Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Lulldapull]

Good roundup at the Duran.

 

[Immortals]

 

[tsunset]

US and Israel should be dealt with the same way humans deal against rat infestations

Not only repulsing and eliminating them, but prevent them from entering again and fill up all holes and flaws with cement so that they do not enter again

 

[lightning f57]

ALOT more tweeeting:



24 minutes ago

View attachment 214241


3 BEAUTIFUL ENGINESSSS - US Win!

Looks like even trump likes the J36

 

[lightning f57]

Wtf is wrong with him, the president of the united states is acting like an obsessed ex.

he knows he lost

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The key is the distance to the moving target.

If US warships keep far enough of Iran shore, Iran can't attack them. It's what happened since war started.

In fact, US aircraft carriers dont even dare to sail near Houthi coast since Iran war started, circling whole Africa, to avoid Bab el mandeb strait.

The danger is in sail near to coast.

It's plain to see, but for some reason USA likes to hide and create BS about this, like when they say they didnt resupply warships due to logistic centers damaged in Gulf ports, what it's a stupid thing, they can buy supplies everywhere in GCC, but they didnt because they would be near to Iran coast and easily targeted by Iran.

Iran is restraining, yes, they dont do all they can, they didnt launch nuclear dirty bombs to Israel cities and they could easily.

But I think there is no restrain against warships, they would sink if they could, remember USA sinking Iran warship in the first days of war and killing one hundred Iranian sailors.

And Iran has targeted US warships and launched attacks, but they didnt be able to sink anything, yet.

If the US naval ships keep staying from 1000 km away from Iran's coast, they would not be able to strike deep into Iran.

Also, Iran's navy was not really the main focus as their missile troops.

Whereas the USN is the main focus for the US military.

Iran seems to lack the high explosive warhead to sink a supercarrier with few shots, but to damage the catapults on the flight deck could also render a supercarrier useless.

And the supercarriers still represent the US symbol of might, and they are going to lose all their face if it got hit by Iran.

 

[Immortals]

 

[Immortals]

 

[Lulldapull]

he knows he lost

Man what a total disaster both Ukraine and Iran wars have become.

Totally beyond salvageable situations.

What happened to all the military/ civil leadership/ think tanks of the US?

Apparently ignored no?

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

Man what a total disaster both Ukraine and Iran wars have become.

Totally beyond salvageable situations.

What happened to all the military/ civil leadership/ think tanks of the US?

Apparently ignored no?

An example of what happened:



Woke policies, DEI, focus on social justice programs instead of war fighting capabilities, etc.

 

[KAL-EL]

If the US naval ships keep staying from 1000 km away from Iran's coast, they would not be able to strike deep into Iran.

Also, Iran's navy was not really the main focus as their missile troops.

Whereas the USN is the main focus for the US military.

Iran seems to lack the high explosive warhead to sink a supercarrier with few shots, but to damage the catapults on the flight deck could also render a supercarrier useless.

And the supercarriers still represent the US symbol of might, and they are going to lose all their face if it got hit by Iran.

Well of course it's your own personal wish to see a USN carrier sunk.
.
Well I hate to break up your obsession, it's not going to happen anytime soon

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Well of course it's your own personal wish to see a USN carrier sunk.
.
Well I hate to break up your obsession, it's not going to happen anytime soon

I have clearly stated in my previous post that I don't think that Iran will be able to sink it due of lacking the hyper explosive warheads.

However, to damage the catapults on the flight deck to incapacitate the supercarrier could be achievable if the supercarrier is getting too close to the Iranian coast.

 

[Immortals]

 

[KAL-EL]

I have clearly stated in my previous post that I don't think that Iran will be able to sink it due of lacking the hyper explosive warheads.

However, to damage the catapults on the flight deck to incapacitate the supercarrier could be achievable if the supercarrier is getting too close to the Iranian coast.

Okay that I can definitely agree with you on.

But you also have to remember that there's a carrier group surrounding it to help deflect anything going on...

It's not 100% foolproof, but it definitely helps a lot

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

I have clearly stated in my previous post that I don't think that Iran will be able to sink it due of lacking the hyper explosive warheads.

However, to damage the catapults on the flight deck to incapacitate the supercarrier could be achievable if the supercarrier is getting too close to the Iranian coast.

There is no need for any US carrier to get within range of Iranian missiles. The aerial refueling capacity currently in theater is more than sufficient to support any carrier-launched strike package all the way into the target(s) and back.

All of the reports to date of Iranian missile hits on US carriers have been figments of some people's very active imaginations. Numerous photos of the carriers have confirmed that.