Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
JF-17s have been deployed in the previous airstrikes so idk what you are trying to say? F-16 shouldn't be used in airstrikes?
JFT were used in which strikes ?

Sniper Pod for PAF F-16s was acquired for A2G as well as A2A missions. Then there were JDAM kits and Mark 82 & 84 bombs. Its a great combo for precision strike.

Sniper pod for precision targeting. JDAM kit for guidance on Mark 82 (500 lb) or Mark 84 (2000 lb) bombs.
 
JFT were used in which strikes ?

Sniper Pod for PAF F-16s was acquired for A2G as well as A2A missions. Then there were JDAM kits and Mark 82 & 84 bombs. Its a great combo for precision strike.

Sniper pod for precision targeting. JDAM kit for guidance on Mark 82 (500 lb) or Mark 84 (2000 lb) bombs.
They were used in 2024 airstrikes, what exactly are you trying to say lmao? JFT can't be used in airstrikes?
 
They were used in 2024 airstrikes, what exactly are you trying to say lmao? JFT can't be used in airstrikes?
1. why weren't JFTs used in Afghanistan strike ?
2. what weapon was JFT carrying and fired in Iran strikes ?
 
1. why weren't JFTs used in Afghanistan strike ?
2. what weapon was JFT carrying and fired in Iran strikes ?
1. They probably were, f-16s were only used on the initial airstrike in Kabul, all the subsequent airstrikes were carried out by drones like the Akinci and WL-2 and other aircraft probably JF-17 among them.

2. AZB REK glide bombs
 
1. They probably were, f-16s were only used on the initial airstrike in Kabul, all the subsequent airstrikes were carried out by drones like the Akinci and WL-2 and other aircraft probably JF-17 among them.

2. AZB REK glide bombs
so PAF is using JFT for long range strikes. Azb REK against targets in Iran and CM-400 against S400 Radar in India.
 
Similar for Mirage-V, they are deployed for long range night time strike using H-2 and H-4 SOWs.

Mirage-III as ADA fighter with Grifo Radar and AIM-9 missiles, although classified as multirole but upgraded for air combat. F-7 PG in the same league with limited strike capability.

That makes F-16 as the best candidate for precision strikes with minimal collateral.
 
which missiles to Sikhs and which missiles to Taliban ?

Well Indians claimed that Pakistan provided anti-tank missiles to Sikhs. Obviously Indians are just making a fake case / a fake narrative where in future they will claim that since Pakistan provided missiles to Sikhs, India provided SAMs to Taliban.
 
so PAF is using JFT for long range strikes. Azb REK against targets in Iran and CM-400 against S400 Radar in India.
Do you understand what the word "Multirole" means? They carried out hundreds of airstrikes in the 2010s in support of military operations, they are better suited for longer range airstrikes and SEAD compared to the f-16s since they can carry cruise missiles and Long range Glide bombs and anti radiation missiles while the longest range A To G weaponry Pakistani F-16s have access to is Jdams with a 28km range
 
Last edited:
Well Indians claimed that Pakistan provided anti-tank missiles to Sikhs. Obviously Indians are just making a fake case / a fake narrative where in future they will claim that since Pakistan provided missiles to Sikhs, India provided SAMs to Taliban.
If that ATGM is Green Arrow, then it requires a tripod or a stable platform and training in optical wire guided missiles. If its Alcotan-100, then its unguided, effective in short range combat and is man portable like RPGs.
 
A bit of guess work. PA protects Mecca and Medina shareef, where as Americans protect the rest of KSA.
Does it ? There were no Pakistani troops visible when I went for Umra
PA protects holy cities as PA is Muslim Army therefore can be deployed freely at holy sites and can thwart Isarelis if Israelis attempt to blackmail/pressurize KSA militarily
The recent Afghan-Pakistan conflict has proved one thing Saudi Arabia will say or do nothing to help Pakistan in it's conflict with India, Iran, or Afghanistan. A remote possibility but if Saudi Arabia ever does suffer an Israeli or Iranian missile strike like Qatar, Pakistan will only make a "diplomatic " statement of protest and do nothing.

A hypothetical "war gamed " scenario on a potential attack on the Two Holy Mosques.

IF they choose to, the Israelis (and also Indians) will hit Mecca and Medina with ballistic missile or drone strikes. Saudi Arabia's feeble defense is a lone 90's era PAC 3 Patriot battery located in Mecca, which can easily be destroyed by a mass drone strike, or a hypersonic anti-radiation missile.
What exactly the Pakistani Army will do to protect the "Two Holy Places" is unclear. Pakistan itself is deficient in defense against ballistic or supersonic cruise missiles given the fact that important Pakistani air bases were hit by India using massed Brahmos attacks. Pakistan's answer to India was retaliation and escalation, which ultimately resulted in US intervention and a ceasefire.
There is no way Saudi Arabia can retaliate against a potential Israeli attack on Mecca or Medina . Saudi Arabia like Qatar will make a lot of noise and do nothing. Likewise, IF Israel damages Mecca and Medina with missile strikes, it is highly unlikely that Pakistan will start a missile exchange with Israel on behalf of Saudi Arabia. Pakistan will however "diplomatically " protest by a foreign ministry statement condemning the strike.

The only plausible scenario for a direct Pakista-Israel clash, is an attempted retaliation by Pakistan, in case it's nuclear assets are destroyed in a joint Indian-Israeli airstrike. Both India and Israel have war-gamed this scenario, and with the Shaheen missiles operating at extreme range, all will be shot down by Israeli missile defenses. However, even if it is for optics, Pakistan is almost certain to respond. Saudi Arabia will be silent on an Indian/Israeli strike on Pakista, just as it as remained silent on the Afghanistan backed terror strikes and Afghan army aggression on Pakistan's sovereign territory.

Conclusion : The Saudi-Pakistan "defense pact" means very little
 
What's so special about the rights of KP people ?... rights of entire country has been denied.....in KP you at least have PTI government..... other provinces are not doing the Randi Rona like KP folks... attitude of KP government is border line seditious....spare us this tale of victim hood .

.
Thats your own shortcomings. Punjab especially. You sit there and tolerate the elite to ride roughshod over the whole country. I've seen videos of the dead TLP members bodies being snatched by punjab police from their homes - women trying to stop them being beaten. Where is the self respect of the people of that village or mohalla? It's dead, there is none.

You choose to tolerate the abuse and complain about everyone who doesn't. What do you gain from tolerating the abuse? What Europe has Punjab become by consistently rolling over to the military dictators or the political elite?

I support military operations against terrorists anywhere in Pakistan, or abroad. I don't agree with IK or PTI for their opposition to such operations. However the grievances of the people of Pakistan against the Army especially, are legitimate, as the army allows itself to be a tool of the oppressor, when it's not taking it's turn to be the oppressor.
 
Your agreements mean jackshit if they don't even acknowledge them, I am convinced they have Humiliation kink ATP

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Your agreements mean jackshit if they don't even acknowledge them, I am convinced they have Humiliation kink ATP

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top