Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

[Rollno21]

We will see. We have heard many promises from your kind.

Ok,you will inshallah

 

[r3alist]

Ok you win.

Did I say something wrong or frivolous?

Some actions have no room for alternative or double meaning, why is that an issue for your side as the instigator.

 

[Dalit]

Ok,you will inshallah

Don't waste our time. We are waiting.

 

[Rollno21]

Did I say something wrong or frivolous?

Some actions have no room for alternative or double meaning, why is that an issue for your side as the instigator.

No, there is nothing wrong, I don't have the appetite to go in circles.

Next time something terrible happens in Pakistan and innocent die, you can tell me if you are terrified of your shadow..

 

[Dalit]

No, there is nothing wrong, I don't have the appetite to go in circles.

Next time something terrible happens in Pakistan and innocent die, you can tell me if you are terrified of your shadow..

You have already killed enough innocent Pakistanis.

 

[Master Chief]

I believe you are a reasonable person. So I will try one last time. Currently set up is not fair for us. Pakistan with less people and land gets 80% share which is more than what you require as don't utilize and dump water into the sea.
Don't believe me but believe your people.
Irshad Khan told the committee that one million acre feet (MAF) water on average irrigated four million acres of land and the economic value of 1MAF water was estimated at $1bn. He said that about 29MAF water on average was going downstream Kotri — the last structure on the Indus system for water regulation — and falling into the Arabian Sea every year.

You seem to be attempting an intelligent debate regarding the details of the now defunct treaty. There is no problem with holding a debate, however the situation has gone well beyond that, and that is a decision entirely of India's own doing, at the state level. Notwithstanding inaccuracies and lack of objectivity in the data being presented, abrogating treaties unilaterally in this way is a clear attempt to cause direct harm to another party.

In short, like multiple times throughout history, The Secular Republic of India has not been acting or negotiating in good faith during peacetime.

 

[Rollno21]

You have already killed enough innocent Pakistanis.

Ok if you say so.

 

[Ak01]

Means - killed someone and asked to victim provide the evidence that I killed you!!!!!

Yaar if so sure Pakistan ministers should go all out at international platforms and provide solid evidence that it was false flag operation!

Otherwise - there is a gurranty as previously no one believes about your claims regarding false flag operations, this also will no one believe.

I suggest Pakistan - pls go out with evidence this time atleast else don't make fun of yourself because claiming such big - you need solid evidence

Let’s put all that aside.

Other than barking, what are you gonna do about it?

When are you attacking? We’re all thirsty for your blood…

 

[RAJPUT]

No, there is nothing wrong, I don't have the appetite to go in circles.

Next time something terrible happens in Pakistan and innocent die, you can tell me if you are terrified of your shadow..

Your well known teachers were laughing at our dead soldiers just a month ago. That Khan sir of yours jiski aankhon se lightning niklti hai memes main. He was literally laughing and making fun of the train hijacking. Your literate people are worse than demons so let alone the unparh jahil ones.

 

[Rollno21]

You seem to be attempting an intelligent debate regarding the details of the now defunct treaty. There is no problem with holding a debate, however the situation has gone well beyond that, and that is a decision entirely of India's own doing, at the state level. Notwithstanding inaccuracies and lack of objectivity in the data being presented, abrogating treaties unilaterally in this way is a clear attempt to cause direct harm to another party.

In short, like multiple times throughout history, The Secular Republic of India has not been acting or negotiating in good faith during peacetime.

Please check your facts, India has been requesting for renegotiation on iwt over a year with no response from Pakistan, if you search this very form you will find threads on it.

 

[r3alist]

No, there is nothing wrong, I don't have the appetite to go in circles.

Next time something terrible happens in Pakistan and innocent die, you can tell me if you are terrified of your shadow..

Terrified of your shadow comment was not intended in bad taste or anything like that

the ending of ivt as response to the terror attack is clearly a punishment or retributive measure, aimed to put Pakistan into existential angst and a unilateral power move


Why now would you suggest that it's infact just a redefining of an unfair old treaty, unrelated to the terror attack response


It therefore sounds like you are having second thoughts on how you want it perceived , but why?

 

[Rollno21]

Your well known teachers were laughing at our dead soldiers just a month ago. That Khan sir of yours jiski aankhon se lightning niklti hai memes main. He was literally laughing and making fun of the train hijacking. Your literate people are worse than demons so let alone the unparh jahil ones.

He was not laughing at the dead, he was laughing at the current situation. He is a bihari their slang is like that.

 

[suriya]

RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat: This isn’t a battle between religions, but Dharma vs Adharma

"The fight that is going on right now is not between sects and religions. Its basis is sect and religion, but this fight is between 'Dharma' and 'Adharma'. Our soldiers or our people have never killed anyone by asking about their religion. The fanatics who killed people by asking about their religion, Hindus would never do this. That is why the country should be strong. Everyone is sad, there is anger in our hearts as it should be, because to destroy the demons, immense power is necessary. But some people are not ready to understand this, and there cannot be
any kind of change in them now. Ravana was a devotee of Lord Shiva, knew the Vedas, had everything that was needed to be a good person, but the mind and intellect he had adopted were not ready to change. Ravana would not have changed until he died and was reborn. That is why Ram killed Ravana to change him. Evil people should be eliminated; this is the expectation. This expectation will be fulfilled..."

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Master Chief]

Please check your facts, India has been requesting for renegotiation on iwt over a year with no response from Pakistan, if you search this very form you will find threads on it.

You seem to be under the impression that India was in a position of "good faith standing" at ANY point during Modi's tenure.

Even Vajpayee openly accepted, in front of his own nation's baying hordes of bloodthirsty saffronists, that compromising with Pakistan on matters of state was acceptable.

When have Modi, Amit and their cabal ever taken a single step that might build mutual confidence between our nations? Will you not recognise that these thugs are actually harmful to your own narrative of being a "peaceful" and "prosperous" nation?

Modi has annexed disputed territory, destroyed historical sites, encouraged further attempts in the same regard, interfered in business/arts/sports to openly call for Pakistani "isolation", committed confirmed acts of state terrorism on foreign shores, to include Pakistan, USA, Canada, and has openly declared intent to invade and capture sovereign Pakistani territory and interests.

Like I said before, good faith negotiation during peacetime is welcomed by all Pakistanis, whether we are IK fanboys, military enthusiasts or patwaris. The problem is that our nation has always offered a hand of friendship, only to have it chewed off. When your administration decides to put your baying mobs in their place and openly accept the existence of Pakistan (instead of labelling it a perpetual Nehruvian travesty), then we can negotiate all things in good faith, without prejudice.

 

[Rollno21]

Terrified of your shadow comment was not intended in bad taste or anything like that

the ending of ivt as response to the terror attack is clearly a punishment or retributive measure, aimed to put Pakistan into existential angst and a unilateral power move


Why now would you suggest that it's infact just a redefining of an unfair old treaty, unrelated to the terror attack response


It therefore sounds like you are having second thoughts on how you want it perceived , but why?

Terror attack did spread up things. But you cannot blame us for not trying to negotiate.

Do you really think we are worried about how it will be perceived at this point of time.