Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian and Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir discussed plans for collaborative efforts, better coordination and intelligence sharing in the fight against terrorism as a common threat to the two neighbors.​


 

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian and Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir discussed plans for collaborative efforts, better coordination and intelligence sharing in the fight against terrorism as a common threat to the two neighbors.​


That spat over a week ago between Iran and Pakistan just seems so surreal when you see them all sitting around talking like nothing happened!

For sure they need to agree a plan to deal with the border situation, helping each other deal with terrorists/separatists, foreign agencies is win-win.
 
That spat over a week ago between Iran and Pakistan just seems so surreal when you see them all sitting around talking like nothing happened!

For sure they need to agree a plan to deal with the border situation, helping each other deal with terrorists/separatists, foreign agencies is win-win.

All is fine in the best of the worlds
 
That spat over a week ago between Iran and Pakistan just seems so surreal when you see them all sitting around talking like nothing happened!

For sure they need to agree a plan to deal with the border situation, helping each other deal with terrorists/separatists, foreign agencies is win-win.

Yeah it was a nothing burger event. But as usual Pakistan keyboard warriors (and some on Iranian side as well) tried to create it into some big event that the world would care about.

Like I said then, everyone will forget it a week later. And that’s what happened.

Nobody cares that both countries attacked random poor village huts in middle of nowhere.
 
Not a member of the 'mullah/Iran' hating group on this forum, but I feel that the attack was a major mistake by the Iranians.

At this critical time Iran doesn't need more enemies. By talking to the Iranians and moving on, Pakistan has shown itself to be the adult in the room.
 
Not a member of the 'mullah/Iran' hating group on this forum, but I feel that the attack was a major mistake by the Iranians.

At this critical time Iran doesn't need more enemies. By talking to the Iranians and moving on, Pakistan has shown itself to be the adult in the room.

You're like two weeks too late with this comment, we've moved on from all this. Major de ja vu!
 
A little list of misleading words US CENTCOM/DoD uses frequently, serves also as a translation of their words

"Shia-backed militias" = Iran-backed, This phrase means literally nothing, Lloyd Austin still uses it countless of times, this is like saying "Christian backed militias" or "Judaism-backed militias"

"Iranian targets" = Targets affiliated to an ally of Iran, used very frequently to hide the fact that they kill Iraqis and Syrians and using this "Iranian target" misleading quote to justify their deaths

"Iran-affiliated targets" = same as above

"Iranian backed terrorist groups" = Hezbollah and Ansarallah, literally anyone could say that EU is a terrorist organization and define their allies as "EU backed terrorist group"

"Iranic terrorist group" = Same as "shia-backed militias" but even more absurd

"Shia-backed terrorists" = same but aimed at Hezbollah and AnsarAllah, even though they have no clue of Islam and the differences between Shia culture/group/country specific culture and ideology, you don't need to believe in Velayat to be a Shia muslim
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The tank seems to have been set on fire at the end
 
“"We've been trying to determine Iran's red line for many years," Abrams said. "And we haven't found it." - Retired US General Roger Abrams on threats of Iranian retaliation

It seems based on this quote, US [and Israel] will continue pushing the envelope with attacks on Iran’s assets via sabotage, airstrikes, assassinations, defections, etc. until Iran responds to establish a red line.

As of right now, other than overtly kinetic strike on Iranian soil (which nearly every country in world that has a proper military retaliates), the West doesn’t seem to know where Iran’s redlines are.

They will keep pushing the envelope vis a vi their favorite tool — Israel.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Another threatening before striking (pretty much like Israel does since 40 years)

"We're going to strike you be aware"
Normal US and Israel striking weak/poor countries: says nothing beforehand
US about Iran: "Be careful we'll strike you in exactly 3-6 hours"
 
Another CENTCOM gem: "We shot down three Iranian UAVs"
Distorting words and making confusion for its readers, making it like they shot down UAVs coming from Iran

Translation: We shot down 3 UAVs fired from Yemen

Their obsession with Iran has no limit, it could become sexual at any moment
1706790071133.png
 
“"We've been trying to determine Iran's red line for many years," Abrams said. "And we haven't found it." - Retired US General Roger Abrams on threats of Iranian retaliation

It seems based on this quote, US [and Israel] will continue pushing the envelope with attacks on Iran’s assets via sabotage, airstrikes, assassinations, defections, etc. until Iran responds to establish a red line.

As of right now, other than overtly kinetic strike on Iranian soil (which nearly every country in world that has a proper military retaliates), the West doesn’t seem to know where Iran’s redlines are.

They will keep pushing the envelope vis a vi their favorite tool — Israel.

To put that quote into context:

:QUOTE:

'A pretty big target list'​

Retired Gen. Roger Abrams, a former combatant commander and an ABC News contributor, said the delay suggests to him that the U.S. response will be forceful and consequential and more widespread than recent strikes in the region.

"The longer it takes indicates to me that this is not going to be a little pinprick. A pinprick they could have done within six to 10 hours depending on available strike capability," he said.

Instead, Abrams said there's a "pretty big target list," including command-and-control nodes, storage facilities, any transit route for weapons or even an Iranian intelligence ship on the Red Sea.

"If they've got a smoking gun on who actually flew this suicide drone into Tower 22, you can expect that that [command-and-control] network, the emitters where the nodes, where commands were coming from …those are all going to be fair game," he said.

For its part, Iran has warned that its own response will be "decisive and immediate."

"The U.S. should stop using the language of threats and pinning the blame on others and rather focus on a political solution. Iran's response to threats will be decisive and immediate." Iran's Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian said, according to the Islamic Republic News Agency.

Triggering a retaliatory response from Iran and spurring a broader conflict is of obvious concern for the U.S, but experts and government officials say America must act.

"We've been trying to determine Iran's red line for many years," Abrams said. "And we haven't found it."

:END QUOTE:

Source: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-...-backed-group-drone-strike/story?id=106834435
 
Another CENTCOM gem: "We shot down three Iranian UAVs"
Distorting words and making confusion for its readers, making it like they shot down UAVs coming from Iran

Translation: We shot down 3 UAVs fired from Yemen

Their obsession with Iran has no limit, it could become sexual at any moment
View attachment 15493

And how did those UAVs get to the point of launch?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top