India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales

[r3alist]

I see the thread has become infested with off-topic posts.

No proof beyond 4 jets and even if one to give benefit of the doubt and say its 7-0, no proof that 4 were rafales.

Continue to troll, diss, whatever you like/love...

How do you end up losing 2 Rafales lol

What's your opinion on this, let's talk about what we all agree on... losing Rafales

Your offensive air warfare, at your choice of time, Pakistan beats the superpower, takes down it's best fighter....

 

[hasssanali8998]

terrorist strongholds taken out.

brother u bombed avg mosques in cites , and killed a few civilians 2 people in Bahawalpur if i Remember correctly .
atp just say every mosques is a terrorist stronghold

 

[hasssanali8998]

In what world does PAF saying AWACS is damaged and it can be repaired even though 5 airmen lost lives stand true

different airbases .

5-6 planes

no proof .

7-0

was 6 jets plus uav from day one , and when trump kept on saying 7 jets shot down you iaf chief came 3 months later and said s400 shot down 7 jets from 300 kms

 

[TAC]

I see the thread has become infested with off-topic posts.

No proof beyond 4 jets and even if one to give benefit of the doubt and say its 7-0, no proof that 4 were rafales.

Continue to troll, diss, whatever you like/love...

Ok you win, India lost 4-7 of its best jets including at least 1 but upto 4 Ra-fails
Compared to Pakistan losing none —- but India ‘won’, and won so convincingly that your AC is saying that the world should learn from India. Makes perfect sense to me

 

[r3alist]

Imagine the only losses were 2 Rafales.


That becomes harder for the iaf to explain, maybe?

 

[Yasser76]

Ok you win, India lost 4-7 of its best jets including at least 1 but upto 4 Ra-fails
Compared to Pakistan losing none —- but India ‘won’, and won so convincingly that your AC is saying that the world should learn from India. Makes perfect sense to me

Yup, CAS in Romania where their AF praised our performance in May and seeking learnings. Guy has had more meetings with Air Force heads from other countries on last 6 months then he had in previous 3 years.

Funny how all the other air forces want to learn from an AF that lost 12 jets to S-400.....

 

[hasssanali8998]

Yup, CAS in Romania where their AF praised our performance in May and seeking learnings. Guy has had more meetings with Air Force heads from other countries on last 6 months then he had in previous 3 years.

Funny how all the other air forces want to learn from an AF that lost 12 jets to S-400.....

18 jf17 too yaar dont forget about them

 

[TAC]

brother u bombed avg mosques in cites , and killed a few civilians 2 people in Bahawalpur if i Remember correctly .
atp just say every mosques is a terrorist stronghold

If Modi via Godi media tells him those were terrorist training centres with 100’s of fully trained and armed terrorists in them minutes away from crossing the border, the likes of him will believe it, nothing you or anyone else can do about it. Pakistani authorities took international media to these sites the very next morning to see the facts for themselves but facts don’t mean anything to this nation. Genuinely don’t know if they are so thick that they happily gobble up any BS fed to them by Modi for his personal political gains, or they just find the truth too painful to face upto, so happier believing what they know are lies.

 

[samsite84]

How do you end up losing 2 Rafales lol

What's your opinion on this, let's talk about what we all agree on... losing Rafales

Your offensive air warfare, at your choice of time, Pakistan beats the superpower, takes down it's best fighter....

Okay. So a more worthy discussion is say India lost 4 jets. How does Indian population at large (and more personally I) take it.

Frankly, with 90%+ Indians that are in my sphere (and we all live in a bubble of ours) will take 4 jet loses any day to what IAF was able to accomplish deep inside Pakistan territory. People are fed up of Pahalgam type actions where perpetrators were asking religion before executing (ISIS style). Something had to be done and was done and India will take those losses in its stride, learn better, train better and will be out again if something untoward were to happen.

That's the long and short of it. There is a price to be paid for any terrorist action that targets civilians in India - that is how most Indians see it. And if we have to "pay" a price of a few jets, thats more than OK.

 

[Yasser76]

Okay. So a more worthy discussion is say India lost 4 jets. How does Indian population at large (and more personally I) take it.

