Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

So because Pezeshkian and Zarif said it that means Iran as a nation is against fighting Israel? Pezeshkian is barely hanging on as president and would probably have never been president if Raisi didnt die.

Also, lemme teach you something- Iran isn't afraid of fighting Israel, its US's military involvement in support of Israel it is worried about.

You do some better research next time and not generalize a nation of 80M people by the comments of 2 people.
And why you don't say that about Arabs.. what is hypocrisy.... you always criticized Arabs for not fighting Israel now for Gaza.. and you seem to know the cause but just for Iran!? strange!
 

HTS government in Syria informed the palestinian representatives that there will no longer be any weapons, training camps, or military HQs for the Palestinian factions, and that the factions must dissolve their military formations as soon as possible​




Lebanon and the Syrian Event: Questions about Resistance, Economy, Society and Freedoms
Let's start from the professional side. Today, Syria is supposed to have opened up to a new media scene. Of course, it will take time before the censorship laws fall. This is unless the new government imposes new rules, similar to what the previous government did, such as allowing its supporters to work and preventing discussion of its opponents, whether Syrian or non-Syrian. However, with all the restrictions that appear in the form of fears among Syrians to talk about what is happening, the Syrian event was and will remain a Lebanese event par excellence.
Let's leave the victory celebrations that the "lazy fools" are good at, who were waiting for Israel to finish off Hezbollah and hand them the country, and waited for others to carry out a coup in Syria, assuming that they have their place at the heart of the Syrian scene, knowing that the most they can get is what the international powers that seek to control Syria decide, without ignoring the fact that the Lebanese majority is acting on the basis of the major change that has occurred, and it is a majority that includes political, sectarian and utilitarian diversity as well. However, there are also those among the Lebanese who are afraid that Syria will descend into uncreative chaos.
Let us start with those in power in Lebanon. The parliament has not said a word about what happened. The caretaker government is also keeping silent. Only the security and military forces are searching for a partner that they have not yet found on the other side of the border. So far, no Lebanese security or military apparatus has a sufficient picture of what is happening. The border crossings are empty of Syrian elements, and the Lebanese General Security can no longer find an exit stamp on the papers of any Syrian coming to Lebanon, and no one can record official numbers about those arriving or departing, because the Lebanese-Syrian border on the eastern side is loose. If these were the concerns of the first days, then the Syrian “day after” is in fact the Lebanese “day after.” Therefore, things should be monitored according to real priorities:
First: What happened in Syria represented a central challenge to the resistance and Hezbollah, since the new government in Syria is hostile to the party in all its aspects, and it includes armed groups that want to take revenge on the party for standing with the former regime in the Syrian civil war. But the most dangerous thing is that there is a strong current within the new government that does not seem to be concerned at all with the idea of resistance, and this is what has begun to emerge from those returning to Damascus who are talking today about “neutrality” regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict file, and they believe that the priority now is to rebuild Syria, and that war with Israel is not possible.
The new government is moving towards “neutrality” in the conflict with Israel, and the first decisions are to prevent Palestinian military action in all of Syria, in addition to closing any headquarters or passage that serves the resistance.
These people do not even take the initiative to issue a position on the open Israeli aggression against their country. Meanwhile, the new “liberals” of Syria herald a phase of “cold normalization.” Although they do not talk about establishing relations with Israel, they talk about practical steps by the new government that prevent any existing or potential resistance against Israel from Syrian territory. first indication of this direction is represented in the decision that Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham informed the representatives of the Palestinian factions present in Syria, that there will no longer be any weapons, training camps, or military headquarters for the Palestinian factions, and that the factions must dissolve their military formations as soon as possible, in exchange for political and charitable work under the roof of the new Syrian state. The practical result of this step is that the Palestinians are prohibited from using Syria as a headquarters or passage for any activity against the Israeli enemy. This is a step that will soon have its continuation in Lebanon, where the project to end the Palestinian camps will be taken out of the drawers, in preparation not for dissolving the military forces, but for settling them in Lebanon.
Second: A very large number of Syrians live in Lebanon, some of whom are elites who fled during the coups. Under Baath rule, the number of Syrians in Lebanon doubled until it stabilized during the period 1990-2011 at nearly half a million Syrians, most of whom were workers. After the outbreak of the civil war in Syria, these workers brought their families, before the number doubled to more than one and a half million Syrians, living in homes, farms and houses all over Lebanon. Among them were hundreds of thousands who were forced to live in camps that provided the minimum conditions of shelter. With the establishment of a system of interests between Lebanese, Syrian, Arab and international institutions in the name of helping the displaced, Lebanon was entering into a major division over how to deal with the displaced. After the fighting in Syria subsided and it became possible to talk about safe areas in Syria, the debate over the displaced intensified, but Lebanon was unable to deal with the Arab and international political decision to use the file of the displaced, knowing that the former regime did not show enthusiasm for returning them, as there was no place available for residence and no open markets for work.
After the fall of Assad’s rule, political and security considerations fell, and the forces that seized power rushed to call on Syrians abroad to return to their country. In Lebanon, some expected to see tens of thousands of Syrians crawling towards their country, disregarding security or border measures. But the opposite happened, as a large portion of those who left for Syria as a result of the Israeli aggression on Lebanon returned after the ceasefire. What is striking is that the semi-official figures available today, less than a week after Assad’s fall, indicate that the number of Syrians who entered Lebanon is more than double the number of Syrians who left. Just as former refugees spoke of leaving Syria for fear of being persecuted by the former regime, those arriving now are repeating the same argument. However, the difference is centered around the sectarian or political identity of the refugees. There is no indication on the horizon of a comprehensive solution, neither for former refugees nor for current refugees.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Any proof outside of a random tweet, i have seen several tweets where they have taken a random person's picture then attached a story to it. Then we later find out the person in the picture is actually someone else, and they are still alive and have nothing to do with the story.
 
