Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

A before and after image would make it easier to work out the extent of what was hit/destroyed. Right now, to me at least, it looks like a very near miss(ie landing just before the main storage hanger)? Since the large hanger/storage site looks like it took minor damage. There may have been something else that was targetted and destroyed outright but not possible to see that.
 
Last edited:
Ali_Baba said:
A before and after image would make it easier to work out the extent of what was hit/destroyed. Right now, to me at least, it looks like a near miss(ie landing just before the main storage hanger)? Since the large hanger/storage site looks like it took minor damage. There may have been something else that was targetted and destroyed outright but not possible to see that.
Click to expand...

Does look like a miss in all honesty
 
Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
IAF regroups or not..

more pertinent for Pakistan is active AD on the indian side..

Pak. needs strong shielding against income missile threats, fast!
Click to expand...
These is no assured shield against incoming missiles and if it is Hypersonic.....the probability of interception further reduces....
Only shield is your own missile capability....enemy must fear about what will be the retaliation and counter strike and the resulted impact......that will keep them to launch missile in the first place.
 
NA71 said:
These is no assured shield against incoming missiles and if it is Hypersonic.....the probability of interception further reduces....
Only shield is your own missile capability....enemy must fear about what will be the retaliation and counter strike and the resulted impact......that will keep them to launch missile in the first place.
Click to expand...

Dispersal and HAS are the best defence here
 
samsite84 said:
Your reply is subterfuge. Of all the things you mentioned about India, similar things exist for Pakistan, China, USA you name it. Point being: countries have territorial claims and most are resolved one way or another.

Having said that, was partition "perfect" - we all know it wasn't and neither was the mechanism or timeline. However, I don't see people of any of the non-Kashmir states revolting. In fact, its Baluchistan and KPK - areas which many can claim Pakistan "annexed" which have a situation.

I will state this again: Has India claimed any lands geographically in the last 20-30 years (if not more) that will prove its "Akhand Bharat" designs?

I do however believe that the mindset of Pakistanis (not all but some significant portion) that India wants to usurp Pakistan or doesn't believe in legitimacy are causes of continuous conflict. And IMO, its self-inflicted pain.

India has treated Pakistan as a sovereign nation. India's PM went to Minar-e-Pakistan, embraced his counterpart only to get Kargil. Still, India's stance towards Pakistan's sovereign integrity hasn't change.
Click to expand...
This accusation of subterfuge is a bit rich coming from the nation that now overwhelmingly and unashamedly bashes the "we like Modi for his economic policies (and ignore his genocidal acts and statements)".

It is the height of hypocrisy for Delhi to declare any other nation as being guilty of clandestine male fide intent when the very nation of India was birthed and midwifed through subterfuge and deception.

As for what has been "claimed" in the last 20-30 years, the hubris is truly a sight to behold. Jammu & Kashmir itself is a recognised disputed territory by the UN, which India not only continuously "claims" but actually occupies parts thereof.

Frankly, your comments seem to be detached from reality. This is why observers speak quite freely now of the "echo chamber".

As Eurolabs pointed out some years back, the disinformation emanating from Delhi is far reaching, but it seems to have also taken hold domestically.

Strategically, this is actually a weakness. No nation should actually  delude its citizens to the point where they actually genuinely believe that nation's own propaganda. This leaves those citizens vulnerable and exposed the moment they step beyond said echo chamber and fall under genuine scrutiny.
 
Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

"Cambodia which does not have a proper air force had resort to MLRS as it's main offensive weapon.
Pakistan faced a similar situation on 10 May 2025, when it had to resort to Fatah MLRS and loitering munitions as PAF was incapable of mounting any major air to ground strikes"

What kind of detachment from reality breeds such ignorant comments on X?

This Indian is actually saying Pakistan is the one who "does not have a proper air force" while his air force enjoyed extended ground leave during an active conflict only 2 months ago.
 
Indian Gobar defense forum claiming that we have tested Ababeel MIRV ballistic missile on 22nd July, 2025 which failed and debris fell near civilian population in Baluchistan.

As per my Info Pakistan always issue notam which was issued but not for missile testing since Ababeel 2200 Kms range so it is not possible to test it under current issued NOTAM.


Any further info?
 
Indians will always present May 9 and 10 as main features of op sindoor ...no mention of may 5/6 battle because the lost those hours.

Our Response on May 9/10 was a causious one and we wanted to keep the escalation in control....

On every media plateform Indians are now advocating to use missile strikes as better option against Pakistan in next episode coming .....

We should have used more options on 9th and 10th other than F1/F2 and SH15 to inflict heavy damages
 
Yasser76 said:
Yes, PAF jets just no wrecgahe right? IAF just being modest....

Clown

Been on here two days, lets see how long you last...
Click to expand...
Didn’t someone claim that two more Indian jets were downed, based on an Indian report suggesting two PAF jets were actually shot over Srinagar? You either accept Indian reporting or reject it entirely — you can’t cherry-pick. The clownery lies elsewhere, my friend
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 71 (members: 3, guests: 68)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top