Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Hussain said:
someone even posted a pic here, of a Herc, with a fire in the background, when Noor Khan was hit....
Click to expand...
People are desperate to see our high value kit getting damaged, it makes me sick to my stomach. And its not Just on PDF - a few discord communities, telegram, Shitter... All of them, and whilst some of them are concerned Pakistanis the majority of them are Vinod from UP attempting to be a Pakistani.

"Bahi sunna tha key Islamabad mey bomb fata hain?"

:ROFLMAO:
 
Be dazzled said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

It’s a fake post showing CNN as the source. CNN has not made no such assessment.

ISPR has claimed and declared a long list of engagement of GROUND TARGETS.
IAF did much better with details and pictures that look more credible.
However, there was no display of any evidence for the same by ISPR. I am talking about destruction of ground targets and airfields.

In these times, it takes few hours to get hold of satellite images for any area.
This may not be liked by fanboys, but I would wait for proof in the form of before and after pictures for these claims.
 
Last edited:
@RescueRanger @Oscar @Panzerkiel Do you guys have any idea why didn't we use our own cruise missiles, Babur and Ra'ad? They have longer range, more lethality, harder to intercept - than Fatah (I think).

Cruise missiles have been the choice for Entrée by Americans for instance and now banyas too.

So why didn't we use ours?
 
Vkdindian1 said:
It’s a fake post showing CNN as the source. CNN has not made no such assessment.

ISPR has claimed and declared a long list of engagement of ground targets.
IAF did much better with details and pictures that look more credible.
However, there was no display of any evidence for the same by ISPR. I am talking about destruction of ground targets and airfields.

In these times, it takes few hours to get hold of satellite images for any area.
This may not be liked by fanboys, but I would wait for proof in the form of before and after pictures for these claims.
Click to expand...
at times 'waves' and 'amplitude' are evidence! enough said
 
Vkdindian1 said:
It’s a fake post showing CNN as the source. CNN has not made no such assessment.

ISPR has claimed and declared a long list of engagement of ground targets.
IAF did much better with details and pictures that look more credible.
However, there was no display of any evidence for the same by ISPR. I am talking about destruction of ground targets and airfields.

In these times, it takes few hours to get hold of satellite images for any area.
This may not be liked by fanboys, but I would wait for proof in the form of before and after pictures for these claims.
Click to expand...
you must be sad and lonely, do hug a cactus....
 
The pic where pilots are signing, what is its significance? Were they on a extremely 'risky' mission?
[/QUOTE]
That Pic is a very old photo from the Squadron Room of #9 (Griffins).

It was merely taken from stock footage.

One of our Members asked about it in the PAF Patches Topic in the PAF Thread.

I was able to identify the classic Patch and there is a picture of the Patch too.

I would say that pic is nearly 13 Years old.

As for what they are signing...

Each Pilot has to Log In & Log Out. It is how they keep track of their Hours (in Total) and on which Equipment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top