Since when?
You tell me when bro.
you forgot the Arab Israel wars
when was that? 60s? you were probably not even born then and that is history now thats anot that relevant. The Arabs signed "peace" agreements and prepared their armies only to fight Shiites and Iran.
, Fatah, the FPLP, Hamas
i excluded Palestinians from my list. Dont mention Fatah- Abbas and Fatah are modern day traitors and fall into the Arabs that dont fight Israel.

If Fatah didnt fight Israel after it genocided Gaza, when will it fight Israel? never!
and many others?

Hezbollah is a relatively new happening to defend their own land Lebanon mostly in the south of Lebanon..
Hezbollah was formed in 1982...actually right after Arabs stopped fighting Israel and accepted Zionism and American consumerism (as a way of life) and supremacy. 1982 is not "new".
Keep your sectarianism to yourself..
Sorry you take me speaking the truth sensitively- i was just trying to call the facts out for what they are.

Your country still hasn't done crap to Israel after seeing it genocide Gaza- what i said is still true, dont get mad at me, reflect on what valueless people your country is now full of. enjoy your iphone lives!
 
You tell me when bro.

when was that? 60s? you were probably not even born then and that is history now thats anot that relevant. The Arabs signed "peace" agreements and prepared their armies only to fight Shiites and Iran.

i excluded Palestinians from my list. Dont mention Fatah- Abbas and Fatah are modern day traitors and fall into the Arabs that dont fight Israel.

If Fatah didnt fight Israel after it genocided Gaza, when will it fight Israel? never!



Hezbollah was formed in 1982...actually right after Arabs stopped fighting Israel and accepted Zionism and American consumerism (as a way of life) and supremacy. 1982 is not "new".

Sorry you take me speaking the truth sensitively- i was just trying to call the facts out for what they are.

Your country still hasn't done crap to Israel after seeing it genocide Gaza- what i said is still true, dont get mad at me, reflect on what valueless people your country is now full of. enjoy your iphone lives!
Your country is supporting the Genocide and you're doing nothing about it!

Just rants against the Arabs who fought 4 wars with Israel!
 
Your country is supporting the Genocide and you're doing nothing about it!
my govt is yes, and i hate that and know its wrong, but i am doing what i can in my power to not help Israel with its genocide, like by doing economic boycotts and voting in better politicians that terrorist agent orange- but btw, why are yo making this personal/about me when i was talking about your useless and spineless govt?
Just rants against the Arabs who fought 4 wars with Israel!
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Turkish Foreign Minister: We have no intention of entering into any armed conflict in Syria with any country, including Israel.

Israel is a bogeyman even for the Turks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top