40 countries with the highest military expenditure in 2022

ST1976

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
39
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

40 countries with the highest military expenditure in 2022​

Spending figures and GDP are in US dollars, at current prices and exchange rates. Changes are in real terms, based on constant (2021) US dollars. Percentages below 10 are rounded to 1 decimal place; those over 10 are rounded to whole numbers. Figures and percentage shares may not add up to stated totals or subtotals due to the conventions of rounding.

United States 877
China [292]
Russia [86.4]
India 81.4


https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2304_fs_milex_2022.pdf


. = data not available or not applicable; [ ] = estimated figure; GDP = gross domestic product.a Rankings for 2021 are based on updated military expenditure figures in the current edition of the SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. They may therefore differ from the rankings for 2021 given in SIPRI Yearbook 2022 and in other SIPRI publications released in 2022. b The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP are based on estimates of 2022 GDP from the International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook and International Financial Statistics databases.Sources: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, Apr. 2023; International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, Oct. 2022; and International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics Database, Sep. 2022
.
=> THE WORLD’S LARGEST MILITARY SPENDERS IN 2022The 15 largest spenders in 2022 together accounted for 82 per cent of world military expenditure, or $1842 billion (see table 1). There were some notable changes in ranking among the top 15 between 2021 and 2022, which were largely attributable to the war in Ukraine that started in February 2022. Russia, for example, increased its spending by an estimated 9.2 per cent to move from fifth to third largest spender in the world in 2022, while Ukraine entered the top 15 for the first time (at rank 11) after a 640 per cent increase in its military expenditure. Other notable changes among the top 15 included Saudi Arabia moving from eighth to fifth largest spender, ahead of the United Kingdom, Germany and France.
The United States (accounting for 39 per cent of world military spending in 2022) and China (13 per cent) remained the two largest spenders, with Russia (3.9 per cent), India (3.6 per cent) and Saudi Arabia (3.3 per cent) completing the top five (see figure 2). Together, these five countries accounted for 63 per cent of total global military spending in 2022.Six countries in the top 15 increased their military burdens—that is, military expenditure as a share of gross domestic product (GDP)—in 2022: France, Germany, Japan, Russia, Ukraine and the UK. At 34 per cent of GDP in 2022, Ukraine’s military burden was by far the largest of any country in the world. The 30 percentage point growth in Ukraine’s military burden was the result of a sharp contraction in its economy coupled with a more than sixfold increase in its military spending.

https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2304_fs_milex_2022.pdf

.
=>

The top 15 military spenders, 2022​

The top 15 military spenders, 2022

Military expenditure by the top 15 countries reached $1842 billion in 2022 and accounted for 82% of global military spending.

=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures#Military_expenditure,_total
 

2023 Military Strength Ranking​

here Pakistan is ranked at number 7 with PwrIndx* score of 0.1694,
how members see this GFP's ranking for this year? :)

2023 Military Strength Ranking

Ranking the nations of the world based on current available firepower.

 

China beats US in ultimate military strength index while India comes in fourth​

China​

China has the strongest military force in the world according to a study released on March 21 by defence website Military Direct. The study said "ultimate military strength index" was calculated after taking into consideration various factors including budgets, number of inactive and active military personnel, total air, sea, land and nuclear resources, average salaries, and weight of equipment. China has the strongest military in the world, scoring 82 out of 100 points in the index, it noted. China wins in a sea war with 406 ships vs Russia with 278 and the USA or India with 202, it said.

USA​

"The USA, despite their enormous military budgets, comes in 2nd place with 74 points. The world's biggest military spender with a budget of USD 732 billion per year is the USA, it noted, adding that China comes second with USD 261 billion, followed by India at USD 71 billion.

Russia​

Russia comes in third with a score of 69. The Russian Federation wins in a land war with 54,866 vehicles vs USA with 50,326 and China with 41,641," it mentioned.

India​

India is fourth with a score of 61. Soldiers are not paid relatively highly but it is not known whether the report takes account into other benefits and various tax rebates. India has 202 ships.


China beats US in ultimate military strength index while India comes in fourth - China

India is fourth with a score of 61. Soldiers are not paid relatively highly but it is not known whether the report takes account into other benefits and various tax rebates. India has 202 ships. India
 
  • Like
Reactions: FHN

1697191963833.png


 
A blue-water navy is a maritime force capable of operating globally, essentially across the deep waters of open oceans.[1] While definitions of what actually constitutes such a force vary, there is a requirement for the ability to exercise sea control at long range.

