I find the IAF Chief’s claim about Operation Sindoor hard to accept: Pravin Sawhney

[Dark-Lord]

Over 34 such installations were hit and even S-400 was hit and rendered nonfunctional by JF-17 Thunders.

If there is an iota of truth in your posts, how much not single satellite pic has emerged of any damage of India, which is opposite of Indian strikes in Pakistan

 

[Signalian]

8 x Indian politicians died in 2025 and now new ones will be selected in the november 2025 elections. But 8 deaths in 2025, with the latest death a few days ago seems suspicious.

2025 elections in India - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Ops Sindoor (Part 2) is expected before Nov 2025 elections ?

 

[kimjongun]

If there is an iota of truth in your posts, how much not single satellite pic has emerged of any damage of India, which is opposite of Indian strikes in Pakistan

We on this forum have said that the pakistan retaliotory sirkes against indian bases was ver minimal..the claims can be for fanboys..the damage that happened was very minimal tbh...the reason fo that is the using very low amount of weapons...yiha,fatah1,cm400akg...while india used its whole airlaunched and ground launched inventory...the accuracy of mlrs wasnt that good either..however there is concret proof of it hitting a forwardl post in udhampur airbase killing an officer and injuring many :
Sergeant mog

Lost his arm


there were runway damage too on indian bases as said by nytimes but it was very minimal too do something
Satelite imagerof bases from both sides
However,Nukta pakistan had said that there were hollow places in the imagery provided by ny times of the UDHAMPUR airbase following are the points:

Nukta Pakistan’s Core Criticisms of NYT's Article (May 14, 2025):​

1. Misleading Use of Satellite Imagery Timing​

• NYT claimed no significant damage at India’s Udhampur Air Base after Pakistani airstrikes.
• Nukta reveals that the satellite image NYT used was taken after two full days of repairs at the base.
• Open-source satellite images from May 10–12 show clear evidence of damage that visibly reduced by May 13, and was completely repaired by May 16.

Key Point: NYT used post-repair imagery to downplay the actual damage caused.

2. Selective Focus / Asymmetrical Analysis

• NYT provided high-definition images of all four Pakistani air bases hit by India, but only one Indian air base (Udhampur) was reviewed.
• Even then, no high-res image was used for the Indian target.

Nukta’s Argument: The story is visibly biased, giving more visual weight & scrutiny to Pakistani sites than to Indian ones.

3. Contradiction in Language

• For Sarghodha Air Base (Pakistan), NYT noted: "crater on runway"
• But for Udhampur (India), they said: “no significant damage” despite damage clearly visible in earlier images.

Critique: The use of softer language for Indian damage and stronger terms for Pakistani sites reflects narrative bias, despite visual evidence suggesting otherwise.

4. Accusation of Media Misrepresentation

• Nukta claims the NYT report was used internationally to undermine Pakistan’s strike capability, when actual damage & repairs indicate otherwise.
• Questions whether this kind of selective international reporting during a high-stakes military conflict is responsible journalism or geopolitical narrative-shaping.

 

[Master Chief]

Sure, so now it's 7.

Trump believes five fighter jets were shot down in India-Pakistan conflict

US president, who has claimed credit for the truce in May, says planes were being shot out of the air.

www.aljazeera.com

No points for guessing who his source is

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

"Known thing", "we are better trained", "we log more flying hours", "IAF is inferior (except 1971 obv)".

Are you actually this stupid?

When data is verified, the kill counter slowly rolls up.

Sometimes, it may roll the other way, as in the case of verifying average Indian IQ.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

We on this forum have said that the pakistan retaliotory sirkes against indian bases was ver minimal..the claims can be for fanboys..the damage that happened was very minimal tbh...the reason fo that is the using very low amount of weapons...yiha,fatah1,cm400akg...while india used its whole airlaunched and ground launched inventory...the accuracy of mlrs wasnt that good either..however there is concret proof of it hitting a forwardl post in udhampur airbase killing an officer and injuring many :
Sergeant mog
View attachment 154896
Lost his arm
View attachment 154893
View attachment 154894
there were runway damage too on indian bases as said by nytimes but it was very minimal too do something
Satelite imagerof bases from both sides
However,Nukta pakistan had said that there were hollow places in the imagery provided by ny times of the UDHAMPUR airbase following are the points:

Nukta Pakistan’s Core Criticisms of NYT's Article (May 14, 2025):​

1. Misleading Use of Satellite Imagery Timing​

• NYT claimed no significant damage at India’s Udhampur Air Base after Pakistani airstrikes.
• Nukta reveals that the satellite image NYT used was taken after two full days of repairs at the base.
• Open-source satellite images from May 10–12 show clear evidence of damage that visibly reduced by May 13, and was completely repaired by May 16.

