Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions

... As they raced towards each other and the missiles of the Indian fighters went ‘hot’, the PAF Commander gave the order from the NAIIOC (National ISR Air Ops Centre) to break their data links, which meant they would lose all situational awareness. Jamming from mobile EW units dotted all along the eastern fringes of Pakistan completed the damage. The Rafale’s cutting edge Thales Spectra integrated electronic warfare system was designed to protect the Indian Air Force’s jet. ...
Is this something new and India not aware of this?
 
No saar, actually all Ra-fails were shot down by mighty PAF, endia was at it's mercy, even IMF is scared of it.

Thanks for trying to divert the convo to lahore port which I didn't ever mentioned.
Where were we? Yeah the evidence for all of this...

Again, if you say this was not a mock drill, it is on PAF to show any BDA for their strikes at Barnala.

DGAO and DGMO made a lot of claims of hitting frontline Indian installations, causing "major damage", radio.gov.pk outright calls it destruction.

One wonders why isn't the destruction visible...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Mod Edit:
Pls don't use large fonts unnecessarily

___________________________


hold on a sec, what have i missed here?!!!!

For already announced drills, Mr. Sharminder Singh (who, by the way, is a fact-checker by profession no less and presumably who is already well aware about the dates of the drills!) needs to be told by a DC(DC himself needs clarification!) who received a communication from an Air Force officer about the nature of the blast!

This much head-wrangling and this many lies could severely impact the decision-making of ordinary Pakistanis.

Shamelessness is one thing, but you lot profit by creating this news hysteria.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People falling for marketing is kind of the point of marketing lol. However, it is good to know that people that matter look at science and simulations.
tbh, I do wonder though...there must have been a rationale for the EU to support Meteor and, likewise, the Turks to back not one, but two ramjet-powered AAM projects. I'm not discounting the proven efficacy of the rocket-motor approach re: PL-15, but there's got to be something else at play here. Could it be something like cruise efficiency or something (due to the air-breathing engine)? Maybe the EU thought of the Meteor back in the '80s as a way to deal with Russian bombers?
 
No saar, actually all Ra-fails were shot down by mighty PAF, endia was at it's mercy, even IMF is scared of it.

Thanks for trying to divert the convo to lahore port which I didn't ever mentioned.
Where were we? Yeah the evidence for all of this...

Again, if you say this was not a mock drill, it is on PAF to show any BDA for their strikes at Barnala.

DGAO and DGMO made a lot of claims of hitting frontline Indian installations, causing "major damage", radio.gov.pk outright calls it destruction.

One wonders why isn't the destruction visible...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Not all, just 4 Ra-fails as well as the rest & yes despite numerical disparity IAF was at the mercy of PAF. This epic humiliation after 2019 🤡 show and even after u had the ubber expensive Ra-fail 😂 Must be hard to live with, but u could least try to hide your shame.
 
tbh, I do wonder though...there must have been a rationale for the EU to support Meteor and, likewise, the Turks to back not one, but two ramjet-powered AAM projects. I'm not discounting the proven efficacy of the rocket-motor approach re: PL-15, but there's got to be something else at play here. Could it be something like cruise efficiency or something (due to the air-breathing engine)? Maybe the EU thought of the Meteor back in the '80s as a way to deal with Russian bombers?

The meteor reflects the security threats of the time it was incepted, but those design parameters are now problematic against the PL15E / AIM260 approach it seems. Given that there were no meteor launches, we do not know how effective the missile could be. Within its parameters, it maybe very effective but outranged by newer missiles.

EU has no replacement planned for the Meteor as of now.

The UK is looking at new long range BVR missile concepts as part of the GCAP project with the UK and Japan, and they are both working on some ideas. Japan has to face the China threat, so it needs a solution. The Meteor may be part of the initial armaments of GCAP/Tempest, but i suspect something may come along later which looks very different from the Meteor.
 
tbh, I do wonder though...there must have been a rationale for the EU to support Meteor and, likewise, the Turks to back not one, but two ramjet-powered AAM projects. I'm not discounting the proven efficacy of the rocket-motor approach re: PL-15, but there's got to be something else at play here. Could it be something like cruise efficiency or something (due to the air-breathing engine)? Maybe the EU thought of the Meteor back in the '80s as a way to deal with Russian bombers?
That is what I suspect. The meteor is meant to be a light(ish) missile with a long range to take out lumbering Russian bombers with a half-decent capability against jets. Like they want to do stuff like this that they probably can't do with a slightly bigger boy:
Screenshot 2025-09-17 105333.png

Don't get me wrong, the Meteor is probably a killer against the AIM120C7 for example.

Regarding the Turks - they do have an AIM120 analog as well - Gokdogan. They simply might be trying out solutions. Also they are likely gearing their fleet to fight Greek AAMRAMs and not PL-15s. But this is just speculation.

Also PL-15 is a later development so it is unfair to expect the Meteor to be able to outclass it. The Chinese probably went, here's a meteor, how do we defeat it.
 
So it's only once the projectile are in the air that you can say that tonight is the night.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve noticed a particular trend among these Indian trolls. They show up the moment there’s any hint of Indian incompetence and either try to divert the discussion or force people to change the subject. And if they’re caught, they don’t fight back—they just run away, because the job is already done. It’s as if they’re given very specific instructions or rules of engagement.


Supposedly, their role involves shaping opinions by tracking changes and intervening if they go against a pre-specified Indian agenda.


It’s like stirring people up to discourage clear and objective discussion, while never letting their presence be known!

what do you guys think? am i right?!

I have created a ChatGPT image, to get the message across!
 

Attachments

  • ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 04_03_16 PM.png
    ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 04_03_16 PM.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 10
I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve noticed a particular trend among these Indian trolls. They show up the moment there’s any hint of Indian incompetence and either try to divert the discussion or force people to change the subject. And if they’re caught, they don’t fight back—they just run away, because the job is already done. It’s as if they’re given very specific instructions or rules of engagement.


Supposedly, their role involves shaping opinions by tracking changes and intervening if they go against a pre-specified Indian agenda.


It’s like stirring people up to discourage clear and objective discussion, while never letting their presence be known!

what do you guys think? am i right?!

I have created a ChatGPT image, to get the message across!

100% this. I have been saying this on many threads.

We actually all know who the culprits are too. We all knew the Warns articles would cause them immense heart burn, and I suspected it would be derailed.
 
Have been going on
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



From Bathinda too
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



If you think it's shady, feel free to buy a Maxar imagery showing anything that damaged the site. Till date PAF hasn't released any imagery for this site.

It is a huge cope moment. This is a small piece of information someone has uploaded on X and fanboys are going berserk.

Respectable and informed members, right here on this thread have accepted that a building covered with tarp is of no conclusive proof of anything.
 
100% this. I have been saying this on many threads.

We actually all know who the culprits are too. We all knew the Warns articles would cause them immense heart burn, and I suspected it would be derailed.
that guy raja hindustani...

produced screen long images of ChatGPT, when, countered by creating something which went against him..

he went completely silent, as if, he was never really there!


this is not natural, there is something at play!

this much strangulation is non-healthy for minds!
 
You are right. Warnes messed up here. This is one of the inaccuracies in the article. For example, it also claims IAF struck all 9 sites on 7th - and all using Spice 2000. Both statements not true. Even IAF claimed only 2 sites struck by IAF.
Indians could be lying? 🤔

4 Rafails shot down.
4 Rafails damaged.

If they all released their payloads before being hit, it's possible all Indian attacks were aerial on the 7 May. To hide IAF's losses, they may have decided to credit the Indian Army instead. 🧐
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top