JH-7 as a Missile Hauler Repurposing MastanKhans idea

Essentially you want to consider a strike platform, which probably would be cool for DEAD/SEAD

The biggest hurdle to this is funds otherwise you could've sourced something from China
 
Yes, that is why KAAN and J-35A are being pursued for procurement.
So you want PAF to buy 3 twin engine fighter jets under current economic conditions, even though historically you've operated single engine when Pakistan was financially better off.
Is Mastan biradar financing all this.
 
Hitting hard once is better than hitting soft many times. A single missile can sink or cripple a carrier. In WW2 small American planes sunk all the big Japanese carriers.
Can't carry enough payloads to strike any significant targets in India and CM-400AKG is basically a anti ship missile and from India-Pakistan border it's unable to reach new Delhi ( range 240 km) whereas from border to New Delhi distance is more than 300 km
 
JH-7 A or B if can come which I don't see any chance of will come for bombing role. Although J-16 both fighter version and EW version are things which really make sense as deep strike plus taking EW role to whole new level. Even if not fighter jet version doesn't come still only if EW comes that will take the EW to whole new level.
J16 is not available for Pakistan because J16 's design is based on Su-30MKK/MKK2 which is RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
 
The Flounder by today’s standard is a very outdated design with primary shortcomings displayed in poor high AoA performance (that resulted in many incidents with fatalities) and poor engines with lackluster thrust (reverse engineered Rolls-Royce Spey) that pretty much ruled it out of being a multi-role platform. There has been proposals to fit it with a multi-purpose pulse doppler radar enabling the use of BVR missiles like PL-12, but eventually the PLAAF concluded that the platform is too limited for said refit to be worth their while. It really is fundamentally a cold war era fighter bomber, as in designed for ultra-low altitude penetration and the “fighter” bit of the “fighter-bomber” just means it can carry some infrared missiles to defend itself, somewhat.

While the Flounder still do show up as an export option under the moniker FBC-1, but in reality the model have already ceased production, and it is mainly kept in service just because it has enough ground clearance to comfortably carry large diameter AShMs like the YJ-12. If Pakistan wants to procure a heavy strike platform it will have to come up with something else.
 
Pakistan likely plans to use J-35E as its next strike platform leveraging stealth but it still presents limited payload.
 
J16 is not available for Pakistan because J16 's design is based on Su-30MKK/MKK2 which is RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Slight correction. J-16 is not directly related to Su-30MKK/MK2 in any way, and is originally sought by the PLAN as a long range patrol variant similar to Su-27PU, improving crew ergonomics in long loiter time missions by relegating the radar operation to a dedicated personnel, armed with an indigenous Chinese radar with improved downward filter capability to identify threats both surface and air.

Many consider the J-16 is PLAAF’s premier strike fighter, which I find amusing since that role is pretty much thrusted upon it as the rapid geopolitical shift forced the PLAAF to shift to an offensive posture.
 
JH-7 as a Missile Hauler: Bridging the BVR Gap in South Asian Skies

The concept of using the Chinese-origin JH-7 fighter-bomber as a long-range bomber was first introduced by forum member MastanKhan, who proposed its employment for standoff missile delivery in a networked air combat environment. This idea gains renewed relevance in the aftermath of the intense aerial activity observed during the May 2025 face-off between the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) and Indian Air Force (IAF), where over 100 fighters were reportedly airborne and an estimated 400 BVR missiles were in play.

While the IAF benefits from platforms like the Su-30MKI and Rafale—with the ability to carry up to 8–12 BVRs per aircraft—PAF’s lighter fleet, consisting primarily of F-16s, JF-17s, and even the advanced J-10CE, generally carries fewer missiles. This disparity in BVR saturation could prove critical in large-scale engagements, where volume of fire and missile persistence can tip the balance.

Repurposing the JH-7: A Logical Step Forward

The JH-7, known for its strike role, features twin engines, high fuel capacity, and a heavy weapons load. Though not designed for air superiority, its physical capacity to carry multiple heavy payloads makes it an excellent candidate for repurposing as a BVR missile truck. Stripped of air-to-ground ordnance and equipped with PL-15 LRAAMs, a JH-7 could potentially field 8–10 missiles per sortie—dramatically increasing PAF’s BVR count in the air.

Tactical Integration

This approach would not require JH-7s to enter contested airspace. They could remain in standoff zones, protected by fighters and supported by AWACS, and launch PL-15s based on cueing from forward-deployed JF-17 Block III or J-10CEs. With the PL-15’s estimated range of 200–300 km and active AESA seeker, this tactic significantly extends the engagement envelope.

Such missile carriers would serve as force multipliers, enabling PAF to saturate Indian airspace with long-range missiles, complicating IAF’s tactical calculations, and helping to neutralize their numerical advantage in missile loadouts.

LRAAM Guidance via AWACS and Networked Fighters

The key to making this approach viable is data-link integration. JH-7s would not operate independently but would act as rear-echelon missile launchers. Cueing and mid-course guidance would be provided by frontline fighters like the JF-17 Block III and J-10CE, both of which support advanced targeting through datalink systems. AWACS platforms such as the Saab Erieye and ZDK-03 would provide battlespace awareness and tracking, turning the JH-7 into a standoff shooter.

Strategic Impact

Integrating JH-7s in this role could be a game-changer. In high-tempo engagements, where the rate of missile expenditure is high, having additional platforms dedicated purely to missile carriage and launch relieves the burden on frontline fighters. It also helps saturate enemy defenses, complicates interception planning, and adds strategic depth to the air battle.

Furthermore, with PL-15s estimated to have ranges exceeding 200 km, such tactics enable PAF to hold enemy assets at risk from much greater distances—especially valuable in denying airspace or neutralizing high-value enemy enablers like AWACS and refueling aircraft.