Key Point: NYT used post-repair imagery to downplay the actual damage caused.

2. Selective Focus / Asymmetrical Analysis

• NYT provided high-definition images of all four Pakistani air bases hit by India, but only one Indian air base (Udhampur) was reviewed.
• Even then, no high-res image was used for the Indian target.

Nukta’s Argument: The story is visibly biased, giving more visual weight & scrutiny to Pakistani sites than to Indian ones.

3. Contradiction in Language

• For Sarghodha Air Base (Pakistan), NYT noted: "crater on runway"
• But for Udhampur (India), they said: “no significant damage” despite damage clearly visible in earlier images.

Critique: The use of softer language for Indian damage and stronger terms for Pakistani sites reflects narrative bias, despite visual evidence suggesting otherwise.

4. Accusation of Media Misrepresentation

• Nukta claims the NYT report was used internationally to undermine Pakistan’s strike capability, when actual damage & repairs indicate otherwise.
• Questions whether this kind of selective international reporting during a high-stakes military conflict is responsible journalism or geopolitical narrative-shaping.

It was not a missile but a loitering munition as mentioned by DGAO Aurangzeb himself. Both of them were medical personnel. I won't call that "significant damage".

Soldier killed guarding air base in J-K's Udhampur

A soldier was killed by debris from a Pakistani drone intercepted by Indian Air Defence at Udhampur air base in Jammu and Kashmir. The incident occurred before a ceasefire announcement following heightened combat activities after India's retaliatory missile strike on terror infrastructure...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Are you actually this stupid?

When data is verified, the kill counter slowly rolls up.

Sometimes, it may roll the other way, as in the case of verifying average Indian IQ.

Data is verified on their side, they are free to share it. Otherwise it has the same value as IAF's claims of S-400 kills of PAF aircraft.

As far as "average IQ" goes, the state of affairs in both countries is very well a testament to the numbers.

Microsoft Pakistan shuts down operations after 25 years: Why is tech giant leaving the country? | The Express Tribune

Microsoft has ended its operations in Pakistan after 25 years, citing global restructuring. The tech firm says local partners will continue delivery.

tribune.com.pk

Google to build a $15bn AI data hub in India

This is Google’s biggest investment outside the US , the firm's top executive says.

www.bbc.com

 

[Dark-Lord]

concret proof of it hitting a forwardl post in udhampur airbase killing an officer and injuring many

Only one medical assistant was killed and one injured.

NYT claimed no significant damage at India’s Udhampur Air Base after Pakistani airstrikes.

Detresfa himself debunked the satellite pic claiming to show runway damage at Udhampur

Open-source satellite images from May 10–12 show clear evidence of damage that visibly reduced by May 13, and was completely repaired by May 16.

Major damages can't be repaired in 2 or 3 days
For example traces of damage were still visible at Sargodha in July let alone Nur khan, Sahbaz and Bholari.

 

[Master Chief]

Many of our dear Hindustani barhadari are visibly emotional this week over the severe neutering of their vanguard legions in Afghanistan, hence they seem to be re-obsessing over matters pertaining to the May conflict, which Pakistanis have now moved on from.

 

[kimjongun]

It was not a missile but a loitering munition as mentioned by DGAO Aurangzeb himself. Both of them were medical personnel. I won't call that "significant damage".

Soldier killed guarding air base in J-K's Udhampur

A soldier was killed by debris from a Pakistani drone intercepted by Indian Air Defence at Udhampur air base in Jammu and Kashmir. The incident occurred before a ceasefire announcement following heightened combat activities after India's retaliatory missile strike on terror infrastructure...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Data is verified on their side, they are free to share it. Otherwise it has the same value as IAF's claims of S-400 kills of PAF aircraft.

