Chinese PLAAF News

But the problem is the US cannot commit, say, 3000 planes in East Asia because it has other commitments too. What would happen to Europe if you emptied it of planes? Russia will just walk unopposed into Ukraine. How about the Middle East? Can Israel alone handle Iran? Not likely based on the recent war. So those numbers are not real.

Besides, when it comes to push to shove, China will easily outproduce the West. Forget about Japan and Korea; they will never want to get involved in a war with China because that will result in their destruction. They are not dumb. In fact, now they question the whole security arrangement with the US. China has quite many 5th-generation fighters now. Let's see just off the back 500 J-10 all varieties.400 J 16, 400 J 20, 200 J11B, 350 J11A, Su 27, Su 30 etc, 200 JH7 SO ROUGHLY 2000 MODERN FIGHTERS.

Number alone doesn't tell the story. Logistics, production capacities, etc, will determine the outcome of a war. At the onset of WWII, Japan had 10 AC carriers vs 3 for the US. Now, what is the result of the Midway fight? The US just outproduced Japan to win World War WWII
Before China became this assertive, whenever Chinese ships were involved in sea conflicts with the Philippines and other nations US always sent warships and warnings against China, as if they were always ready to fight China in the South China Sea, but now, the deafening silence from US after the recent major China-Philippines sea clashes speaks volume, US only respects power.
 
One cannot compete against a highly disciplined, billion plus nation who act as a hive. The Confucius hierarchical model, where your manager is like above anything, bind things together like a well oiled machine. America enjoyed it status because of the good will it had before things turned on their head post 9/11. You lose repo, decline is inevitable. China is shaping the new world order.
 
Chinese Hypersonic Missiles are 2-3 generations ahead of Iran's latest Hypersonics.

Therefore, even without parity in the numbers of aircrafts and fighter jets, China can easily sink USN Aircraft Carriers in any war scenario, nullifying US advantage in carrier aviation even more!

But IMHO, the main threat comes from USN's massive Underwater Submarine force, with dozens of SSNs able to strike from below making it unsafe for PLAN operations.

A Nuclear Warning must be made to USA not to intervene if China really has to take Taiwan, because PLAN has no answer to the many USN SSNs that can strike PLAN ships with Anti-ship Cruise Missiles from Standoff ranges using Tomahawk anti-ship variants...
 
I do see at some point China militarily and economically over taking the US. However when it does, then what?

What the US has are strong alliances in Asia, Europe, other areas. China has historically taken an insular position, will that remain I wonder.
 
Chinese Hypersonic Missiles are 2-3 generations ahead of Iran's latest Hypersonics.

Therefore, even without parity in the numbers of aircrafts and fighter jets, China can easily sink USN Aircraft Carriers in any war scenario, nullifying US advantage in carrier aviation even more!

But IMHO, the main threat comes from USN's massive Underwater Submarine force, with dozens of SSNs able to strike from below making it unsafe for PLAN operations.

A Nuclear Warning must be made to USA not to intervene if China really has to take Taiwan, because PLAN has no answer to the many USN SSNs that can strike PLAN ships with Anti-ship Cruise Missiles from Standoff ranges using Tomahawk anti-ship variants...
Yes, Submarine is a potent threat to the Mainland. But compared to years ago, China has improved ASW by installing the undersea Great Wall. Stationing a listening post in the Marianna channel, etc.

The number of Chinese conventional subs like Yuan has multiplied many times over the last 10 years. Beside Tomahawk is a subsonic missile, easy prey for point defence

They will be stationed on the choke points all along the Bashi Channel, Miyako Channel, etc. A large number of KQ 200s, KJ 500s, etc, are available now. They keep watch 24/7, not to mention sensitive radar all along the coast.

New Details on China’s KQ-200 Maritime Patrol Aircraft​

  • Published on 29/04/2019
  • By Xavier Vavasseur
  • In News
A recent video report by CCTV sheds some new light on the KQ-200 Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy).