Conclusion

What began as a forum concept by MastanKhan now appears as a tactically sound and operationally feasible idea. Employing JH-7s as missile haulers could significantly enhance PAF’s ability to contest the skies in high-intensity scenarios. It’s an adaptive solution to the growing challenge of BVR volume—a vital factor in the evolving calculus of South Asian air combat.

UFC
@MastanKhan
Oh please, not this again! :) The PAF is moving onto fifth gen now.
 
On the other hand, I would ask all of our knowledgeable members to view the issue from the Chinese perspective, what is in China’s geopolitical interest.

While it should be comfortably obvious that China have a vested interest in giving Pakistan sufficient capabilities in maintaining the status quo, achieving parity or even slight advantages in small to medium scale confrontations especially in the Kashmir region (If India occupies AJK, not only will China lose its land access to Pakistan, India would surely eye Chinese-controlled Aksai-chin next), is it really in China’s interest to give the PAF a long range heavy platform that’s able to rapidly and frequently conduct tactical strikes deep into Indian heartlands and unilaterally escalate the situation?
 
Slight correction. J-16 is not directly related to Su-30MKK/MK2 in any way, and is originally sought by the PLAN as a long range patrol variant similar to Su-27PU, improving crew ergonomics in long loiter time missions by relegating the radar operation to a dedicated personnel, armed with an indigenous Chinese radar with improved downward filter capability to identify threats both surface and air.

Many consider the J-16 is PLAAF’s premier strike fighter, which I find amusing since that role is pretty much thrusted upon it as the rapid geopolitical shift forced the PLAAF to shift to an offensive posture.
Still it's a Soviet/Russian design whether it's based on either MKK/MKK2 or Su-27PU, its doesn't matter much
 
On the other hand, I would ask all of our knowledgeable members to view the issue from the Chinese perspective, what is in China’s geopolitical interest.

While it should be comfortably obvious that China have a vested interest in giving Pakistan sufficient capabilities in maintaining the status quo, achieving parity or even slight advantages in small to medium scale confrontations especially in the Kashmir region (If India occupies AJK, not only will China lose its land access to Pakistan, India would surely eye Chinese-controlled Aksai-chin next), is it really in China’s interest to give the PAF a long range heavy platform that’s able to rapidly and frequently conduct tactical strikes deep into Indian heartlands and unilaterally escalate the situation?
J-16 has no chance for Pakistan but I think upcoming JH-XX regional bomber/fighter bomber has chance to be inducted by PAF if project development continues
 
J-16 has no chance for Pakistan but I think upcoming JH-XX regional bomber/fighter bomber has chance to be inducted by PAF if project development continues
If you are referring to the new three engine CAC aircraft, that is not the JH-XX. Anyone that still refers to that aircraft as either JH-XX or some sort of regional bomber is very misguided, as the project have both visible and documented doctrinal features that firmly suggests otherwise, but that's another story.

And no, as a broadband stealth aircraft capable of sustained supersonic cruise, able to penetrate all existing Indian air defence systems and aerial platforms will not be up for export for the foreseeable future. Again, the goal is to maintain parity between Pakistan and India. India gains advanced 4.5 gen fighter, Pakistan gets advanced 4.5 gen fighter. When India finally pulls its head out of its ass and shift from AMCA back to the FGFA, Pakistan will get FC-31.

As for when will the subcontinent moves into 6th gen, it's simply not in the foreseeable future.

Realistically if Pakistan is that desperate for a strike fighter, the best bet would be entering a joint development venture to scale up the Hondu JL-10 with an enlarged fuselage to house either the WS-13 or the WS-10, to be something like the superhornet.
 
A squadron of JH-7 if able to carry PL 17 can still be useful..... HOWEVER
In a long run

This should be next on menu after
J 35....
We definitely, definitely need a missile truck being able to carry
PL 15 220 km
PL 17 450 km
 
A squadron of JH-7 if able to carry PL 17 can still be useful..... HOWEVER
In a long run

This should be next on menu after
J 35....
We definitely, definitely need a missile truck being able to carry
PL 15 220 km
PL 17 450 km
Okay. I think this is stretching it a bit too far.

You definitely won't be getting any strategic stealth bombers like the H-20 or J-36. It's just common sense these are top of the line Chinese strategic assets not for export, extremely expensive and in fact don't even fit within the PAF's doctrine.
 
If you are referring to the new three engine CAC aircraft, that is not the JH-XX. Anyone that still refers to that aircraft as either JH-XX or some sort of regional bomber is very misguided, as the project have both visible and documented doctrinal features that firmly suggests otherwise, but that's another story.

And no, as a broadband stealth aircraft capable of sustained supersonic cruise, able to penetrate all existing Indian air defence systems and aerial platforms will not be up for export for the foreseeable future. Again, the goal is to maintain parity between Pakistan and India. India gains advanced 4.5 gen fighter, Pakistan gets advanced 4.5 gen fighter. When India finally pulls its head out of its ass and shift from AMCA back to the FGFA, Pakistan will get FC-31.

As for when will the subcontinent moves into 6th gen, it's simply not in the foreseeable future.

Realistically if Pakistan is that desperate for a strike fighter, the best bet would be entering a joint development venture to scale up the Hondu JL-10 with an enlarged fuselage to house either the WS-13 or the WS-10, to be something like the superhornet.
I don't think he was referring to the J-36, but the one which was rumoured to be a more tactical fighter-bomber.

Still, even this is unextremely unlikely given high costs, and likely Chinese unwillingness to sell for maintaining balanced parity rather than giving dominance to Pakistan like you said.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top