The term "blue-water navy" is a maritime geographical term in contrast with "brown-water navy" (river and near to shore) and "green-water navy" (near to shore).

The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency of the United States has defined the blue-water navy as "a maritime force capable of sustained operation across the deep waters of open oceans. A blue-water navy allows a country to project power far from the home country and usually includes one or more aircraft carriers. Smaller blue-water navies are able to dispatch fewer vessels abroad for shorter periods of time."[2]

China​

The People's Liberation Army Navy is subject to a variety of assessments regarding its capabilities. Writing for the US Naval Institute in 2012, Dr James Mulvenon believed that "the Chinese navy is still primarily a brown and green-water navy", highlighting problems with replenishment and logistics as key shortcomings in PLAN ambitions of becoming a blue-water capable fleet.[26] This line of thinking has also been held by a number of academics throughout the years, including Dr Peter Howarth,[21] Professor Timo Kivimäki,[27] Dr Denny Roy,[28] and Professor Bart Dessein.[29]

China's ambition towards blue-water capability received much attention, particularly from the United States Congress[30] and Department of Defense,[31] with both acknowledging that China's primary aim was to project power in the First and Second island chains.[31][32] In a 2013 report to Congress, defense experts also asserted that over the coming decades, China would gain the capability to project power across the globe – similar to Britain's 1982 Falklands War.[31] In addition, there were those who thought China already had a blue-water navy, such as British naval historian and professor Geoffrey Till,[9] and also, Professor David Shambaugh who believed that the PLAN had transitioned from a green-water navy to that of a "limited" blue-water navy.[33] According to Todd and Lindberg's classification system, the PLAN was a rank four "regional power projection navy".[20][16]

Since 2008, the PLAN has conducted anti-piracy missions in the Gulf of Aden on a continuous basis.[34]

France​

The French Navy is recognised as being a blue-water navy by various experts and academics.[A][11][24][25] According to professors Daniel Todd and Michael Lindberg, the French Navy is a rank two "limited global-reach power projection navy".[20][16]

India​

The Indian Navy is unique among Asian navies due to its long experience in carrier power projection since 1961.[37][38] This, according to Dr. George J. Gilboy and political scientist Eric Heginbotham, gives the Indian Navy the "leading power projection capability in the region".[37] The Indian Navy is also the only Asian navy considered to be a rank three "multi-regional power projection navy" per Todd and Lindberg's classification system.[20][16] In his discussion paper for Consultancy Africa Intelligence, Greg Ryan asserts that in recent years, the Indian Navy has emerged as a "global power in the blue water sense".[39]

Italy​

The Italian Navy was categorised as a "regional blue-water navy" in Liu Huaqing's Memoirs (1994),[49] and as a rank three "multi regional power projection navy" by Professors Daniel Todd and Michael Lindberg in 1996.

Russia​

The Soviet Navy maintained naval forces able to rival those of the United States; however, following the end of the Cold War and dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Russian Navy experienced a severe decline due to lack of funding.[55] By the late 1990s, there was little tangible evidence of Russian blue-water capability.[55]

United Kingdom​

The Royal Navy is considered to be a blue-water navy by naval experts and academics. This position is likely to be further cemented with the introduction of two new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, eighteen new frigates (8 Type 26, 5 Type 31, and 5 Type 32), and other warships currently being procured.[24][25][A]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue-water_navy#endnote_B A term used commonly in the United Kingdom is that the Royal Navy maintains a maritime expeditionary capability.[58] According to Todd and Lindberg's classification system, the Royal Navy is a rank two "limited global-reach power projection navy".[20][16]

United States

The United States Navy is considered a blue-water navy by experts and academics.[11][24][25] It is distinguished from other power projection navies in that it is considered a global blue-water navy, able to operate in the deep waters of every ocean simultaneously.[9] According to Todd and Lindberg's classification system, the United States Navy is a rank one "global-reach power projection navy", and the only navy to occupy this rank.

From green-water to blue-water

While considered to be a green-water navy,[9] the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force is undergoing transition to develop blue-water capabilities.
The Republic of Korea Navy also has ambitions to develop blue-water capabilities.
The Brazilian Navy is experiencing a "shift in maritime priorities" with ambitions of developing a blue-water navy.[

Blue-water navy - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
 
Navy_capabilities[1].png
List of green-water navies (green) and blue-water navies (blue)
A green-water navy is a maritime force that is capable of operating in its nation's littoral zones and has limited competency to operate in the surrounding marginal seas.[1] It is a relatively new term, and has been created to better distinguish, and add nuance, between two long-standing descriptors: blue-water navy (open oceans) and brown-water navy (inland and shallow littoral waters).
 