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The KQ-200 (also known as Y-8Q or GX-6 or High New 6) MPA is based on the Y-8 Category III Platform featuring WJ-6C turboprops with 6-blade each. The Y-8 is a medium transport aircraft produced by Shaanxi Aircraft Corporation (SAC), itself based on the Soviet An-12. Y-8 Category III is the base platform for most Chinese special mission aircraft.


The KQ-200 is designed to equip the PLAN Air Force (naval aviation force) of the North Sea Fleet and South Sea Fleet.


The first two prototypes were first seen at the SAC factory airfield in November 2011. The mass production is believed to have begun in 2015. According to our colleagues from East Pendulum, a new final assembly line was opened in December 2016, the answer the high demand for the platform.


New-Details-on-Chinas-KQ-200-Maritime-Patrol-Aircraft-1024x495.jpg
KQ-200 MPA of the PLAN

The aircraft has a range of approximately 5,000 km and a patrol endurance of about 10 hours.


The KQ-200 range from Lingshui Air Base, estimated at 2,000 km. Image via EastPendulum.

The KQ-200 is equipped with a surface search radar (under the nose), an electro-optic payload under the fuselage and a magnetic anomaly detector (MAD) at its tail.

It is fitted with four openings to deploy sonobuoys (SQ-4 and SQ-5 by AVIC), and a cargo bay that can carry anti-submarine grenades and torpedoes. Rumors mention the ability to carry four YJ-83K anti-ship missiles under the KQ-200 wings, but this has yet to be confirmed.
 
I do see at some point China militarily and economically over taking the US. However when it does, then what?

What the US has are strong alliances in Asia, Europe, other areas. China has historically taken an insular position, will that remain I wonder.


I believe, and it's just my opinion, that USA have over spent it's soft power over its allies and it also over spent it's "attacks" on its enemies.

Now Iran, China, NK, Russia are not afraid at all of any USA attack or sanctions. While its allies are also having second thoughts and thinking seriously about a policy shift.
 
It's going to have a global paradigm shift, alliances formed against each other will be gone in the future. Besides, when you are strong, others will come to you and when you become weak, others will leave, there's no forever allies or foes.
 
I believe, and it's just my opinion, that USA have over spent it's soft power over its allies and it also over spent it's "attacks" on its enemies.

Now Iran, China, NK, Russia are not afraid at all of any USA attack or sanctions. While its allies are also having second thoughts and thinking seriously about a policy shift.
Law of diminishing returns.
 
It's going to have a global paradigm shift, alliances formed against each other will be gone in the future. Besides, when you are strong, others will come to you and when you become weak, others will leave, there's no forever allies or foes.
Does that mean in future you may hug Modi and say adiós to your Iron brother ? Bad news for china worshipping Pakistanis.
 
It's going to have a global paradigm shift, alliances formed against each other will be gone in the future. Besides, when you are strong, others will come to you and when you become weak, others will leave, there's no forever allies or foes.

Yes, certainly I see Japan, South Korea and even Australia taking a more "realistic" view of alliances in the next 5-10 years.

US commitment to Taiwan is lukewarm (not that it was ever 100%). Once US backs away from that, what is left?

All countries nearby have much more to gain by closely integrating with China economically.

Europe is declining into irrelevence slowly, but surely.
 
After seeing the new Chinese weapon, Trump fires Pentagon innovation chief
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


After getting intelligence assessment of China's new weapon lineup for the 3 Sep 80th Anniversary of WW2 Victory Parade - Trump fired the Pentagon Innovation Chief for lack of innovation!During rehearsals for its September 3, 2025, 80th-anniversary parade, China has displayed several new and highly advanced military weapons.

These systems are aimed at showcasing the country's military modernization and serve as a strategic message to potential rivals, particularly the United States.New Weapon Systems DisplayedBased on reports and leaked images from rehearsals, the new and upgraded weapon systems include: * Hypersonic Missiles: This is the most significant category of new weapons. Several new missiles from the YJ series were spotted, including the YJ-17, YJ-19, and YJ-20.

