Abu Dhabi is ‘Israel’s Trojan horse’.

_Arabia_

SpeedLimited
Joined
Dec 9, 2024
Messages
2,733
Reaction score
2,632
Reputation
850.8
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The al-Tuwaijri family is a very respected family that has had close ties with the power circles within KSA.

Not yet watched the full interview as it is very long (almost 2 hours) but he no doubt is privy to knowledge that is not publicly known.

More about Ahmed al-Tuwaijri:

Dr Ahmed Altuwaijri
Dr Ahmed Altuwaijri is a Saudi thinker, academic, lawyer and poet holding a Ph.D in comparative philosophy from the university of Oregon, Eugene, USA. He is a former professor and dean of the college of education at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He was a member of parliament (Shura Council) in Saudi Arabia for two consecutive sessions. He is now the president of “International Justice”, a nonprofit international organization Specializing in documenting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, and prosecuting their perpetrators. He is also the president of “World Peace Forum”, a nonprofit organization specializing in spreading the culture of peace in the world. Both organizations are based in France.

 
The professors views are appreciated howver its Too little too late.

Maybe saudis have now realised their is a zionist encirclement going on with Israel-UAE in cahoots. Or they finally have realised the greater israel project is real, and they are going to eat up land after land.
 
The professors views are appreciated howver its Too little too late.

Maybe saudis have now realised their is a zionist encirclement going on with Israel-UAE in cahoots. Or they finally have realised the greater israel project is real, and they are going to eat up land after land.
You don't think that KSA was well aware of Abu Dhabi's schemes and motives long ago? When even ordinary private observers could see it?

Where have you been lately as well? Did you not see how KSA destroyed Abu Dhabi/Zionist plots in Yemen, plots they had planned for 8 years and spent billions on, within the span of mere days?

Did you not see how KSA, along with Turkiye, helped foil Abu Dhabi's and the Zionists plans in Syria in relation to the Kurdish SDF/PKK cult? Our Syrian Arab brothers reclaimed 95% of the occupied Syrian lands within a very short amount of time as well.

KSA foiled the plots of Abu Dhabi and the Zionists in Somalia as well. Abu Dhabi became persona non grata and KSA signed several military deals with Somalia, established a naval base and will now be much more greatly involved in Somalia. Same with Turkiye.

Same thing is occurring in Sudan, KSA pressure and direct support for Khartoum in recent weeks and months has also had a positive effect.

Mind you, KSA has just started and is still trying to get the Abu Dhabi regime back to their senses, in particularly MBZ. Qatar is mediating right now for instance.

KSA has used almost nothing within our tool box yet.

In fact the only thing that prevents us from directly annexing UAE as a whole is the US. Same with the rest of the GCC.

In fact in the modern era the West (UK) used bombing campaigns against the Saudi Arabian Ikhwan (first such attacks on Muslims in recorded history) who were about to invade and annex Transjordan and Iraq before WW1 and shortly after.

Any real genuine unification projects will also emerge from KSA as throughout all of recorded history. That I have zero doubts about as well.

There is no way that the Zionists and the Abu Dhabi regime will succeed with their plots. I can guarantee you that.
 
Look at the hosting of American bases and willingness to deal with Israel

In that case you may as well count every Arab country.

Bahrain has always been very very pro Saudi and in fact much of their armed forces are made up of Pakistanis on deputation or retired.
 
In that case you may as well count every Arab country.

Bahrain has always been very very pro Saudi and in fact much of their armed forces are made up of Pakistanis on deputation or retired.

They were one of the first to sell out to the Jews rats

These kinglets were supported for one reason alone, so they could be manipulated to support a western presence and not allow a single state with massive resources to emerge
 
He is right em-rats have been vermin for a long time, same as Bahrain
Bahrain does not play any role geopolitically in the region at all. They are economically and militarily completely dependent on KSA. The ruling royal family is originally from KSA as is 90% of their native population, Sunni and Shia alike. The only reason they have not been annexed long ago by KSA is once again due to the US presence and UK/US pressure throughout the past 100 years.