India’s new Navy chief pilots ‘blue-water’ strategy

India’s new Navy chief sits at the helm of an emergent, “blue-water navy” strategically positioning the country’s stated aspirations to command a dominant role in the Indian Ocean.

Admiral Devendra Kumar Joshi, 58, replaced retiring Navy chief Admiral Nirmal Kumar Verma on Aug. 31. India’s Navy has 123 ships and 11 submarines.

Blue-water navy refers to the ability to exercise sea control at wide ranges. Specifically, the term describes a “maritime force capable of sustained operation across open oceans, project power from the home country and usually includes one or more aircraft carriers,” according to U.S. Defense Security.

Naval build up expected

A total of 46 new war ships and submarines are under construction and about 15 are expected to be added to the fleet during Joshi’s three-year tenure.

Projects slated for the next three years include a Russian-built aircraft carrier, U.S.-built long-range reconnaissance planes, an indigenous nuclear-powered submarine under construction, and a dedicated naval satellite.

The new ships and submarines will add to India’s presence as a maritime power and reinforce its capabilities on the high seas.

India’s maritime activity is gaining world recognition, marking the period as the country’s biggest naval power increase since independence from Britain in 1947.

Visiting India in June, U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta said, “In terms of regional security, our vision is a peaceful Indian Ocean region supported by growing Indian capabilities.

“India is one of the largest and most dynamic countries in the region. … India is at the crossroads of Asia, the crossroads of the new global economy, and at the crossroads of regional security. We will stand with India at those crossroads.”

Developments during Joshi’s tenure will be watched from both sides of the Pacific Ocean.

Anti-submarine warfare specialist at the helm

Joshi, who was commissioned in 1974, is the 21st chief of the Navy since the country’s independence. He is a specialist in anti-submarine warfare and has served in command, staff and instructional appointments.

His experience includes a stint in warship production and acquisition as the assistant controller of the Aircraft Carrier Program [ACCP]. He then worked at the “Operations Branch,” first as an assistant chief of naval staff [Information Warfare and Operations] and then as deputy chief of naval staff. Notably, Joshi has been the commander-in-chief of the Andaman and Nicobar Command, the only tri-service integrated command in India.

He went on to serve as the chief of Integrated Defence Staff and was the Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command at Mumbai. He served as the defense adviser in the Indian High Commission at Singapore from 1996 to 1999.

A native of Dehradun in the northern state of Uttarakhand, Joshi studied at Hansraj College in New Delhi. He graduated from the U.S. Naval War College in Rhode Island and attended the National Defense College in New Delhi.

Joshi is requesting not only changes to hardware, but infrastructure as well, saying, “We would need to professionally re-audit, train and consolidate preparedness.”

Overall expansion plan

In addition to the 46 ships under construction, “acceptance of necessity” for 49 more ships and submarines has been approved by the Indian government. The vessels under construction include an aircraft carrier to be constructed in India along with destroyers, corvettes and six submarines to be constructed in France.


The first to be added to the fleet will be new warships of the existing “Delhi Class” destroyers, starting early next year. The ships feature improved stealth features and weapons. Also under construction are eight new landing craft utility [LCUs] vessels, used in amphibious warfare to augment the fleet in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal.

The Navy commissioned 15 ships in the past three years, including four stealth frigates, two fleet tankers and eight water jet fast attack craft [WJFAC]. Future plans include a deep submergence and rescue vessel [DSRV], six additional submarines, four Landing Platform Docks and 16 shallow-water anti-submarine warfare [ASW] ships. :-)

Last month the Navy issued a request for proposals [RFP] to acquire 56 naval utility helicopters customized for surveillance, anti-submarine warfare, anti-terror, electronic intelligence gathering and search-and-rescue operations. The RFP, which may result in U.S. $1 billion in purchases, has been sent to leading U.S., European and Russian helicopter makers. The Navy has more than 100 helicopters.

Another aircraft carrier on sea trial

India is set to be a two-carrier Navy at the end of the year. [China will catch up soon with one aircraft carrier constructed in Ukraine and undergoing sea trials.] India’s new carrier is a refitted Russian craft previously named Admiral Gorshkov. Renamed Indian Naval Ship [INS] Vikramaditya, the vessel has gone through a U.S. $2.35 billion refit program and will have Russian-built MiG 29K fighters flying off its deck. The 49,130-ton carrier started a four-month sea trial in June in the Barents Sea and is slated to join the fleet by the end of the year.

