Iranian Air Force (IRIAF/IRGC-ASF) | News and Discussions

Not comparable. Not even at same class as they have already claimed.

Point is, people like you kiss Americans' backside with a non existing thing but when we show something as a testbed, you jump to a world of conclusions.

Your retarded brain cannot comprehend yet, that Iran only produces something that gets the job done. Not everything. Not even other countries would mass produce every prototype.

@Deino the brown nose dinasaur


Post reported due to spreading lies and personnel insults!

If you would like to at least be so honest to check what I post instead of brainlessly basing me just since you don‘t like to accept reality, you would have noticed I NEVER EVER posted anything positive on the NGAD or US capabilities! Usually I‘m one of the most sceptical members and what I hate the most is spreading nationalistic BS and lies (like your posts), bragging and personnel insults!

Don‘t get me wrong, but to claim Iran could develop at least something comparable to a 4th generation fighter is ridicolous, it lacks anything needed for anything more advanced. As such simply shut up and come back to reality and in case you insult anyone, at least get your claims correct.
 
That is not true depiction.

It will look like this:

View attachment 122599

There might be further changes but relevant information is not public.


No NGAD prototype have that look.
The one he posted is at least from recent white House announcement with airforce chief and Donald present, the one you showed can be dated back to as early as 2010s or something, so, why are you assuming the later one is real and you are calling the white House illustration incorrect, I don't get it.
 
The one he posted is at least from recent white House announcement with airforce chief and Donald present, the one you showed can be dated back to as early as 2010s or something, so, why are you assuming the later one is real and you are calling the white House illustration incorrect, I don't get it.
 
Post reported due to spreading lies and personnel insults!

If you would like to at least be so honest to check what I post instead of brainlessly basing me just since you don‘t like to accept reality, you would have noticed I NEVER EVER posted anything positive on the NGAD or US capabilities! Usually I‘m one of the most sceptical members and what I hate the most is spreading nationalistic BS and lies (like your posts), bragging and personnel insults!

Don‘t get me wrong, but to claim Iran could develop at least something comparable to a 4th generation fighter is ridicolous, it lacks anything needed for anything more advanced. As such simply shut up and come back to reality and in case you insult anyone, at least get your claims correct.
You are completely off base and I took a screenshot of your comment. Iran has surpassed the 4th generation. You have not observed anything and I, as a former metallurgist, observe and detect things that you do not see. You and others here on this forum will lose face. Planes are ready to be revealed, the IRIAF has not heard from you to build planes. This is very factual.
 
with all due respect, the J-50 does not have a dropped wingtips but all moveable wingtip, it's totally different thing.
As far as I know the information I provided is correct. Please provide information to counter the information I've provided and to underpin your claim. Just saying that it doesn't doesn't really count for anything. I believe also it's drooped winglets and not dropped. I'm not an aviation expert but I am quite certain I haven't misunderstood the information concerning the J-50. I could be wrong, please feel free to correct me.
 
Yes for sure ... and these fighters - even if only 3.5 or even Generation 4.0 - are already that much stealthy, no-one can see them! :ROFLMAO:

Talk is cheep ... 🤡
Am I unable to add you to my ignore list because you're a mod? If so, stop posting like a child and be more professional if I'm going to be forced to read your posts. You're posts are low effort and non-contributional like a certain other person on this forum.
 
As far as I know the information I provided is correct. Please provide information to counter the information I've provided and to underpin your claim. Just saying that it doesn't doesn't really count for anything. I believe also it's drooped winglets and not dropped. I'm not an aviation expert but I am quite certain I haven't misunderstood the information concerning the J-50. I could be wrong, please feel free to correct me.
I'll share some videos when I comes home.
 
As far as I know the information I provided is correct. Please provide information to counter the information I've provided and to underpin your claim. Just saying that it doesn't doesn't really count for anything. I believe also it's drooped winglets and not dropped. I'm not an aviation expert but I am quite certain I haven't misunderstood the information concerning the J-50. I could be wrong, please feel free to correct me.
It's very clear in this video, the all movable wingtip compared with Iran's dropped wingtip.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

phpMBAhUm.jpg
 
It's very clear in this video, the all movable wingtip compared with Iran's dropped wingtip.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

View attachment 122770

Thank you for providing the videos. Wallahi I can't see the winglets being movable but I'll take your word for it. Though one must still accept that as a design concept the drooped winglets, movable or not, is viable aviation design despite the most of the so called expert opinions concerning the matter. As far as I know Iran was the first country in the world us the particular design beyond prototype.
 
Thank you for providing the videos. Wallahi I can't see the winglets being movable but I'll take your word for it. Though one must still accept that as a design concept the drooped winglets, movable or not, is viable aviation design despite the most of the so called expert opinions concerning the matter. As far as I know Iran was the first country in the world us the particular design beyond prototype.
Actually there are plenty videos.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
People, there are no miracles! You can roughly tell what technical level Iran is at, and you can tell from the rumors about the results it has achieved. I don't think a 5th generation aircraft can be built from that. I think Iran would be able to produce the Yak-130 aircraft with an afterburner engine and a modern AESA radar, with Russian or perhaps Chinese help.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
no more off topic posts

this thread isn't about US air force
 
Thank you for providing the videos. Wallahi I can't see the winglets being movable but I'll take your word for it. Though one must still accept that as a design concept the drooped winglets, movable or not, is viable aviation design despite the most of the so called expert opinions concerning the matter. As far as I know Iran was the first country in the world us the particular design beyond prototype.

On a scale RC model?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Piet
Back
Top