Top 10 OIC military power ranking

[Farhan23]

Algeria vs France war scenario how it will play out. Algeria is militarily strong.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Farhan23]

Morocco vs Spain war scenario

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

---

Morocco vs Algeria war scenario

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Farhan23]

This video was made when Iran was completely overhyped but this guy was following equipment, army size etc etc. Not delulu.

It was a draw war but if he makes it today KSA VS Iran it would be clear KSA win

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Pakistan vs KSA I don´t think Pakistan can beat KSA conventionally without the Use of Nukes this is real talk based on military calculations not some delulu

 

[ety]

Pakistan should be number-1 by all means.

- Massive size of active military and each service / and related equipment.
- 4.5 gen fighter aircrafts
- Long range air-air missiles. (PL15s) . TuAF currently has legacy AMRAAMs, not the first look first shoot capability. (they will get 120D in future)
- Pakistan has enormous Ballistic missile inventory (0 to 2750 KMs)
- Pakistan has MIRVs
- Super sonic AshMs, supersonic Air to surface missiles.
- Above all nukes of all kinds (Strategic, tactical)


Turkey is modernizing very fast, it may get to number1. but not yet.

Secondly, Iran should be in top-5. If any muslim country has a bigger BM arsenal then Pakistan that is Iran. and maybe bit better too (as its their only deterrence). Secondly, Iran has very good drone capability. Their military strategy is not traditional but based on ambush tactics, means 100s of missile boats instead of frigates etc. They can survive much longer with those tactics and has ability to strike back. Only Iran and Pakistan can do long distance strikes with their long range missiles.

Pakistan is the only country with nukes, that should be the first consideration making the list.

 

[Abdulaziz]

I Would like to put this delusions to rest.

Egypt beats Israel 10/10 times in a war today if there is no Nuclear weapons involved. Anyone who can´t see this needs to go re-study everything about war and military equipment.

It won´t even be a close fight. After few months Israel´s airforce will be out either shoot down via dog-fights or air defense system. Then there will be a huge conventional clash in the Sinai and South Israel and each time the result will be the same if you try that in 10 out of 10 times in simulations..

It is no brainer...

 

[Michael]

1. Turkey (Good everywhere including weapons production)
2. Pakistan (Good everywhere including has good suppliers)
3. Egypt (Good everywhere has production capacity)
4. Indonesia (Good everywhere and has good navy production)
5. KSA (Good everywhere, plus improving weapons production and has good suppliers)
6. Algeria (Good everywhere, plus strong navy, needs better supplier, involved in arms race)
7. Morocco ( Good everywhere and has good suppliers)
8. UAE ( Good everywhere, improved weapons production capacity)
9. Malaysia (Good everywhere but needs to improve it´s air force bulk)
10. Jordan (Good everywhere but has little to low population 12m which decreases them on the list)

I will list top 16 as bonus

11. Bangladesh (Has large manpower base and getting better could see them in top 10 in the next 5 years depending on their procurement, needs airforce upgrade)
12. Uzbekistan (It only lacks to improve it´s airforce I heard they will purchase J10 soon, it has population potential, plus fiercer people)
13. Kazakhstan (It also needs to improve it´s air it has SU-30s but still it needs to improve upon that otherwise overall very good army)
14. Iran (They have lost alot of tech but weak air defense and air force has sink them to 14 place but they can´t go lower due to population potential)
15. Qatar/Azerbaijan (Very solid armament both Airforce and conventional) and as for Azeribaijan they will soon jump into top 10 as Turkey is constantly selling them best stuff

I really don't understand what the point of this kind of ranking analysis is? Its only effect is to create more rifts between OIC member countries.
Is one country more powerful than another?
Is one country better equipped than another?
Does one country have more combat experience than another?
This kind of BS topic will never have a clear answer.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Farhan23 how about

Egypt-Turkey-Saudi-Iran , attacking Israel scenario ?

Saudi vs Iran or Turkey vs Saudi , These are old scenarios, what do you say "Abdul Aziz"?

F15 fleet ready for it ? or they need more practice?

ha ha ha

 

[Meengla]

Sorry, but that whole "Mini Sparta of the Middle East": quote was by a US general ingratiating himself to the Emiratis.
The UAE have some seriously good kit, but like the Indians, struggle to translate this into capability.
I really do not mean to offend here, but asl many about attitude and work ethic of Emirati officers and it is not a good answer.

Pakistan #1 due to a full spectrum of challenges and experiences spanning 8 decades domestically and against a powerful enemy to its east AND confronting two SUPERPOWERS in Afghanistan for one and two decades.
Iran and Turkey would be #2 or 3. I can't decide who'd be 2 or 3.
The rest... better not say much.

 

[Farhan23]

I Would like to put this delusions to rest.

