PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
RajaBaja said:
4th gen is a tag line and so is 4.5 gen. In Indo-Pak war, this myth was also busted. What did we put in front of the IAF? Our 4th gen's or the 4th gens with top of the line PL-15 capability? I hope you can understand the point.

In a fight, when one has a longer range rifle, you don't semi long range rifles or pistols. You employ longer range weapons also and keep the short range for point defense.

Over 100 of our JFT's and 75 F-16's now come under this category. AMRAAM C-5 and SD-10A's don't do it and they've become second tier aircraft, can't fight with Meteors with near 180 KM range and a large NEZ. You can call these jets Gen 10, doesn't matter. I need the "long stick" "full system employment" not just the carrying platform like ACM Orangzaib referred to in his briefings.


Let's see now:
J-10C's: 25 total with PL-15
JF-17 block III: 30? with PL-15?
That's a total of: 55 planes with top capability with PL-15.

F-16's:75 with AIM-120 C5. Second tier.
JFT block I and II with SD-10A: 126 jets. Second tier
126 JFT block I and II's, they need urgent upgrades to AESA radars for PL-15 integration I believe. The rest of block III standard upgrades can happen gradually. But these must become PL-15 capable rather quickly. Before India can think of a round II.

Do the numbers now, per the war doctrine and to be effective against the enemy, we ONLY have 55 jets with PL-15's.

Hoping this number's increasing with AESA upgrades soon. JF-17 block I and II and F-16's don't really count as front fighters because Rafale and upgraded SU-30's will have almost 50-80 KM range advantage over them. You can add them in the equation when they get PL-15 and AIM-120D's (if we get them).
Click to expand...
with a highly networked strike package and effective 3rd party kill chain, a Block I/II plane is just a missile truck it does not need a new radar.
 
RafaleSlayer said:
with a highly networked strike package and effective 3rd party kill chain, a Block I/II plane is just a missile truck it does not need a new radar.
Click to expand...
A missile truck with only 4 BVR missiles :ROFLMAO:. First learn the true meaning of a term you are using. F-15 can be a missile truck with near two dozen AMRAAMS. F-16 under any circumstances is NEVER considered a missile truck with 6 AMRAAMS loaded. Because the term requires quantity.

Next, a weapon system isn't built or bought because you "wish and hope" it will work in a kill chain with AWACS. Taking out an AWACS in a battle could take less than 5 minutes if you are capable enough. Then what??

A weapon system is built or bought because it can operate on its own if support aircrafts and aircover of AWACS is gone. With that, you need an AESA in. Otherwise, if I listen to you, we don't even need radars right?
 
Fatman17 said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

فضائیہ نے کافی اچھے کام کیے ہیں

مگر جس نے بھی پہل کی اِسکے تھلے لگنے کی اُس کو فور سٹار سکائی مارشل بنا دو



@Panzerkiel @Windjammer @side-winder
 
Hakikat ve Hikmet said:

Why the Pakistan Air Force's Future is in Drones, Not Fighter Jets​


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


This not just Pakistan. Modern warfare is increasingly shifting toward unmanned systems, AI, and autonomous technology.
 
Oscar said:
فضائیہ نے کافی اچھے کام کیے ہیں

مگر جس نے بھی پہل کی اِسکے تھلے لگنے کی اُس کو فور سٹار سکائی مارشل بنا دو



@Panzerkiel @Windjammer @side-winder
Click to expand...
Next AFM issues are gonna be heart burns for Indians for sure......i am sure he has learnt from last time and kept a good civil/libel lawyers on retainer....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top