What is today Bahrain has been part of ancient pre-Islamic empires, civilizations and cultures ruled by people from modern-day KSA or based in modern-day KSA. From the Dilmun civilization (one of the world's oldest civilizations - 6000 years old), which was based in Eastern Arabia (Eastern Province of modern-day KSA) throughout the numerous caliphates, empires, kingdoms, sultanates, imamates, emirates, sheikdoms etc. that were founded by people and dynasties from modern-day KSA or ruled from modern-day KSA.

The reason why there are Shia Muslims in Bahrain today is also due to past Shia Arab dynasties from modern-day KSA (Najd and Eastern Province).





They allowed the Americans to set up a military base in Bahrain as a protection against a possible KSA annexation, just like all the other smaller GCC states. Same way the Al-Udeid base in Qatar came to be. After the coup in 1995 (back then Qatar was literally another province of KSA) this became state policy.

I don't blame them or the regimes for such a policy as who would not want to remain in power if possible? However that is the reality on the ground - a reality that is likely to change to what history was throughout 99% of the time (reunification) organically - not necessarily through KSA directly annexing any fellow Arabian land but by popular will and geopolitical ground realities that will force this upon the region out of necessity.

Any way this is not about Bahrain but Abu Dhabi acting as a trojan horse for the Zionists. I am in the process of listening to the interview and so far Ahmed is saying all the right things.
 
They allowed the Americans to set up a military base in Bahrain as a protection against a possible KSA annexation, just like all the other smaller GCC states. Same way the Al-Udeid base in Qatar c

That's the point, kinglets that can be manipulated by the west to get a presence in the Muslim world and often the first to bend to western demands and spread debauchery and fitna on the peninsula
 
They were one of the first to sell out to the Jews rats

These kinglets were supported for one reason alone, so they could be manipulated to support a western presence and not allow a single state with massive resources to emerge

Unsure you are right
 
That's the point, kinglets that can be manipulated by the west to get a presence in the Muslim world and often the first to bend to western demands and spread debauchery and fitna on the peninsula
You would be doing the same thing in their shoes, so would I and 99.99% of everyone else. States come and go. Before the British presence and colonization of modern-day Pakistan (South Asia as a whole too), Pakistan was made up of 100's of fiefdoms and small kingdoms.

The reality is that they exist today and we need to operate in that reality. Qatar is doing a lot of good as well, irrespective of allowing US bases in the region. Once again this gives them influence and it also acts like protection for them.

The aim should be to correct Abu Dhabi regime mischief and for the GCC to continue to evolve into a strong organization that hopefully eventually would lead to unification of Arabia again, into 1 strong powerful bloc with a unified policy.

We cannot suddenly change 100 + years of history. The US is deeply ingrained in the region, in Southern Europe next door, Africa next door, Asia next door.

If KSA goes full retard, like Saddam did back in 1991 when he annexed Kuwait, it would just play right into the hands of the Zionists.

USA would never allow KSA (KSA controlling so much oil, gas and mineral wealth already - 3 richest nation on the planet after 6.5 times larger Russia and 4 times larger USA - is already a big problem aside from being a unified state - largest in the region - ideally they would have loved KSA to be divided into 10 countries) to control most of the world's oil and gas if we annexed all of the GCC. Nobody would be interested in that. Not Turkiye, not Iran not anybody. Not Russia, not China. Everyone is out there for its own interests.

I am sure that Pakistan (military regime) would not be interested in that either. You know how your elites love UAE (Dubai) and how they are earning a living from Bahrain and Qatar as well.

BTW we can say the same thing about Jordan, this is another modern creation that has no historical precedent. This part of Arabia is an ancient part of Northern Hejaz (one of the richest regions in the world in terms of ancient cultures and civilizations) and the local people are identical to us Hejazis. Even their royal dynasty was imported from Hejaz. Transjordan was created in order to prevent KSA from having a direct border with Palestine and Syria.

All of this will eventually be put into order in a organic fashion long-term. If we need a large-scale regional war for that, so be it. Huge changes occur only in such a climate anyway. We are ready for this.
 
Last edited:
You would be doing the same thing in their shoes, so would I and 99.99% of everyone else. States come and go. Before the British presence and colonization of modern-day Pakistan (South Asia as a whole too), Pakistan was made up of 100's of fiefdoms and small kingdoms.

