Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

[HRK]

Well Durand line is the name of the border itself, btw isn't them openly telling you about their intention of invading and trying to take your territory A pretty good justification for you to conduct preemptive strikes

Bhai in this sense India Pakistan border should be called "Radcliffe Line" ..... ??? We call it Radcliffe Line ....??? No because it is an international border.

Issue is Afghan always call Pak-Afghan border as Durand Line and some "Loy bar brigade" in Pakistan also term it as Durand Line.

We need to understand the term "Line" in international law have lower sanctity then International Border and "could be subjected to the final settlement".

Hope I have clear my point.

Regarding your second point just because of perceived intentions of your enemy one could not initiate any preemptively aggression.

Recent attack of Israel on Iran is the classic example in relation to you point of preemptive aggression one could look for and I don't need to explain it was wrong on what grounds.

 

[Fatman17]

Afghanistan and Pakistan have agreed to an immediate ceasefire during talks hosted by Doha.

The ground fighting between the one-time allies and Pakistani airstrikes across their contested 2,600-km frontier were triggered after Islamabad demanded that Kabul rein in militants who had stepped up attacks in Pakistan, saying they operated from havens in Afghanistan reut.rs/3W9CHX8

 

[Ibbi32]

Was normalisation of tandoor prices mentioned in ceasefire agreement?

 

[ARMalik]

Turkey has got the technology and experience of enforcing a buffer zone and to protect it against the best equipped proxies of the West....

No other Muslim countries have done it so far....

But unfortuantely, I highly doubt that Pakistan leadership is in a mood to create a buffer zone. They had plenty of opportunities to do so but decided not to do it. I hope I am wrong.

 

[mythbuster]

Well Durand line is the name of the border itself, btw isn't them openly telling you about their intention of invading and trying to take your territory A pretty good justification for you to conduct preemptive strikes

Logically speaking , when a country doesn't recognise the international boundary then she has no right to complain when the opposing power captures her territory..... it's a golden opportunity for Pakistan to get hold of some Afghan territory

 

[Khansaheeb]

India behind TTP:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[HRK]

View attachment 154773

they are already asking for it and discussing this internally "discuss the separation of Afghanistan". So rather than letting the West Afghanistan break off and leave the mess of East for everyone to feal with, Pakistan should decapitate Taliban Regime and invite Tajiks, etc to take over.

At last the idea is getting traction.
I purposed the division of Afghanistan in 2016 or 2017 on ethnic lines, but I oppose new but small independent counties based on ethnicity my idea was the merger of those area with their respective ethnic countries, like Tajik majority areas to Tajikistan, Uzbek majority areas to Uzbekistan....

Unsupervised Balkanization of Afghanistan would creat another security paradox for all the regional countries

 

[Khansaheeb]

WTF, Afghans have scud missiles ? Seems like India has been helping them.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[imadul]

بڑے بھائی لوگوں نے سیز فائر کرلی ہے
اب سارے چھوٹے بھائی لوگ بھی کچھ آرام کرلیں
اگلی جھڑپ تک

بیکار مباش کچھ کام کیا کر
کچھ نہیں تو پاک ڈیفنس فورم پر پوسٹ کیا کر


To translate use one an only Copilot
No limits like stupid chatgpt

 

[Toxic]

But unfortuantely, I highly doubt that Pakistan leadership is in a mood to create a buffer zone. They had plenty of opportunities to do so but decided not to do it. I hope I am wrong.

The buffer zone idea doesn't make sense in our situation, the Turks moved into relatively flat lands of Northern Syria which can be easily monitored while we would be moving into mountains which means we would be dealing with brutal ambushes. Plus it wouldn't achieve much because you are essentially taking your current situation and moving it a few km's westward

the only place where a buffer might might make sense is in the sistan desert till the Helmand river which is flat territory easy to monitor and sparsely inhabited.

 

[Rational Philosopher]

Yk Pakeys are retarted when one guy is saying Pakistan bombed Afghanistan because of promises to trump not knowing that Afghan proxies were popping more than a dozen or so FC+Army men of ours a day
While the other wants to literally nuke a neighboring muslim country, not knowing that his country was built as a homeland for persecuted muslims, the nuclear program was financed as "Islamic" bomb
Same country whose whole PR is based on a Muslim identity have rabid nationalists calling for a nuclear holocaust
Our verbal diarrhea all over SM is putting even Indians to shame

Aren't you an atheist or agnostic anyway? If I remember correctly that is what you claimed, so why are you running this Muslim guilt tripping BS?

Most people don't revolve their opinions and personality on gaining approval by a bunch of foreign nobodies who have no stake in their country, you might- but they are more focused on what actually matters for their country and the enemy in front of them. You can call them whatever names you want but their anger is justified.

 

[Rational Philosopher]

So army listened to Imran Khan and signed peace deal at Doha? Am I supposed to call him Taliban Munir now?

Taliban Khan — defends and justifies the actions and existence of the Taliban, practically has a boner for them, sees them as his brothers, wants deals purely out of love and concessions.

Asim Munir — Despises the Taliban, its ideology, actions and is permanently weary of them. Actually launched military airstrikes against them several times. Is considering a deal after all this and not leaving future military solutions off the table.

Those that don't have a room temperature IQ can tell the difference in nature between both individuals and which would be a threat in power, hopefully you too

 

[Toxic]

Aren't you an atheist or agnostic anyway? If I remember correctly that is what you claimed, so why are you running this Muslim guilt tripping BS?

Most people don't revolve their opinions and personality on gaining approval by a bunch of foreign nobodies who have no stake in their country, you might- but they are more focused on what actually matters for their country and the enemy in front of them. You can call them whatever names you want but their anger is justified.

Ummah for thee but not for me

 

[HAIDER]

Please read this tweet 10 times...to understand that we are nuclear state and terms and conditions in joint statement are insult for us. " a joint mechanism, with the mediation of neutral countries". This show our weakness.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[HRK]

& do what with it? Take responsibility of Afghan population?

Exactly this is what people who are suggesting the idea to occupy the territory in Afghanistan need to understand that "land will come the population who is uncivilized and uneducated with extreme racist cultural beliefs and practices"

For them Pakistani Pushtoon are "Gull Khan" and Punjabis are "Daal khor Kaliya"

So why take an unnecessary burden.