A diminished India

Daaktar sb.

Dhandhos have every party in their pocket.

A journalist asked Raj Thackeray why doesn't he spoke out against Dhando crony capitalists. He said why should I?

Samjdar ko ishaare kaafi hai

I don't deny it.

But Parsis are also Gujaratis.

Dhando is ours too.

And Rahul for us is an existential choice. Not a political one.

And I do not mean existential in business terms alone.

We will not cede our position as equals on top of the social pecking order that easily.
 
I don't deny it.

But Parsis are also Gujaratis.

Dhando is ours too.

And Rahul for us is an existential choice. Not a political one.
You are Parsis. Not Gujjus.

Parsis are Parsis irrespective where they reside in India.

Parsis happen to be big industrialists as well.

But one don't club them together with Jain Gujju Meros. They are progressive and liberal in outlook. Not stingy as well.

People admire Ratan Tata

People despise Ambani and Adani.
 
Daaktar sb.

Dhandhos have every party in their pocket.

A journalist asked Raj Thackeray why doesn't he spoke out against Dhando crony capitalists. He said why should I?

Samjdar ko ishaare kaafi hai

Raj is a huge disappointment to all of us.

Balasaheb must be turning in his grave.

I used to be a big fan. Even shared some circles.
 
Its an advanced sign of dementia. I heard that people stop understanding reality once dementia sets in. Pakistan as an entire country seems to have that issue.

There is one thing that Indian government has been doing exceptionally well for past 10 years that is foreign relations. Its a masterclass in diplomacy.
Yeah pure ‘masterclass’ that’s why China took and is still sat on 20000 square km of what was Indian occupied land, without so much as a whimper from Indian leadership. Indian foreign policy under Modi is riddled with with politicaly motivated ‘surgical strikes’ utter lies & political appointments.
 
Balasaheb must be turning in his grave.
I don't think you understand.

Mumbai had a strong communist workers union.


Dhandos wanted to exploit employees. Communists were a kebab mein hadi.

So the Dhandos and Congress gave supari to Original Sena to eliminate communists. They did eliminate them.

@Joe Shearer dada can provide more insights
 
I don't think you understand.

Mumbai had a strong communist workers union.


Dhandos wanted to exploit employees. Communists were a kebab mein hadi.

So the Dhandos and Congress gave supari to Original Sena to eliminate communists. They did eliminate them.

@Joe Shearer dada can provide more insights

Of course I know our history bro.
 
Wish we all did. Especially history of Dhandos.

We would have avoided history repeating itself

Gau belt needs to first study in proper schools and not whatsapp and you tube and reels.

Bahut jahalat hai bhai. Too much.
 
Gau belt needs to first study in proper schools and not whatsapp and you tube and reels.

Bahut jahalat hai bhai. Too much.
That's by design. Hindi belt was destroyed by Dhandos. Casteism and corruption was encouraged.


Btw your schools dont teach you real history.

They made British the Villains. But forgot to tell us how the peasants and farmers hated Jain Gujarati Marwadi Bania moneylenders more than the British. How these Dhandos joined hands with the invaders to enrich themselves at cost of other Indians.
 
That's by design. Hindi belt was destroyed by Dhandos. Casteism and corruption was encouraged.


Btw your schools dont teach you real history.

They made British the Villains. But forgot to tell us how the peasants and farmers hated Jain Gujarati Marwadi Bania moneylenders more than the British. How these Dhandos joined hands with the invaders to enrich themselves at cost of other Indians.

Bro!

You are talking as if pre British rhat region was Oxford Yale and Cambridge combined

Zyada ho gaya.

Paani piyo.
 
Bro!

You are talking as if pre British rhat region was Oxford Yale and Cambridge combined

Zyada ho gaya.

Paani piyo.
We are talking about post Independence. Not British Raj Era.

Which state had the biggest economy after independence?
Ans : UP

Surprised?


TmDhandos shifted industries to western India. Brought in freight equalization. Promoted regional inequality.

I am not defending Bhaiyye log. I am stating facts.
 
Bro!

You are talking as if pre British rhat region was Oxford Yale and Cambridge combined

Zyada ho gaya.

Paani piyo.
its funny how commies relate or try to relate everything through there lense but still get confused why do people dont behave in an "ORDERLLY MANNER" ;) :P

fact is there is not one commuinst nation where there were people not standing begging for food and clothing and revolted against there communist leaders

these commies hate market ecenomy but where ever there was market economy that nation developed but once scoialist freebee schemes started hapenning that nation failed most recentlly "Vanizuella" which had the most gorgeuos women ... i was a keen "watcher" of beuty pagents but once commies came there they again destroyed that OIL RICH nation

west bengal which was the most industrial and progressive & upward thinking part of India under commies became WASTE BENGAL within couple of decades and just look at Kerala the GODS OWN COUNTRY has now become a ISIS recruitemnt ground thanks to commies with almost NILL industrial growth even with so called 100% littreaccy

while just look what and how the so called commies in bengal for there hate towards so called "north indian" marwari and gujrati buissnessmen mindset helped bangaldeshi paulwalters and supplied them with fake ADHAAR cards and now they have changed demography of these same so called "bhadrlock" & "bhiplabies" and forcing them out of there own lands and its very soon going to repeat what hapenned in kashmir in 1990 or Navakhalli in 1947 to these same "SICKULAR LIBERALs " at hands of same snakes they are rearing in there home
 