The reality is that they exist today and we need to operate in that reality. Qatar is doing a lot of good as well, irrespective of allowing US bases in the region. Once again this gives them influence and it also acts like protection for them.

The aim should be to correct Abu Dhabi regime mischief and for the GCC to continue to evolve into a strong organization that hopefully eventually would lead to unification of Arabia again, into 1 strong powerful bloc with a unified policy.

We cannot suddenly change 100 + years of history. The US is deeply ingrained in the region, in Southern Europe next door, Africa next door, Asia next door.

If KSA goes full retard, like Saddam did back in 1991 when he annexed Kuwait, it would just play right into the hands of the Zionists.

USA would never allow KSA to control most of the world's oil and gas if we annexed all of the GCC. Nobody would be interested in that. Not Turkiye, not Iran not anybody. Not Russia, not China. Everyone is out there for its own interests.

I am sure that Pakistan (military regime) would not be interested in that either. You know how your elites love UAE (Dubai) and how they are earning a living from Bahrain and Qatar as well.

If you read your post, your making my case about how these kinglets are a threat and how they are controlled by the U.S and west

The GCC and Muslim world will never be free until this situation is changed
 
If you read your post, your making my case about how these kinglets are a threat and how they are controlled by the U.S and west

The GCC and Muslim world will never be free until this situation is changed
They are only a threat if they are deviating from the established policies and acting like trojan horses - as the current Abu Dhabi regime (MBZ) has been doing in recent years. While I am personally a big believer in Arab unity, as most Arabs are, and see no real purpose for the division of Arabia in the first place in an ideal world, we need to operate in the reality we live in.

You can say the same thing about the entire Muslim world. There are artificial divisions everywhere you look and regimes who are acting like trojan horses and who are only interested in their self-preservation. I can give you many examples from Africa, the Middle East, South East Asia, South Asia etc. but this would likely change the direction of this thread.

If the GCC was located in an irreelvant (geopolitically) region of the world, did not have one of the world's largest natural and mineral wealth on the planet, did not border some of the most important trade routes on the planet, did not have the religious, cultural, linguistic, historical etc. weight, we would not have the foremost superpower of the world (USA) so deeply ingrained in the region. It is simple geopolitics.

Even if Arabia was unified (or the entire Arab world for that matter), the US would still be around for those above mentioned reasons. Same reason why the British Empire and French Empires of the past tried and partially succeeded with their meddling starting during the Napoleonic era. Same reason why the Crusades occurred, before that Roman and Byzantine empire meddling etc. Geography another simple reason - Europe's largest border (maritime) is with the Arab world and people to people relations have occurred since Neolithic times (12.000 + years ago) which occurred in the Arab world before spreading to the rest of the world. In fact most Europeans, the majority of their DNA is originally from the Arab world. You can Google this or ask AI models. So even if we wanted them completely gone from our backs, this is not going to occur. Same way the influence was the other way around, Semitic Phoenicians native to the Arab world founding many of Europe's currently largest cities, civilizations native to the Arab world influencing Greek, Roman/Italian culture in every sphere, 800 years of Arab rule influencing every walk of life etc. The Mediterranean has acted like a high-way of mutual influences for millennia. Since Neolithic times as I wrote. We cannot escape this geography whether we like it or not.

Also do not forget that the US is basically an extension of Europe. Albeit demographics are changing making it more Latin in origin but even the Latinos are a mixture of local Indian tribes and Spaniards/Portuguese etc. mixed with some African admixture. Culturally, religiously and linguistically (Spanish) they are all an extension of Europe. Ironically the Latinos have been heavily influenced by Arab culture (Spanish is heavily influenced by Arabic), ethnically - Spanish and Portuguese people have 15-20% Arab/Moorish admixture on average - some regions even more, cuisine, architecture, music, culture etc. due to 800 years of Arab presence in Iberia. So another example of how interconnected we are.

That is why long-term planning and working towards unification in every way is the right policy. The GCC is a great tool towards that. It is also important to educate Arabs, regardless of nationality of the historical reality of our region and not for Arabs to be too attached to their current national states (while loyalty and love for your land and country should be encouraged) we must never forget the greater picture and the history of the region.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top