mad because his wife runs away. now he wants to kill her and all the kids.
F-22Raptor
Elite Member
F-22Raptor
Elite Member
The US easily. Economically and militarily, and Ukraine has chosen independence from Russia.
Also, there’s no legally binding agreement that NATO would never expand eastward. Those nations have chosen NATO and western alignment. They don’t want to go back to Russian oppression
F-22Raptor
Elite Member
Soldier35
Registered Member
The Ukrainian army has started using a new UAS SETH attack drone. The drones were given to the servicemen by the charity foundation "Turn Alive". Visually, the drone is a smaller copy of the Russian Geran drones. The UAS SETH drone is reportedly easy to operate and has automatic targeting, but judging by the video, the drone's targeting is adjusted. The UAS SETH drone has a short flight range and is designed to hit targets in the frontline zone. Technical details are unknown.
SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
Ukraine would have remained fully independent, maintaining control over its entire territory and resources, without war, had it not given up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for U.S. and U.K. guarantees—commitments that the U.S. is not upholding today.
Asif
Registered Member
USA needs the ceasefire not for Ukrainians but for USA to reinforce the ukranians.. prepare them and arm them to the teeth so the war can stop at the current borders. this essentially means the maximum number of minerals and mines that can benefit USA for yrs to come.
Ukrainians end up being a puppet for USA while retaining the chest thumping rights to taking on the mighty bear and USA walks off with their mineral deal.
Russians wud be smart to see this unless they foresee a bleak future and declining economy, and testing morale of the forces (unlikely)
Ukrainians end up being a puppet for USA while retaining the chest thumping rights to taking on the mighty bear and USA walks off with their mineral deal.
Russians wud be smart to see this unless they foresee a bleak future and declining economy, and testing morale of the forces (unlikely)
Nuffle
Registered Member
There is no reason for Russia to accept a ceasefire. The only reason to accept a ceasefire is if the Russian situation is as desperate as the Ukrainian one, preventing them from continuing the conflict. After all, the line has not moved significantly for over a year. But if the pause is only to continue the conflict 30 days later, it would be completely unfavorable for the Russians.
The truth is that the US is desperate to end the war. The US is striving at all costs to end the Ukrainian conflict before the fall - otherwise the anti-Chinese architecture in Asia will begin to crumble before our eyes and there will be no effective containment of China.
Trump has fallen into the trap of an unbreakable Russian-Chinese partnership: instead of a docile Russia - its army is driving the Ukrainians out of Kursk and has probably agreed to support China and is preparing to withdraw the rest of Ukraine by the summer - China is also not thinking of giving in under the pressure of increased tariffs. China has not noticed these tariffs – that’s what the statistics show so far.
The US hoped to deter Russia worldwide by April and concentrate its fists against China by the fall. In reality, a collapse may be underway, and the ominous silence will end when the front in Ukraine begins to crumble. China will begin another exercise in blocking Taiwan, and the Americans will simply have nothing to say or do.
Who would enter into a coalition with such a country for an offensive operation against China? No one.
Ё-МАЁ
Registered Member
In the opinion of political analyst Sergey Skachko, talks on a temporary truce with Kiev may indeed start, except that their outcome will not be what supporters of the Kiev regime expect.
‘They are likely to take place because Russia cannot afford reputational losses. Moscow will try to be portrayed as a supporter of war by hijacking its peacekeeping agenda. Say, look, Ukraine and the US have agreed, but Russia doesn't want to. Therefore, in order to comply with diplomatic politeness, to support the image of a peacemaker and so on, it will have to participate in the negotiations,’ the expert told aif.ru.
‘Especially the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio openly admitted that the Ukrainian conflict is a proxy war between the US and Russia. Without negotiations, it is impossible to change relations between our countries.
Negotiations are definitely needed, whether Ukraine will be there or it will be used only as an excuse, it is important to move the position from the dead point, and not to stand on the position of confrontation,’ the political analyst summarised.
‘They are likely to take place because Russia cannot afford reputational losses. Moscow will try to be portrayed as a supporter of war by hijacking its peacekeeping agenda. Say, look, Ukraine and the US have agreed, but Russia doesn't want to. Therefore, in order to comply with diplomatic politeness, to support the image of a peacemaker and so on, it will have to participate in the negotiations,’ the expert told aif.ru.
‘Especially the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio openly admitted that the Ukrainian conflict is a proxy war between the US and Russia. Without negotiations, it is impossible to change relations between our countries.
Negotiations are definitely needed, whether Ukraine will be there or it will be used only as an excuse, it is important to move the position from the dead point, and not to stand on the position of confrontation,’ the political analyst summarised.
Ё-МАЁ
Registered Member
What the head of the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces said:
- 86% (1.1 thousand square kilometres) of the occupied territories of the Kursk region have already been liberated. The ‘North’ group has liberated 24 settlements only for the last five days. In some directions, the Russian army has crossed the state border and entered Sumy region;
The losses of the AFU in the Kursk border area exceeded 67,000 people, 400 people were taken prisoner. The AFU Kursk bridgehead accounted for about 19 per cent of personnel losses and 40 per cent of equipment losses.
- 86% (1.1 thousand square kilometres) of the occupied territories of the Kursk region have already been liberated. The ‘North’ group has liberated 24 settlements only for the last five days. In some directions, the Russian army has crossed the state border and entered Sumy region;
The losses of the AFU in the Kursk border area exceeded 67,000 people, 400 people were taken prisoner. The AFU Kursk bridgehead accounted for about 19 per cent of personnel losses and 40 per cent of equipment losses.
KingQamaR
Elite Member
Ukraine agrees to a ceasefire to safely withdraw troops from Kursk, redeploy them to Polrovsk and get new armament's from the US. Main stream Manipulators will have usual headlines when Russia refuses to agree.
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
-
-
Bangladesh PM’s adviser returns from Delhi airport; says he was ‘humiliated’ by immigration (2 Viewers)- Latest: El Sidd
-