Frankly, with 90%+ Indians that are in my sphere (and we all live in a bubble of ours) will take 4 jet loses any day to what IAF was able to accomplish deep inside Pakistan territory. People are fed up of Pahalgam type actions where perpetrators were asking religion before executing (ISIS style). Something had to be done and was done and India will take those losses in its stride, learn better, train better and will be out again if something untoward were to happen.

That's the long and short of it. There is a price to be paid for any terrorist action that targets civilians in India - that is how most Indians see it. And if we have to "pay" a price of a few jets, thats more than OK.

Again, you start relevant and go off topic in a tempt to bait. Post reported (again).

@mods, can we now just thread ban this clown?> Obvious what he is doing here, cannot live with the losses so ranting about Pakistani "terrorists"

 

[hasssanali8998]

that is how most Indians see it. And if we have to "pay" a price of a few jets, thats more than OK.

don't forget about international humiliation , also losing the position of being the first line of defense against China that west gave you

 

[TAC]

Okay. So a more worthy discussion is say India lost 4 jets. How does Indian population at large (and more personally I) take it.

Frankly, with 90%+ Indians that are in my sphere (and we all live in a bubble of ours) will take 4 jet loses any day to what IAF was able to accomplish deep inside Pakistan territory. People are fed up of Pahalgam type actions where perpetrators were asking religion before executing (ISIS style). Something had to be done and was done and India will take those losses in its stride, learn better, train better and will be out again if something untoward were to happen.

That's the long and short of it. There is a price to be paid for any terrorist action that targets civilians in India - that is how most Indians see it. And if we have to "pay" a price of a few jets, thats more than OK.

You sound like an ardent Godi media fan. ‘What IAF was able to accomplish deep inside Pakistan’??!! err… they fired stand off weapons from their own territory , PAF couldn’t engage them until those weapons were fired, when PAF did engage them, they fell all over NW India like swatted flies with your pathetic officials scrambling to stop your own media reporting the humiliation - & that’s what IAF ‘accomplished’???
You keep going on about ‘proof’ - care to share any that proves that anyone other that who Pakistan disclosed was killed at the sites you targeted? A lot of women & children no? Any proof that anyone in Pakistan was involved in the terror attack? O sorry you launched ‘Sindoor’ before the investigation was complete didn’t you? You must be so proud.

 

[samsite84]

Again, you start relevant and go off topic in a tempt to bait. Post reported (again).

@mods, can we now just thread ban this clown?> Obvious what he is doing here, cannot live with the losses so ranting about Pakistani "terrorists"

@Fatman17 @RescueRanger @Musings mods, how is replying to a direct question (which is worth discussing among the muck of troll and derogatory posts) is an infraction while folks such as the one quoted above and the cabal are given freedom of "expression"

In any case, there are 10 posts/reactions, most of them troll in nature (don't offer any insights), in response to anything that a member with counter-view will post. Have no issues if you thread ban - would hope such actions are take more equitably (if not equally)

 

[Yasser76]

You sound like an ardent Godi media fan. ‘What IAF was able to accomplish deep inside Pakistan’??!! err… they fired stand off weapons from their own territory , PAF couldn’t engage them until those weapons were fired, when PAF did engage them, they fell all over NW India like swatted flies with your pathetic officials scrambling to stop your own media reporting the humiliation - & that’s what IAF ‘accomplished’???
You keep going on about ‘proof’ - care to share any that proves that anyone other that who Pakistan disclosed was killed at the sites you targeted? A lot of women & children no? Any proof that anyone in Pakistan was involved in the terror attack? O sorry you launched ‘Sindoor’ before the investigation was complete didn’t you? You must be so proud.

Do not take his bait and let thread get derailed, he was losing argument so wants to shift things away from the 7 aircraft downed. Classic tactic

 

[RescueRanger]

@Fatman17 @RescueRanger @Musings mods, how is replying to a direct question (which is worth discussing among the muck of troll and derogatory posts) is an infraction while folks such as the one quoted above and the cabal are given freedom of "expression"

In any case, there are 10 posts/reactions, most of them troll in nature (don't offer any insights), in response to anything that a member with counter-view will post. Have no issues if you thread ban - would hope such actions are take more equitably (if not equally)

Guys please stop tagging mods and asking for bans. Be big boys and talk it out.