Egypt beats Israel 10/10 times in a war today if there is no Nuclear weapons involved. Anyone who can´t see this needs to go re-study everything about war and military equipment.

It won´t even be a close fight. After few months Israel´s airforce will be out either shoot down via dog-fights or air defense system. Then there will be a huge conventional clash in the Sinai and South Israel and each time the result will be the same if you try that in 10 out of 10 times in simulations..

It is no brainer...

Well Said. This is precise.

 

[Farhan23]

Farhan23 how about

Egypt-Turkey-Saudi-Iran , attacking Israel scenario ?

Saudi vs Iran
Turkey vs Saudi

These are old scenarios, what do you say "Abdul Aziz"?

F15 fleet ready for it ? or they need more practice?

If no nukes involved it won´t be a fight at all. If nukes involved and they can borrow 3-4 warheads. It would be over before afternoon. Israel is very small and one strike could end war.

..

If these scenarios were renewed and made today it would favor the Saudis more, they are pacing ahead.

 

[Meengla]

I Would like to put this delusions to rest.
Egypt beats Israel 10/10 times in a war today if there is no Nuclear weapons involved. Anyone who can´t see this needs to go re-study everything about war and military equipment.
It won´t even be a close fight. After few months Israel´s airforce will be out either shoot down via dog-fights or air defense system. Then there will be a huge conventional clash in the Sinai and South Israel and each time the result will be the same if you try that in 10 out of 10 times in simulations..

It is no brainer...

A few months???! Hah!!
Buddy: Egypt wouldn't even have an Air Force jets to attack Israel before even the hostilies would begin. Egypt is right next to Israel so targeting them jets while still in the hangers would be a cake walk for Israel+NATO. Even Iran, a long distance away, has wisely stayed away from having an air force.
Having said that, Egypt does have the advantage of a large population willing to die if comes to that for their 'cause' and could very well overwhelm Israel in massive waves. Israelis are basically cowards.

 

[Abdulaziz]

A few months???! Hah!!
Buddy: Egypt wouldn't even have an Air Force jets to attack Israel before even the hostilies would begin. Egypt is right next to Israel so targeting them jets while still in the hangers would be a cake walk for Israel+NATO. Even Iran, a long distance away, has wisely stayed away from having an air force.
Having said that, Egypt does have the advantage of a large population willing to die if comes to that for their 'cause' and could very well overwhelm Israel in massive waves. Israelis are basically cowards.

You just saying bunch of stuff bro. Read carefully what I said. It was to the point.

And Yes there will be massive dog-fights over the airspace and Israel will lose alot of fighter jets in the process not only from the dog-fights but from the air defense systems. Hence they will be out. This scenario doesn´t factor NATO into this picture that would have been something different.

Egypt has the Military capability to beat Israel without the involvement of nuclear weapons, Egypt beats them 10 out of 10 times it won´t even be a competition.

 

[Meengla]

You just saying bunch of stuff bro. Read carefully what I said. It was to the point.

And Yes there will be massive dog-fights over the airspace and Israel will lose alot of fighter jets in the process not only from the dog-fights but from the air defense systems. Hence they will be out. This scenario doesn´t factor NATO into this picture that would have been something different.

Egypt has the Military capability to beat Israel without the involvement of nuclear weapons, Egypt beats them 10 out of 10 times it won´t even be a competition.

Israel is not going to take on Egypt without America, which means not without NATO.
And, no, there will not be any 'dog fight'. India and Pakistan are peer airforces and they don't do the 'dog fights' anymore. Egypt Air Force is primitive in comparison with Israel. Sad to say that. Egypt is better off sending waves of soldiers who'd be willing to die in large numbers--not that I am suggesting that.
Only countries like Iran, Turkey and Pakistan can take on Israel conventionally, with Pakistan having advantage of the nuclear weapons as a huge advantage.

 

[PakFactor]

. . .

 

[Abdulaziz]

Israel is not going to take on Egypt without America, which means not without NATO.
And, no, there will not be any 'dog fight'. India and Pakistan are peer airforces and they don't do the 'dog fights' anymore. Egypt Air Force is primitive in comparison with Israel. Sad to say that. Egypt is better off sending waves of soldiers who'd be willing to die in large numbers--not that I am suggesting that.
Only countries like Iran, Turkey and Pakistan can take on Israel conventionally, with Pakistan having advantage of the nuclear weapons as a huge advantage.

Iran is currently militia level they have been exposed militarily forget about them alltogther.

Egypt´s Air force is not primitive... The so-called F.35 is actully not good which is why Israel´s so-called air dominance comes from F-16s.

Egypt has BVR´s and good radar which means dog-fights will happen over the airspace 100%. We understand what this piece of electronic junk stuff can do.

Hence airforce won´t be much of a factor it will strike stragetic areas and then vanish from the conflict.

You seem to understand this conflict will only end in one way and that is an Egyptian victory