PAF Special Purpose Assets - News, Discussions & Updates

[RajaBaja]

View attachment 134124View attachment 134125View attachment 134126View attachment 134127View attachment 134128View attachment 134129

Good effort. AD, Radars and Stand off weapons need to be updated. You still have data from 2010. I'd focus more on post 2022 public data only.

 

[hassan1]

Can you provide which book that is from? ISBN etc.

 

[Yasser76]

View attachment 134401

WOW!

Those two are still alive!?

I bought the first book back in early 90s.

 

[Faceless]

@Oscar We've had some X accounts post the purported serial numbers of the IAF planes the PAF claimed to have shot down. Would there be an actual reason why the IAF would not come back and show said planes in good working order? I'm not asking to imply the planes were lost, just trying to figure out of there's an end-user restriction or protocol that would prevent such a thing.

For the same reason PAF might not want to give a tour of it's facilities to prove Endians are lying and there was no actual damage on the ground, no radars, Erieyes were lost. It serves no purpose and you may accidentally end up humiliating yourself instead by accepting that some losses have infact occurred instead of keeping all the losses disputed and have some deniability on your actual losses

 

[Toxic]

WOW!

Those two are still alive!?

I bought the first book back in early 90s.

Holy! Old fossils here damn

 

[Toxic]

For the same reason PAF might not want to give a tour of it's facilities to prove Endians are lying and there was no actual damage on the ground, no radars, Erieyes were lost. It serves no purpose and you may accidentally end up humiliating yourself instead by accepting that some losses have infact occurred instead of keeping all the losses disputed and have some deniability on your actual losses

There is proof of IAF loses so more loses is not unrealistic, have you seen a single photo of a erieye lose? Have your babu's actually made claim of destroying erieyes? No right?

 

[Yasser76]

For the same reason PAF might not want to give a tour of it's facilities to prove Endians are lying and there was no actual damage on the ground, no radars, Erieyes were lost. It serves no purpose and you may accidentally end up humiliating yourself instead by accepting that some losses have infact occurred instead of keeping all the losses disputed and have some deniability on your actual losses

Pretty convaluted way of coping.

PAF have indeed opened up to the editor of one of the world's most respected aviation magazines.

He is in Pakistan now and he himself has tweeted he has seen "convincing proof" of 4 Rafale losses and PAF have been showing him around damaged air bases.

So that pretty much blows away your entire argument.

The full report is being released in Thursay in the August issue, which i am told if the mist widley anticipated issue in a long time. PAF apparently revealing info to Warnes we have only revealed to very close allies like Turkey and China up till now.

You and every Bakht here will need a massive of cope next week.

There is a Punjabi phrase, roughly translated it means "Now I am really not going to let you go". Usually said just before a massive beating is administred.

"Ma took key ne joorangay"

 

[Scorpio]

Do PAF interested in induction of new fuel tanks ... Current fleet is too old airframe.. don't know how much life Left in them

 

[CSAW]

 

[Zephyrus]

View attachment 134503

This is Pakistan Army Aviation.

 

[Zephyrus]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Here you go guys.

 

[Waterboy]

Any updates on our havsoj?

 

[Areesh]

For the same reason PAF might not want to give a tour of it's facilities to prove Endians are lying and there was no actual damage on the ground, no radars, Erieyes were lost. It serves no purpose and you may accidentally end up humiliating yourself instead by accepting that some losses have infact occurred instead of keeping all the losses disputed and have some deniability on your actual losses

Still doing this buffoonry?

Firt ask your monkey airforce to officially claim destroying PAF Erieyes and I am sure PAF would line up all of its AWACS to humiliate you guys one more time

Yeah PAF won't do this for jeets claiming various losses due to being high on copium

 

[Baibers_1260]

Still doing this buffoonry?

Firt ask your monkey airforce to officially claim destroying PAF Erieyes and I am sure PAF would line up all of its AWACS to humiliate you guys one more time

Yeah PAF won't do this for jeets claiming various losses due to being high on copium

Grudging admission from the enemy about Pakistan Air Forc's technical edge, long term planning and acquisition of platforms and operational expertise.
@Zephyrus @Yasser76 @Toxic @JalalUdDin @Master Chief

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[baqai]

For the same reason PAF might not want to give a tour of it's facilities to prove Endians are lying and there was no actual damage on the ground, no radars, Erieyes were lost. It serves no purpose and you may accidentally end up humiliating yourself instead by accepting that some losses have infact occurred instead of keeping all the losses disputed and have some deniability on your actual losses

Ahem! if i am not wrong, i read Alan Warnes posting about his visits to different bases which were part / target of the episode.