Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions

[maxpane]

022 from what I've heard. They did a program some time ago interviewing her and showing her Rafale

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

View attachment 147356

thats clear now why she is pregnant according to indian media.RIP

 

[Yasser76]

Just show us the aftermath of inside the hangars after the missile strikes, and prove us wrong

They did come on 10th May though, that day Nur Khan and Sargodha were hit by them.

Not very bright are you.

1) PAF has admitted to its losses and damage to an Erieye, was in article
2) Admitted to hits on Sarghoda and Nur Khan

So what exactly are you looking for?

You are basically asking for what is in the public domain.

Now BACK TO TOPIC and stop trying to divert again.

Will ask for 3rd time

BS001, BS021, BS022, and BS027?

 

[kimjongun]

Just show us the aftermath of inside the hangars after the missile strikes, and prove us wrong

They did come on 10th May though, that day Nur Khan and Sargodha were hit by them.

yeah man the plan even landed at nur khan had tea refueled and flew back with gulab jamuns

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Explain me how it is possible for PAF to say "I killed this special Rafale BSXXX" ?
All the Rafale has the same radar signature, and PAF has no access to indian IFF.

That's for Indian Air Farce to figure out.

 

[Hayabusa]

Typical Indians on this thread.

Who makes a mock drill in the middle of a brewing conflict? And which mock drills have real explosions heard? Surely corroborating with Alan Warnes story here. While tarps may not show much. It does point into the direction of Pakistan's narrative.

Each time Indians are asked to show proof that their Rafales are still alive, despite even serial numbers provided, their either talk about our hangars or post an old image.

Let's clear things up here. We have admitted to a damaged Saab already. But if you think we will be parking our F-16s in the hangar during the start of a conflict, it means you are completely wrong. The onus is on you to prove your claim of F-16s damages. Additionally , it is the onus on you to disprove the claim of Rafales being alive after serial number were provided by Alan Warnes.

 

[maxpane]

Bull sh*t 1 Bullsh*t 21 , 22 and 27 are all metal scrapped by pl15

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Get your facts right. IAF resorted to launching A2G munitions from standoff ranges over central IAF bases after "realizing their mistake" ~ CDS Anil Chohan

What do you think CM-400AKG is? Laser guided bomb?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

What do you think CM-400AKG is? Laser guided bomb?

is that a question, suggestion, an axiom or what?!!!!

dont create unnecessary storms!

 

[ThrustVector998]

What do you think CM-400AKG is? Laser guided bomb?

Where should I even begin now

 

[Vkdindian1]

The onus is on you to prove your claim of F-16s damages. Additionally , it is the onus on you to disprove the claim of Rafales being alive after serial number were provided by Alan Warnes.

Both sides need to be held to same yardstick of truth and dare.

India needs to accept the number of aircraft lost. There is no getting away from that.

Same holds good for any claims of attack against ground targets.

The claim by India of destroying F-16 ac is just a claim as the damage on a hangar is just that and nothing more.

Similarly, Pakistan’s claims against Indian targets are hollow, till something credible is provided. Not hazy pictures and videos but something that can be accepted by credible OSINT.

And that is a picture showing the damage clearly.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Both sides need to be held to same yardstick of truth and dare.

India needs to accept the number of aircraft lost. There is no getting away from that.

Same holds good for any claims of attack against ground targets.

The claim by India of destroying F-16 ac is just a claim as the damage on a hangar is just that and nothing more.

Similarly, Pakistan’s claims against Indian targets are hollow, till something credible is provided. Not hazy pictures and videos but something that can be accepted by credible OSINT.

And that is a picture showing the damage clearly.

please stop feeding us, how to think!

you are very clever

why do you feel the need to tell us, what an ordinary man can easily question!

is there anything to hide?!!!

rather, relevant question is:


if you are willing to hide aircraft losses, what else are you hiding?!!

is'nt that a valid question!

 

[CallSignMaverick]

is that a question, suggestion, an axiom or what?!!!!

dont create unnecessary storms!

You know it don't ya?

Where should I even begin now

Please don't...

please stop feeding us, how to think!

you are very clever

why do you feel the need to tell us, what an ordinary man can easily question!

is there anything to hide?!!!

rather, relevant question is:


if you are willing to hide aircraft losses, what else are you hiding?!!

is'nt that a valid question!

We are hiding destroyed airbases invisible to satellites.

 

[rafale]

China purchased four to six S-400 air defense systems. One system equals one air defense battalion (compared to a regiment in Russia).

China's actual test results:
The S-400 air defense system is characterized by its long detection range. However, its radar resolution is relatively poor, and its anti-interference capabilities are relatively weak. In other words, it can detect targets at great distances, but it cannot distinguish their types.

China's HQ-9 series air defense systems have a much shorter detection range than the S-400. However, their radar resolution is stronger, and their anti-interference capabilities are even better. In other words, once detected, they can accurately determine the target's type.

Because China faced significant threats at the time and its own HQ-9 production capacity was insufficient, it purchased the S-400 from Russia for key area air defense. However, actual testing results were unsatisfactory. Subsequently, China deployed all S-400 air defense systems to low-threat areas. The HQ-9 was responsible for air defense in high-threat areas.

Some analysts believe that China was attracted by the interceptor missiles of the S-400 air defense system. ------ Its interceptor missiles are indeed quite good. But its radar and analysis systems are terrible. Russia's electronics and information technology sectors have stagnated for years.

Objectively speaking, the S-400 is stronger than the HQ-9, but the S-400 is prone to misjudgment. The HQ-9 has a much higher cost-effectiveness.

========================================

For Pakistan, purchasing Chinese air defense systems is a better option. If Pakistan wants to research the S-400 system, it can go directly to China. Alternatively, it can communicate directly with its Chinese counterparts.

If Pakistan truly wants to purchase used S-400s, it can try to negotiate with China. After all, the S-400s in China's possession are of little value. We only need to retain one or two for research and as a simulated enemy force.

S-400 is a credible threat, but it is an overhyped threat because Indians use it. Plenty of S-400 taken out in Ukraine-Russia War by drones.

But anything India buys is superior to everything else. So let's not get ahead here.

and you are 100% correct, since the collapse of Soviet Union, infact even in 1980s, Soviets/Russians have been laggin behind west in electronics technology and the software that powers those electronics.

It is funny how many Russian ballistic/air launched ground missiles debris has been found in Ukraine war and examined and almost all of them have a Western origin Micro Processor and DSP chips....because Russia simply can't produce equally powerful electronics.

China is now way ahead in electronics and radars and i am assuming in software too.

So yea, S-400 is an obsolete technology and I have no doubts that Chinese newer AD systems like HQ9B/P/C would be gaining superiority over Russian systems.

But again India is India and as long as they remain this much idiotic, they will continue to blunder in actual tactics and weapons deployment.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

You know it don't ya?

Please don't...


We are hiding destroyed airbases invisible to satellites.

right, the way you were hiding BS 001!

no one was willing to accept that even a single Rafale was shot down for almost first 30 to 40 days!

until CDS Anil Chauhan showed up!


Satellites cannot undo, ones willingness to hide any damage!

when there is a will, there is a way, specially when it is a question of promotions and money (bonuses!)

BTW, we never fired any cruise missiles on your runways!

further, absence of S400 from the whole episode, adds credbility to Pak. narrative (does not make 100% credible but more credible than Ind. one!)

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Yeah, this is where India's size works very well for it and Pakistan's lack of strategic depth hurts us.

Essentially India can safe guard assets in South and East India, relatively well protected from missile attack. Pak does not have that luxury.

Can you tell us which Indian assets in the "South and East India" are actually safe from Pakistan Air Force?