Attack on Jaffer Express

[r3alist]

Here's the plan. Destroy the bases in Afghanistan. Yes the human shields will die too but that's the price for peace.

Treat baloch like law and order and create a FBI to deal with them as a domestic issue. Start development work immediately after like giving Quetta a facelift.

Just cut the supply lines.

That's the reactionary thing to do when you have a sugar rush

Eventually the sugar rush goes

you might have to do some of that as an immediate reaction

But you need to think along the lines of how do you bring the maximum level of civilization to people who have refused it





I read responses here that effectively take this option of the table due to assumptions or negativity or colonial assumptions


If that's true then I don't see the point of even being interested in this

 

[r3alist]

She’s their deep state put out to for the liberal world order. It’s another side of the same coin. The Hindutva right wing is the either. They play the world like a flute. An Indian no matter his or her belief is loyal to India. Many Pakistanis do not understand nationalism as it’s forbidden in Islam.

Does anyone thinks they don’t dream and plan to destroy Pakistan in any shape or form as it’s the biggest block to them truly becoming a regional power and then a world power. They now the west can just armed Pakistan to keep Indian power in check until Pakistan is destroyed the Indians won’t stop or rest. Many of them here are likely intelligence agents gathering data in my personal opinion.

She certainly controls the narrative very closely

 

[Waterboy]

Transition would be the word. Reversal of the latest episode of power grabbing, respecting what people have (had) decided, allowing space for the process to continue. And phase wise yield way.

Let’s stop digging everyone deeper into the hole.

Lol its starts with khan and ends with khan.

 

[hussain0216]

The job of the intelligence agencies is to find plots and terrorists. There are many intelligence agencies around the world who are doing better job than ISI.

Ok, if the is gives your targets throughout Balochistan and Afghanistan where our enemies are present

Then why not bomb and destroy those targets killing everyone?

 

[That_Guy]

What I'm most interested in now is the response.

Will be have a strong response that we saw from Fmr COAS Gen. Raheel Shareef?

Or are we gonna get more of the same bs "targeted ops" that don't do anything have no real impact.

Are we finally gonna get the government to commit more resources into uplifting the baloch people, so the BLA no longer has a moral leg to stand on?

So many questions, and so far no answers.

 

[Waterboy]

Ok, if the is gives your targets throughout Balochistan and Afghanistan where our enemies are present

Then why not bomb and destroy those targets killing everyone?

Not that easy. It gives indian the same excuse to carry out more Feb 19. It's not like we are reginal power. We are piss poor and everyone wants a pound of flesh. You can't just start carrying out strikes.

The best solution is to man the border no matter the cost. End smuggling and regulate trade. Then look inwards towards reforms with the number 1 being regulation of religion with secular office system.

 

[Great Mal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

From this video we can see around 10 armed offloading hostages off the train maybe another 15 or so were in backup.

So how did the army managed to kill 33 ? Are we sure we didn't mislabel hostages as terrorists (going by our track record not out of the ordinary)

 

[hussain0216]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

From this video we can see around 10 armed offloading hostages off the train maybe another 15 or so were in backup.

So how did the army managed to kill 33 ? Are we sure we didn't mislabel hostages as terrorists (going by our track record not out of the ordinary)

Their were around 50-70 terrorists involved, many ran off when the attack started some were struck by ucav

For example who do you think was holding the camera from distance

 

[r3alist]

What I'm most interested in now is the response.

Will be have a strong response that we saw from Fmr COAS Gen. Raheel Shareef?

Or are we gonna get more of the same bs "targeted ops" that don't do anything have no real impact.

Are we finally gonna get the government to commit more resources into uplifting the baloch people, so the BLA no longer has a moral leg to stand on?

So many questions, and so far no answers.

If you got an answer now, it would be the wrong answer.

This is wait and see question

Immediate priority is safety and vigilance

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

From this video we can see around 10 armed offloading hostages off the train maybe another 15 or so were in backup.

So how did the army managed to kill 33 ? Are we sure we didn't mislabel hostages as terrorists (going by our track record not out of the ordinary)

That account.....is what exactly?

@RescueRanger

 

[Dalit]

What I'm most interested in now is the response.

Will be have a strong response that we saw from Fmr COAS Gen. Raheel Shareef?

Or are we gonna get more of the same bs "targeted ops" that don't do anything have no real impact.

Are we finally gonna get the government to commit more resources into uplifting the baloch people, so the BLA no longer has a moral leg to stand on?

So many questions, and so far no answers.

I am going to be brutally honest. Don't expect anything. These people don't have the capacity to deal with such a complex problem. Balochistan issue has been lingering for decades. Any mature and serious nation would have resolved this issue amicably. Instead external powers are today filling the vacuum and exploiting the faultlines.

Pakistan is a country where for decades no-go zones exist. Imagine people being used to no-go zones. Balochistan is essentially a no-go zone and the Pakistani people and leaders made it this way. It treated Balochistan like an orphan. Underdeveloped and at the mercy of nasty feudal elements.

Pakistan is a country with a terrible track record of managing conflicts. BD is another conflict that comes to mind. Anyone believing that suddenly after this attack the leaders are awake is in for a rude awakening.

 

[Great Mal]

Their were around 50-70 terrorists involved, many ran off when the attack started some were struck by ucav

For example who do you think was holding the camera from distance

You don't just run off into the distance with the whole apparatus against you, these are bed time stories gobbled by faujeets.

That too in the middle of a hostage situation you dont just scatter off. Our state institution aren't the Holy Gospel neither are the terrorists.

 

[hussain0216]

You don't just run off into the distance with the whole apparatus against you, these are bed time stories gobbled by faujeets.

That too in the middle of a hostage situation you dont just scatter off. Our state institution aren't the Holy Gospel neither are the terrorists.

They were never supposed to put all their terrorists onto the train, that would get them all killed once the military turned up

They are not uniformed, so once they are away from the battle how do you tell who they are?

These people don't have tens of thousands of forces, so once they lose 30-40 it's a big hit for them, they can't afford to lose 50+

 

[Waz]

If you are not willing to go Genghis Khan on the BLA then this will happen again and again. All I see is the same reactionary operation, these filth killed, they regroup and hit a soft target again.
These vile racist, ethnofacist trash have no cause and never did. Mountain by mountain, ravine by ravine you need to go, lead them into a kill zone and then bam. But no, this is just a pipe dream.

 

[That_Guy]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

From this video we can see around 10 armed offloading hostages off the train maybe another 15 or so were in backup.

So how did the army managed to kill 33 ? Are we sure we didn't mislabel hostages as terrorists (going by our track record not out of the ordinary)

Videos don't tend to show everything.

There could be more just off screen or hidden. We know that the BLA were also hiding fighters who were recording the entire thing near by.