Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some lowlife indians trying to satisfy their dwindling egos
I've said this before and I'll say it again, India would need to build dozens upon dozens of medium and large dams to even slightly decrease the water flow by only a few percentage points. That would require half a trillion dollars in construction alone. Timeline wise, it would take them the better part of 50 years to build even a portion of them.If India doesnt back track then Pakistan will get in to war mode. Dam can take 10 years to build and thats enough time to prepare for last battle. India will be responsible for nuclear fallout.
Pakistan will make that clear to international community. Just like now, then too India will bow down in front of USA pressure.
I believe a huge portion goes into simply paying salaries to maintain their large numbers, another huge chunk goes towards maintenance, and the rest goes towards procurement and r&d.$90b budget isn't enough? You cannot buy balls even with $1 trillion budget.
People should not make fun of Trump's statement in the slightest.Yes I agree with Trump, Mohammad Bin Qasim was the founder of Pakistan.
Even the construction of a single dam over the next eight years would reduce water inflow into Pakistan, a country already facing severe water scarcity. Pakistan is unlikely to wait for India to build fifty dams over the course of fifty years before taking action. Within the next 10 to 15 years, India could potentially withhold a significant volume of water, pushing Pakistan closer to a dire crisis of water shortage and survival.I've said this before and I'll say it again, India would need to build dozens upon dozens of medium and large dams to even slightly decrease the water flow by only a few percentage points. That would require half a trillion dollars in construction alone. Timeline wise, it would take them the better part of 50 years to build even a portion of them.
Its simply unrealistic. The Indians simply do not have the resources, and no one will help them do it either.
I believe a huge portion goes into simply paying salaries to maintain their large numbers, another huge chunk goes towards maintenance, and the rest goes towards procurement and r&d.
With over 1 million soldiers, $90 billion is nowhere near enough.
I've said this before and I'll say it again, India would need to build dozens upon dozens of medium and large dams to even slightly decrease the water flow by only a few percentage points. That would require half a trillion dollars in construction alone. Timeline wise, it would take them the better part of 50 years to build even a portion of them.
Its simply unrealistic. The Indians simply do not have the resources, and no one will help them do it either.
The m/c type gun on the top of the turret is quite interesting. Can it fire ASELSAN ATOM (programmable air-burst ammo) type rounds to take down loitering munitions? If so, it'll be the force multiplier.....
View attachment 116022
I've blocked this X/twitter account, so much trash on X!I am sorry but that was from the Turkish Naval parade
There's no evidence of this.Even the construction of a single dam over the next eight years would reduce water inflow into Pakistan, a country already facing severe water scarcity. Pakistan is unlikely to wait for India to build fifty dams over the course of fifty years before taking action. Within the next 10 to 15 years, India could potentially withhold a significant volume of water, pushing Pakistan closer to a dire crisis of water shortage and survival.
India has already built a few dams, and the immediate answer wasn't war.Right but Pakistan stance is clear, violation of IWT mean war. So for that even 1 dam is enough to cross red line.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.