Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Olympus81]

Doesn't show any damage? are these just teasers?

Yes. The Bhakts have their work cut out.

 

[Gripen9]

Takla back at it again, pedaling the same bollywood msala of pAkiStaN fACeD hEAvy loSses. Like yeah dude PL15s arent cheap, but we gotta use the pesticides to kill some pests anyway so yeah it was heavy loss on our pocket while Indian air farce was eventually going to crash the jets anyway.

Bambuu fit kardiya hai pichware mein inke

 

[Gripen9]

I am sure you think spice bombs are akshay Kumar of bombs who sneak through the window of the building, kill 300 people on the spot and leave without a trace or a hint.
That madrassa is still there, the OGW who sent you the pictures before the attack did send you the pictures after that event but it was your inflated ego that couldn't accept that you failed to achieve your objective in any way possible.

The balakot strike was a cockup as well. It would seem the GPS coordinates fed into the spice bombs were incorrect? and the crew was in a hurry to jettison their stores.

The whole episode was debunked right away by an Australian team

India’s strike on Balakot: a very precise miss? | The Strategist

Ever since the stunning US success in the 1991 Gulf War, we have increasingly come to take precision bombing for granted. While militaries may sometimes misidentify a target, we assume that they can precisely hit ...

www.aspistrategist.org.au

 

[side-winder]

As a Think Tank, please use appropriate language and keep your Hayyyeeee etc to members who converse in that language. More so, considering that I have been more than respectful from my side.

You have your sources, I have mine.

On 10th, IAF was in full force and delivering its weapons at will. Each and every weapon launched against ground targets was Air Launched.
Your claim that none of the aircraft came within 200 kms of IB is also not factual. Please see the distance of Sargodha from IB and then work backwards to see what kind of ranges the weapons would have been launched by the IAF.

What is correct though, that IAF was on tenterhooks and ample precautions had to be taken after the surprise they got on 7th.

IAF had to rework the tactics due to PL-15s stellar performance. And that was successfully proven by the fact that IAF struck at targets all across with precision, unopposed.

Lol. Oky. There is no point left for the sake of argument. You are gonna believe what you gonna believe. Im very sure about my claims for a reason. Specially for the sargodha example that you highlighted. I even know where exactly the missiles on sargodha were launched from.

Anyway, you can just go back and pay heed on the words of your very CDS whose narrataive you are peddling here. The so-called change of tactics was basically launch missiles from "larger" distances. That's what basically he said. This only further proves my claim of IAF not being able to come close to border. Also take a pause and spend some time thinking as to why you couldn't engage even a single fighter of PAF even on 10th.

As for SSMs being used more often than ALCMs. Well, you ain't gonna believe so let it be.

Overall, the IAF did a very shit show with the sort of budget and resources they had. The people should be very angry about it. It demands serious accountability. On a serious note.

 

[Gripen9]

Silent chachu is disappointed...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Vox Non Dei]

1000s of videos flying overall in social media of Indian AFBs up in smoke yet the Indians are adamant to show the satellite pictures.

All of them are not showing any damage to the bases. Just some smoke cloud at random places or misrepresentation of place. Not a single one is genuine.

Besides, India achieved all its goal of destroying those seminaries.

 

[Gripen9]

Lol. Oky. There is no point left for the sake of argument. You are gonna believe what you gonna believe. Im very sure about my claims for a reason. Specially for the sargodha example that you highlighted. I even know where exactly the missiles on sargodha were launched from.

Anyway, you can just go back and pay heed on the words of your very CDS whose narrataive you are peddling here. The so-called change of tactics was basically launch missiles from "larger" distances. That's what basically he said. This only further proves my claim of IAF not being able to come close to border. As for SSMs being used more often than ALCMs. Well, you ain't gonna believe so let it be.

Land booster of Brahmos launched from rajasthan to target bholari

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Gripen9]

 

[Vkdindian1]

The so-called change of tactics was basically launch missiles from "larger" distances. That's what basically he said. This only further proves my claim of IAF not being able to come close to border. Also take a pause and spend some time thinking as to why you couldn't engage even a single fighter of PAF even on 10th.

As for SSMs being used more often than ALCMs. Well, you ain't gonna believe so let it be.

That could also mean adequate degradation of AD and the associated radars in pockets to deny visibility to the adversary and creating a decision dilemma. There could be few more ways to achieve what was required to be done.

I too think that it is time where it has come to your word against mine.

Unlike a fanboy, I would still congratulate PAF for achieving what they did.

 

[Deino]

Come on, we have visual images of another heavy air to air missile for over a year now..whatever you want to call it

No, we don‘t! We have seen the well-known PL-17 under a J-16 and PL-15 under a J-20 but not „another heavy air to air missile“ and even more so none related to Pakistan

 

[side-winder]

That could also mean adequate degradation of AD and the associated radars in pockets to deny visibility to the adversary and creating a decision dilemma. There could be few more ways to achieve what was required to be done.

The adverdary was tracking each of your missiles and knows exactly where those missiles were being launched from. Don't worry.

I guess, as an example, AVM Aurangzeb also showed with actual radar tracks. How couple of missiles launched on shahbaz and bholari were made ineffective.

 

[Vox Non Dei]

. I strongly believe Pakistan can take the Indian Occupied Kashmir back with perhaps the Hindu majority Jammu areas.

It took only 96 hours of sporadic medium intensity combat for Pakistan to start reaching out for its National Command Authority...

Rest you can figure out yourself. Noteworthy, Indian Navy and Indian Army had minimal involvement only with some artillery pieces and attacks limited to existing posts.

 

[Olympus81]

Besides, India achieved all its goal of destroying those seminaries.

A mosque and seminaries resulting in deaths of innocents.

 

[Vapnope]

The balakot strike was a cockup as well. It would seem the GPS coordinates fed into the spice bombs were incorrect? and the crew was in a hurry to jettison their stores.

The whole episode was debunked right away by an Australian team

India’s strike on Balakot: a very precise miss? | The Strategist

Ever since the stunning US success in the 1991 Gulf War, we have increasingly come to take precision bombing for granted. While militaries may sometimes misidentify a target, we assume that they can precisely hit ...

www.aspistrategist.org.au

Or maybe maybe our EW did the work. Just saying...

 

[PakShaheen_79]

How Pakistani narrative is suffering from missing satellite imagery despite confession of Indian CDS can be seen in this Indian propaganda video below. I am not supporting his entire analysis but part about Indian strikes on PAF installations leave one wondering if Pakistan actually hit anything in India. This also remind the Air Crd (R) Chishti who said that PAF during the 4-5 hours of 10th May 2025 delivered more ordinance on Indian targets than it did during the entire 1965 war which lasted for 17 days. One must ask, why don't we have any cockpit imagery, weapon video feed (like 2019), at all? What were the specific targets which were hit? This is turning embarrassing now in all fairness.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies