Agnostic Muslim
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
An old adage is appropriate here, ‘the devil is in the details’.And yet Saudi Arabia entered this agreement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An old adage is appropriate here, ‘the devil is in the details’.And yet Saudi Arabia entered this agreement.
I used to but now I don't give a Rat's A$$ about any India, Liberal neutral or Bhaktora, they all are fcuking lunatic and full of hate for Pakistan and its people, this so called Journalist in a ignorant way say look how US put India in same level as Pakistan, BSDK India wale apne aap ko Israel ya America samjhte hai ? plus after Op Sindoor we lost civilians which include women/Children, we showed the world pictures but not a single MC bharti even condemned the deaths of Pakistani kids, those civilian deaths weren't even mentioned so yes I am hard of India and Israel, if they 2 countries are dying of thirst i will not give them a glass of water... Done playing the good or morally high in this world, because no one else is so why should we ?You are being too harsh on that Indian channel. If anything, that channel represents few voices of sanity in India, such as voices like of Pravin Swaheny, which have been saying that it is better for India to make peace with Pakistan. And I actually admire those few Indian channels with the guts to criticize Modi while sitting in India; shows there is still some 'freedom of speech' in India, unlike in Pakistan. And I say that despite being a firm supporter of the current Pakistani setup.
As for Mecca/Medina: Israelis are not stupid enough to do anything to those two cities. Israelis can't even come up with a plan to destroy the Dome of Rock and to replace with their Third Temple (or whatever that maybe). But Israel surely is an expansionist, colonial presence and they are gaining more and more territory and so who knows about the future.
These Indians are the most insecure and henious people alive.
"Saaaar, China Pakistan two front cannot defeat India. India will defeat both!"
"Saaar, KSA Pakistan two front cannot defeat India. India will defeat both! Jai Hind!"
As for India, given that this is the main adversary of Pakistan (Arabs have throughout millennia seen India has a land/people/country/geography where trade/peaceful exchange is the main aim/focus and continue to see it this way today), it will be very interesting to see, if India becomes hostile based on this deal. Their official regime statements openly acknowledge that KSA and Pakistan have always been close and that this deal was in the making for many years (obviously such deals of this nature are not done within 1 week or overnight), but now if India decides to openly be hostile to KSA and by default rest of the GCC and Arab world, it will force Arab regimes to revaluate their mostly economic relationship with India. Quite frankly, from the side of the Arabs, Arab-India relations (economic) are hugely in favour of Arabs. Given the size of India (population and economy) it is hard for anybody (even the likes of China) to ignore it and not take advantage of it economically. From the perspective of Pakistan, that is naturally seen as something uneasy. For Arabs it is nothing more than a financial transaction. Now I will admit, there have not really been any historical hostility between Arabs and what now makes up of India and its 100's of various ethnic groups. In terms of regions of India that we have had a historically close ties to are mostly Kerala, Sri Lanka (not part of India today) and in general South India due to millennia old trade ties and people to people relations. Many Arabs also settled in Sri Lanka, Southern India. Even the ethnic group Malayim or what they are called, claim to be Arab/Kerala mixtures and some DNA tests appear to confirm this.
![]()
Sri Lankan Moors - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Islam in Kerala - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
One of the oldest moques outside of Arabia was built in Southern India due to millennia old Arab-South India trade ties.
![]()
Cheraman Juma Mosque - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The name of that ethnic group in Kerala are Malayalis.
![]()
Malayalis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They are the most frequent ethnic Indian group in KSA and the GCC and they are almost all exclusively Muslim and have an overall good reputation.
It was always strictly business and nothing anti-Pakistan as some here have propagandized due to dislike of Arab regimes or maybe even 500 + million and 20 + Arab countries as a whole. Any way each to their own.
Such fusions are not strange, Arabs did the same in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei (where there are millions of people of Arab (mostly Hijazi and Yemeni) ancestry and similarly in the Sahel and Swahili (Africa) where large ancient groups of Arabs intermarried with local Arabs forming a distinct unique local Muslim/Arab hybrid. A good recent example is the Sultanate of Zanzibar and cities such as Mombasa.
In fact the lingua franca of East Africa (Swahili - itself an Arabic word meaning - coasts), is Swahili whose vocabularly is made up of Arabic words up to 33.33%.
Anyway back to India, if new hostile actions from India aimed at Arabs (KSA in particular) due to this deal being signed (which I fully support personally - wish to see it with more Muslim nations), a new paradigm needs to occur.
Anyway I am trying to be brutally honest here and tell Pakistanis that are unfamiliar with the Arab world and Arabs, how we view India and Indians and from which lens.
In a perfect world, Pakistan and India would at least burry the hatched and have peaceful relations and benefit from each other economically etc. Millions of Pakistanis with ties to India originally and the biggest ethnic group in Pakistan (Punjabis) have their cousins in India next door. Not to mention 200 + million Indian Muslims. Say what you want but unless an Indian is openly anti-Muslim or anti-Arab, I see no reason to hate/see him/her as a hostile person.
Just being honest here.
As for how the average Indian sees Pakistanis and whether or not India has any territorial claims on Pakistan (outside of Kashmir), I have frankly no idea about, but if so, it makes it much more difficult for Pakistan (obviously), to look at India, at how say Arabs, Iranians, Turks, Indonesians and others look at it.
source ? or is this your speculations?Pakistan army to set up 5 missile regiments in Saudia Arabia consisting of Ballastic and Cruise missiles as the part of the Defense agreement signed between the 2 countries. A joint Air defense mechanism will also be eatablished with satelite assisted systems and A.D Missiles.
The pact means s/-/it, since neither Israel will need to annhilate KSA, neither will Indians invade Pakistan anytime soon. Even if hostilities arise, in the 'operational' domain,as expected in Pakistan India case, Arabs will not join, not through assets or money.
