Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot at campus event in Utah

It depends on which side of the spectrum you want to believe.

There are people on the left saying this is Trump trying to stir the pot and make an excuse to wait for all this to go to hell and declare a state of emergency, no more voting in 2026 and 2028.

There are also people on the right saying this is the left declaring war on the right, and they are going to fight. This is mainly going to lead to the same outcome I mentioned earlier.

There are always other reasons other than either left or right policy. Remember why John Hinckley wanted to assassinate Ronald Reagan? Hinckley tried to impress actress Jodie Foster.....Or why Sirhan Sirhan wanted to assassinate Robert Kennedy Sirhan think Kennedy betray him by selling Israel Fighter Jet (Even tho whether or not killing him changes nothing in this) If I have to guess, there are probably some other reason Robinson did it if it was him that did it, most likely just an troll act like the message he inscribe on the casing.
Very true. This seems like a deranged (and very “childish”? Considering the video game references like this murder was a game, sick) one man act, considering how casually he reached out to his roommate that day and bragged about his actions on discord the next day, before his dad turned him in.
 
More outrage than the killing of children in Sandyhook. Crazy how the "right" can manufacture rage.
Unlike the "left", who proceeded to riot and burn cities following the death of George Floyd, the "right" has taken no such actions since Wednesday.
 
Unlike the "left", who proceeded to riot and burn cities following the death of George Floyd, the "right" has taken no such actions since Wednesday.
Again people are being slaughtered at schools but people like Charlie say it is worth it to protect the second amendment.
 
You watch too many movies. You won't last five minutes against a trained soldier, let alone an invading force that has already overrun your military. While fantasizing this possible future scenario, you'll have innocent people killed, in peace time today, at the hands of those who should've never had access to a gun.



Whether you have a gun or not, the welcome mat will be there.

The French resistance was predominantly unarmed and performed mostly low level sabotage and reconnaissance. The majority of its ops were performed after June 1944 when the Germans had already started losing their grip. It also looted and attacked innocent French, such as the Tobacconists. It was supported and supplied by foreign military powers and did not fight with household weapons. Even then, after you've sifted through the Gaullist's romanticization/propaganda, it did not achieve anything of note. Le Chagrin et la Pitié is a good watch on the subject.

Best instead you save the kids that are today than what you will not achieve in a hypothetical future.
you clearly cannot grasp what I have said and have resorted to subpar insult.

I have said what I posted in this thread after a careful consideration over a very long duration. you choose to parade with a welcome mat on your arse! that's your choice and you are entitled to it.

there will always be two sets of people ones who will resist and those who will comply!
 
Tyler Robinson lived with a trans guy, Lance Twiggs, 22, who also informed the FBI about the Charlie Kirk murder.

u can be gay and republican how do i know because grindr crashes when republican events take place
 
Interesting facts coming out:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
More outrage than the killing of children in Sandyhook. Crazy how the "right" can manufacture rage.
They have been primed for a moment like this, by years of indoctrination. They way things are going, especially after seeing what happened to the South Koreans in Georgia, there might be an exodus of minorities (ethnic, political, cultural, etc.) from states like Utah, and if companies see a loss of critical talent, they may be forced to move out of some of these states as well.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Furthermore, while most/sane Americans don’t want to see political violence, now people are whitewashing Charlie’s stances and expecting people to mourn him.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Texas maybe about to see a continuation of more Latinos, more African Americans and more whites moving there but probably less and less of everyone else.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
The governor of Utah being a statesman, a leader, a true American, in trying to calm things down.

But while a great speech to sooth those traumatized and give perspective, especially at 11:30, that one person was responsible, but he did make an interesting comment about he wished it was a local. Listen from 12:00-13:00 (from another state, or another country) and watch Kash’s reaction behind him.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Ive only watch snippets of Charlie Kirk videos in the past I have been pondering why he is felt as so significant. In a sense he was a MLK like figure for the right wing Gen. Z and younger Millennials. He was trying to win the culture war in a way that would shift the culture, over the coming decade, as Trump would have retired and JD Vance, whom he helped get picked to be VP, would becomes prominent.

So for all the talk of fighting, I think the smart people, who will claim his legacy, will revise his image (as was partially done to MLK), removing the unsavory things he use to say, and continue debates after some months, especially leading up to the midterms, with a sense of righteous indignation, hoping to use his name to win the midterms.
 
Last edited:
Unlike the "left", who proceeded to riot and burn cities following the death of George Floyd, the "right" has taken no such actions since Wednesday.
Most did not riot during those protests, but of those that did, criminality (to riot and loot) was the motive not political action. With all three branches of the federal government in the hands of the right wing or leaning right, why would those on the right riot. They are in charge, and have the power to change things through the state.

I compare Charlie to MLK, not in general, but in the sense that each called their supporters to excellence as they perceived it. I wouldn’t be surprise if Charlie had given a similar speech to his “flock” of mostly young mostly male supporters.

Hence why we are seeing a similar sentiment, as African Americans in 1968 when MLK was killed. Btw, it was MLK that said “a riot is the language of the unheard”.

But just to be clear, I do not support the riots that occurred after the BLM protests.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
you clearly cannot grasp what I have said and have resorted to subpar insult.

I have said what I posted in this thread after a careful consideration over a very long duration. you choose to parade with a welcome mat on your arse! that's your choice and you are entitled to it.

there will always be two sets of people ones who will resist and those who will comply!

There was no insult in my post. You got offended by your own metaphor. Or maybe my counterargument.
 
Last edited:
More outrage than the killing of children in Sandyhook. Crazy how the "right" can manufacture rage.
This is because this was not done by Robinson.

This was a pro hit and Kirk had a real genuine following on the ground. He was appealing to the younger audience/right wing voting block and there are chances he would not have endorsed neither Vance nor any of Trump's kidsas the next presidentential candidates.

Tucker Carlson is the defacto spokesperson of the center/right AngloSaxon America. Kirck and Tucker Carlson were going to be the kingmakers because their endorsements would drive the voters into whatever presidential candidate camp. Eliminating Kirk at this stage, BEFORE he became the would-be vote driver ensures that the future presidential election cycles also remain in the current status-quo's hands.

This is like 9/11 all over again.
 
Some are saying this will be blamed on the perpetually online, especially those that follow people like Nick Fuentes, GROYPERS. Nick who called out Charlie for his bending to Trump’s actions, most recently with the Israel-Iran 12 day war.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




Here is Nick Fuentes response to the murder.

Btw side note, Nick Fuentes shows how much he hates people being killed in Gaza by the Israelis and the BS reasons the Israelis give to pretend to justify murder. 30:40-31:18. So he has no friends from those on the right that are pro-Israel.

Nick Fuentes is really truly MAGA. Focused on the youth.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Here is why Nick will be blamed: especially after the memory of the GROYPER wars will be brought up.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top