its funny how commies relate or try to relate everything through there lense but still get confused why do people dont behave in an "ORDERLLY MANNER" ;) :P

fact is there is not one commuinst nation where there were people not standing begging for food and clothing and revolted against there communist leaders

these commies hate market ecenomy but where ever there was market economy that nation developed but once scoialist freebee schemes started hapenning that nation failed most recentlly "Vanizuella" which had the most gorgeuos women ... i was a keen "watcher" of beuty pagents but once commies came there they again destroyed that OIL RICH nation

west bengal which was the most industrial and progressive & upward thinking part of India under commies became WASTE BENGAL within couple of decades and just look at Kerala the GODS OWN COUNTRY has now become a ISIS recruitemnt ground thanks to commies with almost NILL industrial growth even with so called 100% littreaccy

while just look what and how the so called commies in bengal for there hate towards so called "north indian" marwari and gujrati buissnessmen mindset helped bangaldeshi paulwalters and supplied them with fake ADHAAR cards and now they have changed demography of these same so called "bhadrlock" & "bhiplabies" and forcing them out of there own lands and its very soon going to repeat what hapenned in kashmir in 1990 or Navakhalli in 1947 to these same "SICKULAR LIBERALs " at hands of same snakes they are rearing in there home
This was I talking about yesterday.

Sangh attracts bottom shelf talent.

Top shelf talent never joins it.

His Marwadi brothers are still migrating to Bengal in hordes. Marwad still performs very low on HDI.

The Bangladeshis he hatea are employed by Dhandos like him. Because they work for less.

This why you can't trust a Dhando
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Imran Jan

July 11, 2024

There is an interesting scene in one of Quentin Tarantino’s movies titled Django Unchained. DiCaprio is the white slave owner of Black men, depicting the days of slavery in America. In the scene, DiCaprio is having two Black men fight with each other where victory means the death of the opponent. That is the sort of entertainment white men liked to enjoy back then. The victorious Black man kills his intra-racial fellow and earns a large bottle of some kind of alcoholic drink along with a slave girl for the night. He stands tall and appears physically very strong and grand but very small in terms of respect and dignity.

I described that scene because there is a strong parallel between that scene and how India behaves in global politics nowadays. I had a chance to watch an Indian news channel on YouTube, which for some reason was in English. Some female anchor in her thick Indian accent was talking about news in English. Not only was she describing India in a manner like India was perhaps the most important player on the world political scene but also that India was this badass nation-state that could intimidate others. The show could easily pass for a comedy one but that is not how they had categorized it. Perhaps YouTube’s algorithm should evolve a little.

She was talking about India being this strong and powerful nation that can scare China into changing the latter’s foreign policy. She also said something along the lines where India was so important and aggressive that a global meeting being held soon would be attended by Putin and Xi but only the Indian foreign minister would go and that Modi decided to skip because India had better things to do. Pure comedy.
India is evolving its global posturing toward Russia and China in a quite aggressive manner. But none of this is India’s own policies. Just as Pakistan since its inception believed in borrowed power using alliances with the west, today’s India is using what could rightly be called as borrowed posturing. Russia and China are not India’s enemies as much as India is being told to see them as such. In fact, Russia was quite an ally of India during the Cold War. Even Bollywood in so many movies of Amitabh and others favoured a sympathetic stance toward communism. That, as much as Pakistan and America would have been against, was India’s own organic stance. This current Indian saber rattling at China and Russia are totally synthetic stances made in Washington DC.
If the past is any indication, the US foreign policy goals executed by another state have never served that state. India tries to appear aggressive and tall but in reality has become a proud puppet state of the United States. What is more alarming is that other US puppet states are enlisted by merely enlisting some of the strongmen inside the country. In India’s case, however, the entire nation of 1.6 or so billion people is very welcoming to the daily teachings of the media that somehow being the US puppet state was the most miraculous thing to have happened to this nation. Perhaps that is what they mean by the dark side of democracy. Just like the Black man in that scene described above, India also hates because the hate is manufactured for it by people other than its own. It may like to congratulate itself for signaling aggressive postures to heavyweights such as Russia and China, but it is only causing its own standing to diminish. India has become a textbook puppet state that is not even objecting to it.

Hitler and his followers were quite educated people and they also believed very genuinely that theirs was a just cause and that they were on to a righteous mission.
The author is lack the knowledge. Nothing much to say on this article.

Indian foreign policies actually always being appreciated all around the world. Indian interests come first for india - india never follow USa or anyone if it goes against our national interests.
 
Last edited:
This was I talking about yesterday.

Sangh attracts bottom shelf talent.

Top shelf talent never join it.

His Marwadi brothers still migrating to Bengal in hordes. Marwad still perform very low on HDI.

The Bangladeshis he hatea are employed by Dhandos like him. Because they work for less.

This why you can't trust a Dhando

I agree with him 100% on commies and muslims that he talks about. Just btw.

But ask him what happened in Jammu. No commies there. What happened in Delhi. No commies. What happened in Kashmir. No commies.

How many Pandits did BJP and Hindu Hriday Samrat repatriate to Kashmir?

How many pole vaulters, Bangladeshi and Rohingya (they same folk in my eyes) did Hindu Hriday Samrat kick out of India.

Answers are clear before junta. Elections showed it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top