Same way how I look at the few remaining relatively sane Israelis even though it becomes ever more increasingly difficult to respect anything about them, let alone encounter sane ones. But eventually some compromise or solution needs to be found, not out of love, but for the sake of peace, stability and future generations. It becomes even more absurd, from the Arab perspective at least, when 20% of the Israelis are Arab Palestinians and Bedouins and 2/3 of the remaining 80% Israeli Jews are Arab Jews whose parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents once roamed Arab countries from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, KSA, Yemen, Syria, Iraq etc.personally, I respect educated Indians if they are balanced (if I find any!)
I am not too sure about that. The current right wing coalition is highly religious and fundamentalist; a far cry from the secular liberal era of Rabin, Shimon Peres, and Ben Gurion. The world is viewed by an ancient lens of exceptionalism based on God's "choice" of a peopleAs for Mecca/Medina: Israelis are not stupid enough to do anything to those two cities. Israelis can't even come up with a plan to destroy the Dome of Rock and to replace with their Third Temple (or whatever that maybe).
Kuglemaaan is a number 1 d*ll*...He is a pro Indian analyst.
Glad to see you after a long time and even better to read your invaluable input on this.As for India, given that this is the main adversary of Pakistan (Arabs have throughout millennia seen India has a land/people/country/geography where trade/peaceful exchange is the main aim/focus and continue to see it this way today), it will be very interesting to see, if India becomes hostile based on this deal. Their official regime statements openly acknowledge that KSA and Pakistan have always been close and that this deal was in the making for many years (obviously such deals of this nature are not done within 1 week or overnight), but now if India decides to openly be hostile to KSA and by default rest of the GCC and Arab world, it will force Arab regimes to revaluate their mostly economic relationship with India. Quite frankly, from the side of the Arabs, Arab-India relations (economic) are hugely in favour of Arabs. Given the size of India (population and economy) it is hard for anybody (even the likes of China) to ignore it and not take advantage of it economically. From the perspective of Pakistan, that is naturally seen as something uneasy. For Arabs it is nothing more than a financial transaction. Now I will admit, there have not really been any historical hostility between Arabs and what now makes up of India and its 100's of various ethnic groups. In terms of regions of India that we have had a historically close ties to are mostly Kerala, Sri Lanka (not part of India today) and in general South India due to millennia old trade ties and people to people relations. Many Arabs also settled in Sri Lanka, Southern India. Even the ethnic group Malayim or what they are called, claim to be Arab/Kerala mixtures and some DNA tests appear to confirm this.
![]()
Sri Lankan Moors - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Islam in Kerala - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
One of the oldest moques outside of Arabia was built in Southern India due to millennia old Arab-South India trade ties.
![]()
Cheraman Juma Mosque - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The name of that ethnic group in Kerala are Malayalis.
![]()
Malayalis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They are the most frequent ethnic Indian group in KSA and the GCC and they are almost all exclusively Muslim and have an overall good reputation.
It was always strictly business and nothing anti-Pakistan as some here have propagandized due to dislike of Arab regimes or maybe even 500 + million and 20 + Arab countries as a whole. Any way each to their own.
Such fusions are not strange, Arabs did the same in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei (where there are millions of people of Arab (mostly Hijazi and Yemeni) ancestry and similarly in the Sahel and Swahili (Africa) where large ancient groups of Arabs intermarried with local Africans forming a distinct unique local Muslim/Arab hybrid. A good recent example is the Sultanate of Zanzibar and cities such as Mombasa.
In fact the lingua franca of East Africa (Swahili - itself an Arabic word meaning - coasts), is Swahili whose vocabularly is made up of Arabic words up to 33.33%.
Anyway back to India, if new hostile actions from India aimed at Arabs (KSA in particular) due to this deal being signed (which I fully support personally - wish to see it with more Muslim nations), a new paradigm needs to occur.
Anyway I am trying to be brutally honest here and tell Pakistanis that are unfamiliar with the Arab world and Arabs, how we view India and Indians and from which lens.
In a perfect world, Pakistan and India would at least burry the hatched and have peaceful relations and benefit from each other economically etc. Millions of Pakistanis with ties to India originally and the biggest ethnic group in Pakistan (Punjabis) have their cousins in India next door. Not to mention 200 + million Indian Muslims. Say what you want but unless an Indian is openly anti-Muslim or anti-Arab, I see no reason to hate/see him/her as a hostile person.
Just being honest here.
As for how the average Indian sees Pakistanis and whether or not India has any territorial claims on Pakistan (outside of Kashmir), I have frankly no idea about, but if so, it makes it much more difficult for Pakistan (obviously), to look at India, at how say Arabs, Iranians, Turks, Indonesians and others look at it.
But if the Kashmir problem is solved in a satisfactory manner and the rabid anti-Muslim sentiments of many Indian Hindus are controlled and some kind of reconciliation is achieved, I see it far easier for Pakistan and India to burry the hatched (at least accept each others existence) than say Palestinians and Israelis burying the hatchet.
I am not too sure about that. The current right wing coalition is highly religious and fundamentalist; a far cry from the secular liberal era of Rabin, Shimon Peres, and Ben Gurion. The world is viewed by an ancient lens of exceptionalism based on God's "choice" of a people
Theoretically Jews do have a claim to the Kaaba in Mecca since it was Ishmael's Temple which was built for Ishmael by Abraham when he briefly visited the area years after Ishmael and Hagar had left . Also Madina, earlier known as Yathrib was a Jewish majority city,
So it is not inconceivable that as the Arab lands are conquered one by one in the greatest military adventure since David Mecca and Medina will in time too be captured and the mosques demolished.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.