Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Finally someone guided by Asha, who seeks truth and eschews comfort of the Druj.

This tendency toward enkaar kardan in Iranians in general but especially the IR supporters on this forum is a form of Druj, it's an Ahrimanic deception which is molding Iranians into the sitting duck you speak of. Instead of militating against this corrupt government who now is opening the people to genocide and starvation, the Druj has hidden Iranians in incredibly stupid wishful thinking.

Some Iranians here like you and Emirzad (and Persian Gulf) understand how dire the situation is and are approaching the matter with fearless truth. If Iran survives, may people like you rise to lead our great nation.
It's just sad that it has come to this (while it could've been predicted and avoided) and soon the people of Iran will pay the price dearly.
 
Scott Ritter is an ill pedophile that "predicted" tons of those "probable scenarios" since 2015

He is mentally ill and his crazy predictions are ridiculous, it ranges from "US will use a neutron bomb on Iran" to "Israel will plant a portable nuke in Tehran" or that US will use a "secret weapon" on Iran that would magically delete everything without Iran even noticing

None of those predictions were right, this guy was also saying back in 2022 that the Russian buildup near Ukraine was a "fake created by the CIA" and that Russia would never invade Ukraine

Ask others here https://defencepk.com/forums/thread...es-to-bring-in-a-regime-change-in-iran.20810/ everyone is making fun of him

Also i don't care if he is supporting Iran/Russia/China, he is a mentally ill pedophile, supporting Iran will not change this, he is making money off "supporting" Iran and Russia, he realized after being exposed as a pedophile that his career was over, so he moved into pro-Russia/Iran TVs and youtube to make money from this
But his analysis was widely cited by your friends during True Promise 1 and True Promise 2. So, he's good if he says something that we like, but he is an ill pedophile when he says something you don't like. Same goes for that lunatic Omid Dana. He was hailed as "Sardar Rasaneh" when that idiot talked about delusional stuff like secret weapons and the alleged military might of the IRGC.
 
It's just sad that it has come to this (while it could've been predicted and avoided) and soon the people of Iran will pay the price dearly.
Dorood to a fellow brother in truth. I can tell you are a real Iran-doost.

All I can do is hope and pray that it will be quick, and that what remains of Iran can still be viable, even if it is just "Persia".
 
What do you guys make of Ritter's new argument?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It's everything I've been saying, about a complete and total bombing attack with nukes, aiming at command and control, bunkers, necessities of life, transit hubs, civilian centers, military, and nuclear facilities, combined with CIA/Mossad activated separatism. The only logical goal here for America and Israel is to destroy Iran as a nation (break it up) and genocide Iranians to the tune of several million, including with strategic nukes.

He also said the same thing as me about this attack being so violent and gruesome that it will leave Iran with no ability to strike back- all its missiles will be gone, its leadership will be gone, and the remnants of Iran's military will be disbanding or getting slaughtered by separatists, unable to unify the country.

Iran had 40 years to prepare, but America and Israel did, too.


It's possible.
They have that capability.
Israel is content at the moment...ask yourselves why....

All they'll do is say we had to preemptively nuke Iran because they were going to do that to us. Other than expressing outrage, the rest of the world won't be able to do anything.
 
It's possible.
They have that capability.
Israel is content at the moment...ask yourselves why....

All they'll do is say we had to preemptively nuke Iran because they were going to do that to us. Other than expressing outrage, the rest of the world won't be able to do anything.
They have been brainwashing Americans and Europeans (and even Muslims and Asians) against Iran for so long that there won't be an outrage either.
 
What if Iran fooled the world and really has nukes?

I love to see the faces of Donald and Bibi when Iran launches her first nuclear test in the Indian Ocean.
 
What if Iran fooled the world and really has nukes?

I love to see the faces of Donald and Bibi when Iran launches her first nuclear test in the Indian Ocean.
If Iran had nukes buddy, we wouldn't be here. It makes no sense for Iran not to announce them.

Once a country has nukes, diplomacy will have an air of respect about it. US diplomacy with Iran has been nothing but scorn, disrespect, indignity. You treat people like this if you can get away with it, if they cannot threaten you in a real way.

If the US knew Iran had nukes and Iran didn't announce, you'd still see a more equal footing approach. Look at DPRK. They just secured their survival for another century.
 
What if Iran fooled the world and really has nukes?

I love to see the faces of Donald and Bibi when Iran launches her first nuclear test in the Indian Ocean.
Having nukes is not a binary situation. It's not about possessing nukes or not. This is no longer early 1950s where only the Soviets and the Americans had access to nuclear knowledge.

