Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Ok i asked my dad so this is what he told me

So basically in Bholari a Saab 2000 was damaged. he said the left wing was damaged due to the hanger falling on it thats the only meaningful damage in the strikes rest were safe alhamdulillah... If it went on a day later the AHQ was on lock literally and they dug trenches to hide in case of an attack

But dont get it twisted, he told me on 10th we actually damaged alot on their side too, he told me we hit like 15 targets successfully with fatah missile

On top of that we had 20-23 aircrafts of theirs on LOCK in 7th but showed restraint

Also no pilot crossed the LOC on anyday so that srinagar stuff is fake
 
NationalistPKDude132 said:
Ok i asked my dad so this is what he told me

So basically in Bholari a Saab 2000 was damaged. he said the left wing was damaged due to the hanger falling on it thats the only meaningful damage in the strikes rest were safe alhamdulillah... If it went on a day later the AHQ was on lock literally and they dug trenches to hide in case of an attack

But dont get it twisted, he told me on 10th we actually damaged alot on their side too, he told me we hit like 15 targets successfully with fatah missile

On top of that we had 20-23 aircrafts of theirs on LOCK in 7th but showed restraint

Also no pilot crossed the LOC on anyday so that srinagar stuff is fake
Click to expand...
was damage to the aircraft wing from debris falling from the roof ? Because if the whole hangar fell, its quite possible whole plane would be so damaged as to be written off.
 
Watandar said:
was damage to the aircraft wing from debris falling from the roof ? Because if the whole hangar fell, its quite possible whole plane would be so damaged as to be written off.
Click to expand...
I do not know honestly, DG ISPR did mention one aircraft was damaged and it was repairing and coming back to operation
 
What your father has told you is about Saab being damaged is common knowledge, if you really want information, ask him about the number of PL-15's that we actually fired and how many of them sent back "Positive Impact" signal.
 
F86 Saber said:
What your father has told you is about Saab being damaged is common knowledge, if you really want information, ask him about the number of PL-15's that we actually fired and how many of them sent back "Positive Impact" signal.
Click to expand...
Im not sure if he has this knowledge, after all he is only in Logistics Branch. I didnt know the Saab was common knowledge, is it true its only the left wing?
 
safriz said:
True. Army only carried out limited actions, only after Air chief showed courage, when his air based were hit.
Guess who got promoted?
Click to expand...
Airchief can't take any major decision without explicit permission from GHQ......get it your biased head .
 
NationalistPKDude132 said:
Im not sure if he has this knowledge, after all he is only in Logistics Branch. I didnt know the Saab was common knowledge, is it true its only the left wing?
Click to expand...

Damaged but repairable, we recovered a Saab 2000 from a much worse situation after the Kamra terrorist attack.
By the way, the data that DCAS Aurangzeb shared about the 5 hits, that came from the missile itself. PL-15 transmits back data of type of impact (successful hit or a near miss) time and coordinates of impact and even the assessment of target and even identity if the target i.e type of aircraft.
 
F86 Saber said:
Damaged but repairable, we recovered a Saab 2000 from a much worse situation after the Kamra terrorist attack.
By the way, the data that DCAS Aurangzeb shared about the 5 hits, that came from the missile itself. PL-15 transmits back data of type of impact (successful hit or a near miss) time and coordinates of impact and even the assessment of target and even identity if the target i.e type of aircraft.
Click to expand...
Do you have more info on what we managed to hit on May 10th Operation you seem like you have insider sources
 
F86 Saber said:
Damaged but repairable, we recovered a Saab 2000 from a much worse situation after the Kamra terrorist attack.
By the way, the data that DCAS Aurangzeb shared about the 5 hits, that came from the missile itself. PL-15 transmits back data of type of impact (successful hit or a near miss) time and coordinates of impact and even the assessment of target and even identity if the target i.e type of aircraft.
Click to expand...
May I know how you know this about the PL-15?
 
Vkdindian1 said:
@PakSword, I see that you have very selective requirements regarding debris of missiles.
When Fatah is in question you want each piece to be counted and shown to you with a proof that no damage was done to Indian targets.
But when it is convenient, the missiles are completely destroyed on impact or after hitting a target.
Decide kar lo ke chaahte kya ho.

P

Post in thread 'Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion'

Abdul q said:
Funny they couldn’t complain about PL-15 to china like they did about AIM-120 to muricans…. 😂😂😂
Click to expand...
Yeh itnay kuttay ki tarah dig kartay hain ke BC AIM-120 khod ke nikal lia tha.. aur poori duniya ko dikhaya tha.. And then they recently found one little missile somewhere and started dancing they had intercepted a PL-15.. yet they couldn't find a one tonne 7.5 meter missile debris..

1749403064032.png

When a missile is intercepted mid-air by an AD system:
  • It is usually shattered or broken into fragments.
  • The interceptor either explodes near the missile (proximity fuse) or...
  • Like
  • Haha
Click to expand...
Lol..

Did you even read what I wrote?

If a missile is intercepted, it is not completely destroyed in majority of the cases. So surely, there might be many broken parts of Fatah missile you guys have collected..

Proofs pleeej.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 29 (members: 3, guests: 26)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top