As far as "average IQ" goes, the state of affairs in both countries is very well a testament to the numbers.

Microsoft Pakistan shuts down operations after 25 years: Why is tech giant leaving the country? | The Express Tribune

Microsoft has ended its operations in Pakistan after 25 years, citing global restructuring. The tech firm says local partners will continue delivery.

tribune.com.pk

Google to build a $15bn AI data hub in India

This is Google’s biggest investment outside the US , the firm's top executive says.

www.bbc.com

Thats why is said in my post as MINIMAL DAMAGE.
but can you comprehend that a guy can be killed by falling debris of a yiha 3? after it was intercepted??? also in the sma post a guy lost his arm...yiha are slow moving and afters its interception it cant be that powerfull to kill a guy and injured a man...either it was not intercepted or it was a missile..the article said the guy still has shrapnel in his arm...

 

[kimjongun]

Only one medical assistant was killed and one injured.




Detresfa himself debunked the satellite pic claiming to show runway damage at Udhampur



Major damages can't be repaired in 2 or 3 days
For example traces of damage were still visible at Sargodha in July let alone Nur khan, Sahbaz and Bholari.

Im saying minimal damage lol..the claims are from nukta...i wish these forums had their own maxar or planet labs memberships

 

[CallSignMaverick]

but can you comprehend that a guy can be killed by falling debris of a yiha 3? after it was intercepted???

1. All of this is media chatter, they don't have any evidence or info beyond what their sources tell them.

2. Yes I too wonder how can a debris cause shrapnel damage unless the "debris" was the whole drone with one of it's wing damaged/ripped off due to anti aircraft gun fire.

 

[kimjongun]

1. All of this is media chatter, they don't have any evidence or info beyond what their sources tell them.

2. Yes I too wonder how can a debris cause shrapnel damage unless the "debris" was the whole drone with one of it's wing damaged/ripped off due to anti aircraft gun fire.

IMO the depris claim was probably to make the claim of 100 percent interception rate more stronger and to make the public not question the army that much..cuz you dont spend 35 days in the hospital after some "depris"hits you...but its AD , loophole are everywhere in it

 

[CallSignMaverick]

IMO the depris claim was probably to make the claim of 100 percent interception rate more stronger and to make the public not question the army that much..cuz you dont spend 35 days in the hospital after some "depris"hits you...but its AD , loophole are everywhere in it

Nah I think the Yiha was damaged after hit but the warhead was functional. Yiha is pretty slow so that's probable. On paper it will be a debris but it was still an armed munition. Because PAF won't be sending a LM on a medical post instead of something valuable.

 

[kimjongun]

Nah I think the Yiha was damaged after hit but the warhead was functional. Yiha is pretty slow so that's probable. On paper it will be a debris but it was still an armed munition. Because PAF won't be sending a LM on a medical post instead of something valuable.

Yeah man , there could be a possibility of the medical post claim being false..you never know countries go a long route to hide what had been hit and what not...hitting a medical post doesnt make sense and the officers/sergents dont look like medical staff either..you never know

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Yeah man , there could be a possibility of the medical post claim being false..you never know countries go a long route to hide what had been hit and what not...hitting a medical post doesnt make sense and the officers/sergents dont look like medical staff either..you never know

If it was false, then DGAO would've proudly presented the video of successful hit on anything critical

Most likely the drone got close, one of it's wings got hit by an L70 airburst round and the drone/debris with warhead intact fell on the place where the medic post and both of them unfortunately were.

 

[kimjongun]

If it was false, then DGAO would've proudly presented the video of successful hit on anything critical

Most likely the drone got close, one of it's wings got hit by an L70 airburst round and the drone/debris with warhead intact fell on the place where the medic post and both of them unfortunately were.

Its just speculations...a yiha 3 isnt that stable in the air after being hit by an airbust round...you cant get killed by its falling debris or loose your hand. either there were no interceptions of it and it fell succesfully at the target or it was a missile...
either way we can conclude that a guy got KIA while other guy lost his arm.
lets wait for some miracle so we could get more info about these battles(probably we wont) until then lets just agree to disagree.