The other carrier, the INS Viraat, is set to be phased out by 2017 and replaced by another carrier being built at a state-owned shipyard in Kochi, Kerala, on India’s western seaboard.

Meanwhile, India says the INS Arihant, “the slayer of enemies,” will be sea-launched soon. The 6,614-ton nuclear submarine will provide second-strike capability in response to a potential initial enemy nuclear strike. Modeled on the Russian Akula class submarine design, the Arihant is being constructed at Vishakapatnam on the east coast of India.

At an August news conference, Verma, the then-navy chief, said: “Arihant is steadily progressing towards operationalization, and we hope to commence sea trials in the coming months. … Navy is poised to complete the [nuclear] triad, and our maritime and nuclear doctrines will then be aligned to ensure our nuclear insurance comes from the sea.”

Long-range reconnaissance aircraft

In November 2008 terrorists used the sea route to reach Mumbai on India’s west coast to launch an attack, killing 166 people. In response, the Indian government approved the purchase of 12 long-range reconnaissance planes, the P-8I, produced by Boeing. The first is slated to arrive in January 2013. India operates the Russian origin IL-38 and the Tupelov-142 for long-range reconnaissance at sea.

The P-8I will provide real-time information and can be deployed in locations such as the Indian Naval Air Station, INS Baaz also known as “the Hawk.” The P-8I will provide constant updates on the Strait of Malacca and also the “six degree channel” – the main shipping channel between the Indian and Pacific oceans.

The Strait is an important link between European markets and oil in the Gulf on one side, and China, Japan and Korea on the other side. Nearly 70,000 vessels pass through the Strait annually – about 40 percent of all global trade. :coffee:

In conjunction with the Indian Space Research Organization, the Navy is slated to launch a communications satellite that will provide communications among all its warships, helicopters, aircraft and submarines.

INDIA’S NEW NAVY CHIEF PILOTS ‘BLUE-WATER’ STRATEGY - Asia Pacific Defense Forum in English

//apdforum.com/en_GB/article/rmiap/articles/online/features/2012/09/27/india-navy-chief
 
Russia is not comparable to the US or even China in terms of self-sufficiency. The US can manage while being in an economic war with both China and Russia and China can also get by if it is cut off from the US and Russia. However, Russia will collapse if China joins western sanctions against it. Russia does not have the agency to be an independent power.It is going to end up becoming a glorified client state of China unless there is a regime change.

since Cold War time, we find India-Russia combined overweight US in having a 'total' dependence on ourselves/in terms of self-sufficiency.
here, Indian engineers help Russia more than what Russia contribute in India :coffee:
 
one dollar in china military produce more things than one dollar in USA.

half USA military budget must go straight to the bank accounts of owners of industrial-military complex, producing nothing but keep alive a parasite ruling elite.
 
one dollar in china military produce more things than one dollar in USA.

half USA military budget must go straight to the bank accounts of owners of industrial-military complex, producing nothing but keep alive a parasite ruling elite.
cost of US military operations such as training and planning, maintenance of equipment amounted to 318 billion in 2023 fiscal year.The second largest category, military personnel, supports pay and retirement benefits for service members and cost $184 billion in 2023.Procurement of weapons and systems cost $142 billion in 2023 and $122 billion was spent on research and development of weapons and equipment. The military also spent over $10 billion on the construction and management of military facilities and $1 billion on family housing.no wonder why they are falling behind.
1726779670704.png
142 billion in procurement of weapons is not enough when you account the purchasing power advantage that China and Russia have over the United states. Pentagon falls victim to price gouging by military contractors doesn't help either. Lol
 
US spending might be crazy but it doesn't seem that threatening to China when she only allocates 1.5 percent of her gdp on military defense. China can play this game with the United states and come out on top.imagine what china military industrial complex can really do with 500 billion dollar budget.
 
cost of US military operations such as training and planning, maintenance of equipment amounted to 318 billion in 2023 fiscal year.The second largest category, military personnel, supports pay and retirement benefits for service members and cost $184 billion in 2023.Procurement of weapons and systems cost $142 billion in 2023 and $122 billion was spent on research and development of weapons and equipment. The military also spent over $10 billion on the construction and management of military facilities and $1 billion on family housing.no wonder why they are falling behind.
View attachment 65903
142 billion in procurement of weapons is not enough when you account the purchasing power advantage that China and Russia have over the United states. Pentagon falls victim to price gouging by military contractors doesn't help either. Lol
Besides keep in mind: It's a lot more expensive innovate than copy other people innovations.

A lot of money can be spent in research that finally goes to nowhere.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • FHN
Back
Top