El Sidd
Elite Member
They why all the crying ?
They are not crying but laughing at Pakistani government's proposal for composite talks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They why all the crying ?
Why did Paksiatn accept ceasefire
by my reading, he argued, 6 (the figure) is not important...indian cds denied 6 destroyed aircraft, but then in the same sentence mentioned "it's not important how THEY were destroyed"![]()
They are not crying but laughing at Pakistani government's proposal for composite talks.
it will rise, just wait for few more days....!Indians on X trying the best they can to prove 08 PAF jets down....pilots names, service no ........same as we did two days ago......
Pakistan has consistently sought a peaceful resolution from the beginning of the terrorist incident. It is Modi who has been showcasing bravado to his people, claiming he would teach Pakistan a lesson. Therefore, the real question should be: if India truly had the upper hand, why did it agree to a ceasefire?This fact is hard to understand by anyone with fanboy mentality, who think of this conflict like a sports match and link all aspects of this to one.
First of all it was not a war. War is what is taking place between Russia and Ukraine right now where Russia has set sight over Ukraine territory and is hell bent to not stop till it achieves its aim.
This was started by India with clean strike over few terrorists camps to give a message to Paksiatn to stop any kind of support to secessionists in Kashmir. It said clearly that it is not against military. This message was for posturing that we don’t want military to military escalation if things stop right there.
It was expected that Paksiatn would give a reply which it did by shooing down Indian fighters and then launching attacks with drones. It was a message again to show that Paksiatn would retaliate at any cost.
India said - wait you want to attack our military bases, we will attack your’s too and we can hit anything we want. But the weight of attack was kept at minimum level. Not excessive damage just signalling. Intent still was not to start a full war.
Paksiatn retaliated with Fatah and CM400 strike with an attempt to do the same like Indian targeting.
Till this time, no side was keen for a full fledged war but mere posturing and signalling.
This is clear from the kind of and number of weapons used till ceasefire was declared.
So, there is no question of who won and who lost as both sides exposed chinks in the armour for the other side. Vulnerabilities were exposed on both the sides.
Corollary to that would be - Why did Paksiatn accept ceasefire if everything was going great for it? Or why didn’t it make some more gains if it was going so great? I am not claiming these, but just quoting for some perspective.
Any more time could have resulted in an escalation of unimaginable dimensions, which no one wanted and decided to accept the ceasefire without much hulla gulla.
Look at the British slave mindset, complaining about DG ISPR's english from the start to the end of the video, this is the mindset of Indian general, so petty!
DG ISPR: "PAF downed 6 indian jets", Indian response, "Your English grammar is bad".
Pakistan aircrafts crossed LOC. There were reports of that on 10th May.
PAF didnt brag later on because of descalation , ceasefire…. So called restraint…
Looks like crying to me and the rest of the planet…
Maybe you don’t have VPN so you don’t know what is going on in the world
You are underestimating the value of gold in the Somnath and other temples. Indians can buy the world's opinion.
Doesn’t seem to be working…
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.