Meanwhile, the main purpose of nuclear weapons for countries like Iran, or really any country other than the US, Russia or China, is to guarantee their security and be left alone. Look at the cases of India, North Korea and Pakistan. Iran is currently fighting for her survival under constant humiliation and harassment by the West and it's been an ongoing situation since 2003. That's not how a nuclear capable country is treated for over 2 decades.
 
Having nukes is not a binary situation. It's not about possessing nukes or not. This is no longer early 1950s where only the Soviets and the Americans had access to nuclear knowledge.

Meanwhile, the main purpose of nuclear weapons for countries like Iran, or really any country other than the US, Russia or China, is to guarantee their security and be left alone. Look at the cases of India, North Korea and Pakistan. Iran is currently fighting for her survival under constant humiliation and harassment by the West and it's been an ongoing situation since 2003.
I agree and thats why i hope that Iran is fooling everyone and really invented the bomb.

On the contrary, a nuclear Iran brings peace and stability to the region.

A nuclear Iran will keep Turkey, Egypt and all the other muslim nations in the Middle East safe.

Iran has no ambition to attack other muslim nations.
 
I agree and thats why i hope that Iran is fooling everyone and really invented the bomb.

On the contrary, a nuclear Iran brings peace and stability to the region.

A nuclear Iran will keep Turkey, Egypt and all the other muslim nations in the Middle East safe.

Iran has no ambition to attack other muslim nations.
I used to be against a nuclear Middle East, but with the ongoing genocide that the Israelites have launched against Palestinians with the full support of the West, maybe the only way that the Middle East can gain independence is for all regional powers to go nuclear. The nuclear trio of Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia can liberate the region from Western influence.
 
What do you guys make of Ritter's new argument?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It's everything I've been saying, about a complete and total bombing attack with nukes, aiming at command and control, bunkers, necessities of life, transit hubs, civilian centers, military, and nuclear facilities, combined with CIA/Mossad activated separatism. The only logical goal here for America and Israel is to destroy Iran as a nation (break it up) and genocide Iranians to the tune of several million, including with strategic nukes.

He also said the same thing as me about this attack being so violent and gruesome that it will leave Iran with no ability to strike back- all its missiles will be gone, its leadership will be gone, and the remnants of Iran's military will be disbanding or getting slaughtered by separatists, unable to unify the country.

Iran had 40 years to prepare, but America and Israel did, too.

Scott Ritter is a U.S. Army military officer, and you’d have to be very naive to believe he’s truly "switched sides." He’s just another manufactured asset tied to intelligence agencies and political agendas—a professional killer who has murdered many Muslim civilians.

He’s closely linked to the Republican Party, so when a Democrat is president, he suddenly plays the "pro-Russia," "anti-U.S." role, claiming the U.S. military is weak and can’t handle Russia in Ukraine. But when a Republican takes office, he flips the script, saying the U.S. could easily destroy Iran if it wanted to. How? Just months earlier, he was saying America had no strength left!

He’s a professional disinformation agent. In his video on Iran, he even parrots the line that "Iran must comply with international law"—pure pre-packaged Zionist rhetoric. Stay sharp and don’t fall for this kind of manipulation.

NOTE: They are perfecting the narrative and oppression—that’s all.
More and more pro-Palestinian voices are being persecuted in the West, while they keep ‘correcting’ the flaws in their war propaganda.

Now we see fake news like:
  • ‘Iran abandoned the Houthis’
  • ‘Israel isn’t attacking Syria—just bombing empty land’
  • ‘No Syrian Turks were killed’
  • Syria is pacified
  • ‘Hezbollah no longer exists and is (now)irrelevant’
  • ‘The U.S. will easily destroy Iran—easy peasy’
Someone have to be very "dumbass" to believe this: if destroying Iran were easy it would have been done decades ago when Iran had 10% of the military capabilities it has today.It’s all disinformation. Stay vigilant.
 
If it weren't for Khamenei's role in the presidency of Pezeshkian, I would've said that Zarif deserves nothing but a stool and a noose around his neck for treason. But then again, it is now clear that it was Khamenei who let Zarif sign the JCPOA
 
If it weren't for Khamenei's role in the presidency of Pezeshkian, I would've said that Zarif deserves nothing but a stool and a noose around his neck for treason. But then again, it is now clear that it was Khamenei who let Zarif sign the JCPOA
Whatever
Since 46 year ago when ever Iran wanted result sent Mr. Zarif .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top