These missiles are believed to be hypersonic, with one reportedly having a hypersonic glide vehicle similar to the existing DF-17. Their ability to fly at more than five times the speed of sound and maneuver in flight makes them extremely difficult to intercept by current missile defense systems. * New Ballistic Missiles: An armored vehicle carrying a massive missile canister was seen, which analysts believe could be a new road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) system. The design suggests either a new system or a major upgrade to an existing one, indicating an expansion of China's strategic deterrence capabilities. *

Unmanned Systems: China is putting a strong emphasis on unmanned warfare. The parade rehearsals have included: * Extra-Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs): These torpedo-shaped drones are significantly larger than existing models, posing a new threat for naval operations. * Unmanned Tanks: A new tank with a 105mm main gun and an unmanned turret has been seen. The crews were reportedly wearing augmented reality helmets, signaling the integration of human-machine combat systems. *

Drones and Counter-Drone Systems: The parade will feature a range of new drones and ground-based vehicles equipped with laser weapons and other systems designed to take out enemy drones.Implications for the United StatesThe display of these new weapons has significant implications for U.S. military strategy and the balance of power, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. * Countering U.S. Naval Power: The new hypersonic and anti-ship missiles (YJ series) are a direct threat to U.S. naval assets, especially aircraft carriers, which are the cornerstone of American power projection.

These weapons are a key component of China's anti-access and area denial (A2/AD) strategy, which aims to prevent U.S. forces from operating effectively in a potential conflict over Taiwan or in the South China Sea. * Strategic Deterrence: The potential new ICBM system, along with the rapid expansion of China's nuclear arsenal, is a clear signal that Beijing is moving toward a more robust and survivable nuclear deterrent. This could degrade the credibility of the U.S.'s "extended deterrence" commitments to its allies in the region, such as Japan and South Korea, by raising the risk of nuclear escalation in a conflict. * Shifting Warfare Dynamics: The focus on unmanned systems, from sea drones to autonomous tanks, indicates that China is preparing for a new era of warfare that leverages AI, robotics, and integrated combat networks. This poses a challenge to the U.S. military, which must now contend with adversaries capable of overwhelming traditional defenses with large numbers of sophisticated, low-cost autonomous weapons. * Psychological and Deterrent Effect: Beyond their technical capabilities, the public display of these weapons is intended to be a psychological tool. China's message is one of transparency aimed at intimidation. The goal is to project an image of overwhelming strength to deter potential adversaries and weaken their resolve to intervene in a conflict, thereby "winning without fighting."Anyone wants to apply for the job of Pentagon Innovation Chief? Please write directly to [email protected] directly with your CV
 
Nope, still quite a ways to go before they can be called a superpower. But, if the fight is taking place near China, then the US will be on the backfoot.
 
@Beijingwalker , do you think China will produce 1000+ J-35 and 1000+ J-20 ?
Lemme do some math for you, assuming the average Chinese jet cost 100mil a pop, it will only take China 500bil to make 5000 jets. China's military expenditure a year is officially is 250bil$, assuming half is used to make jets, it will take China only 5 years to make 5000 jets if we wanted to but can we do it? It is better to do it over the span of 10 years, using 50 bil$ annually, and making 500 jets annually. Remember these are all NEW jets and not boneyard jets.
 
Chinese Hypersonic Missiles are 2-3 generations ahead of Iran's latest Hypersonics.

Therefore, even without parity in the numbers of aircrafts and fighter jets, China can easily sink USN Aircraft Carriers in any war scenario, nullifying US advantage in carrier aviation even more!

But IMHO, the main threat comes from USN's massive Underwater Submarine force, with dozens of SSNs able to strike from below making it unsafe for PLAN operations.

A Nuclear Warning must be made to USA not to intervene if China really has to take Taiwan, because PLAN has no answer to the many USN SSNs that can strike PLAN ships with Anti-ship Cruise Missiles from Standoff ranges using Tomahawk anti-ship variants...
yes nuclear subs are our real weakness not carriers. Carriers within a 1000km range from China is just a tincan. However, within 300km from Chinese coast, these subs can be nullified by Chinese conventional subs. Nuclear subs only offer longer endurance, within the first island chain, conventional subs are quieter and can endure roughly 2 weeks of warfare vs 3 months for nuke subs (food etc.)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top