Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Ok so pakistan had upper hand. But should we stop talking about rafales and indians losing land or soldiers killed.

Rather focus on things that pakistan lacks so we can look more educated.

There is nothing more to discuss or argue on indian losses. India had losses even educated indians know it.

Pakistan lacks

1. No. of air defenses like hq9, hq 16 to defeat bm and cruise missile

2. Ammunition stock of fattah, cruise missiles need to be in 1000s

3. More drones specially cheaper suicide drones

4. Fiber optic for battlefield theatres for ssg commandos

5. Elint, sigint, cyber warfare ground based cant just rely on saab 2000

6. Tanks with protection from suicide drones

Atleast give mobile aa guns with tank formations.

7. More aa guns for bases as drones of small calibre should not be downed by wasting munitions

8. Better ballistic missiles specially in speed by reducing weight and better rocket boosters. As per my knowledge we already have been working but not announced. Even heard fattah have potential to be short range missile and uses composites. No source of information

9. Soldiers with portable anti drone soft kill systems

10. Install more aa guns on ships 12.7mm is adequate as navy ships will also be targetted, high chance they will be.

11. Acquoustic radars for drones if possible or optical radars

12. Hardened structure hangars for important planes.

13. Or lift based underground hangars. Like in aircraft carrier ( never seen in real life but has potential ) I am CS major with additionally 3d designer and game developer as well so ill make demo for showing what I mean.

14. Portable canister launchers to down drones, again drone stuff cause drones will be main terror weapon after missile. Cant rely on soft kills only

15. Small boats with type 730b could act as good point defense for heavy navy formations.
 

Trump’s claim on averting India-Pakistan war gains new life


Anwar Iqbal
July 9, 2025

The Trump administration on Tuesday doubled down on its narrative that US President Donald Trump played a central role in defusing a potentially nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan in May.

In a high-visibility moment at the White House on Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu handed Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize, citing, among other things, Trump’s “decisive diplomacy” in resolving disputes.

This symbolic endorsement comes amid growing signs that the Trump administration is carefully shaping its South Asia message — amplifying its version of regional stability while deliberately avoiding any confrontation with India or with Pakistan’s current leadership.

The evolving narrative was further underscored at the State Department’s daily news briefing — the first to publicly address both the ceasefire claim and ex-PM Imran Khan’s continued detention during Trump’s second term in office.


Asked about Indian officials’ repeated denials of Trump’s role in the 2025 Line of Control ceasefire, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce avoided taking a position. “So many comments speak for themselves,” she said.

“That’s one of the good news aspects of our modern world — people can see what’s really occurring. You’re not reliant on a comment to know what has really happened.”

Pressed further, Bruce added, half in jest: “Everyone will have an opinion. That’s an opinion. Some opinions are wrong. Mine rarely are, but other people’s opinions can be wrong.” She laughed and moved on.

The comments came just hours after Trump himself revisited the claim during his joint appearance with Netanyahu. “We stopped a lot of fights. A very, very big one was India and Pakistan. We stopped that over trade,” Trump said. “They were maybe at a nuclear stage. Stopping that was really important.”

He added that the United States had used the threat of suspending trade talks to pressure both governments and that he had personally contacted the leadership in New Delhi and Islamabad. He also referenced a meeting with Pakistan’s army chief as part of the de-escalation effort.

While Islamabad has not only endorsed this version but also submitted its own Nobel nomination for Trump last month, India continues to strongly refute it.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar reiterated this position after a recent meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, telling reporters that “President Trump had nothing to do with the ceasefire.” Indian officials have repeatedly emphasised that the de-escalation was prompted by internal military-level communications, not foreign mediation.

The Trump administration, however, has chosen not to affirm India’s denial — allowing President Trump’s pro-Pakistan narrative to stand uncontested.

For observers in Islamabad, this is significant. Not only is Trump being publicly credited by Pakistan, but the US government, for now, appears content to let that version circulate internationally — a quiet but unmistakable nod to Pakistan’s strategic utility in Washington’s broader diplomatic framework.
 
Very valid point here, IAF can line up all 35 jets at the airbases and let the press see and prove they lost only one.
 
Very valid point here, IAF can line up all 35 jets at the airbases and let the press see and prove they lost only one.
Too late .....they may add new ones to complete the count
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top