Bangladesh: Analyzing Hasina era Adani Power Deal

Back to topic everyone.

This isn't a thread for discussing South Asian immigrants in Western society. If there's nothing new to discuss on topic, I will close this thread.
 
@Hussain bro

IF public contracts are opened for public scrutiny, it's a win win for the common man.

That is a very good idea-good both for the Adanis and the IG. I doubt there would be anything mala fide in the power purchase agreement, still it is best if it is in the open. The merit order ranking of the power suppliers should also be widely advertised so that the public cannot be confused.

Regards
 
@Hussain bro

IF public contracts are opened for public scrutiny, it's a win win for the common man.

That is a very good idea-good both for the Adanis and the IG. I doubt there would be anything mala fide in the power purchase agreement, still it is best if it is in the open. The merit order ranking of the power suppliers should also be widely advertised so that the public cannot be confused.

Regards

It will never be made public because it would humiliate the IG.

But Adani is leaking the details none the less lol

Which is how we were able to prove how good the Adani deal is for BD.

12-14tk Adani power replacing 20+tk Petro power of BD. And reducing pollution to boot!

Simple maths really!!
 
Doesnt look to be that much of a good deal for BD

Adani group's Bangladesh power is supplied from Jharkhand's 1,600 MW power plant. The cost of power is $0.1008 per unit or Tk12 per unit, a Bangladesh Power Development Board official was quoted as saying in the report.
This rate is 27 per cent higher than the rate of India's other private producers and as much as 63 per cent more than the Indian state-owned plants.

 

Billionaire Gautam Adani of India's Adani Group charged in US with bribery, fraud​


According to court records, a judge has issued arrest warrants for Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani, and prosecutors plan to hand those warrants to foreign law enforcement.

By Luc Cohen, Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Gautam Adani, the billionaire chair of Indian conglomerate Adani Group and one of the world's richest people, has been indicted in New York over his role in an alleged multibillion-dollar bribery and fraud scheme, U.S. prosecutors said on Wednesday.

Authorities said Adani and seven other defendants, including his nephew Sagar Adani, agreed to pay about $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials to obtain solar energy supply contracts expected to yield $2 billion of profit over 20 years.

According to an indictment, some conspirators referred privately to Gautam Adami with the code names "Numero uno" and "the big man," while Sagar Adani allegedly used his cellphone to track specifics about the bribes.

Prosecutors also said the Adanis and another executive at Adani Green Energy, Vneet Jaain, raised more than $3 billion in loans and bonds for that company by concealing the corruption from lenders and investors.

The case involves alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a U.S. anti-bribery law.

Adani Group did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours in India, where the charges were announced early Thursday morning.

India's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for the defendants could not immediately be identified.

Gautam Adani, 62, is worth $69.8 billion according to Forbes magazine, making him the world's 22nd richest person and India's second-richest person behind Reliance Industries Chair Mukesh Ambani.

Among the other defendants are Ranjit Gupta and Rupesh Agarwal, respectively a former chief executive and former chief strategy and commercial officer of Azure Power Global, and Cyril Cabanes, a director there.

The other defendants, as well as Cabanes, also worked for a Canadian institutional investor, prosecutors said.
 
So how much Adani paid Hasina or Awami League ?
He got way over his head about “Modi magic “ pulling the same in USA.
 
Last edited:
1732233681440.png

Bangladesh government will form a high-level inquiry committee, consisting of energy and legal experts, to re-examine the country’s power purchase agreement (PPA) with the billionaire Gautam Adani-led Adani Group signed in 2017. The move has been directed by Bangladesh’s high court on Tuesday. A two-judge bench comprising Justice Farah Mahbub and Justice Debasish Roy Chowdhury asked the government to submit the committee’s report within two months, Bangladesh’s news agency UNB reported.

Additionally, the HC ordered the government to submit all documents related to the 25-year deal between the power division and Adani Group in a month’s time.
The HC’s directive came after a writ petition was filed by the country’s Supreme Court lawyer M. Abdul Qaiyum in the public interest. Qaiyum had earlier sent a legal notice to the chairman of Bangladesh power development board (BPDB) and the secretary to the ministry of power and energy and sought reevaluation of the terms of the PPA or cancellation of the deals, the UNB reported.


Why has the Bangladesh-Adani power deal come under scrutiny?

The PPA agreement signed between the Adani Group and Bangladesh’s Awami League government headed by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina required the former to export electricity to the country. The conglomerate had set up the Godda electricity plant in the state of Jharkhand to supply 100 per cent of the power generated by it to the neighbouring country.

Bangladesh is facing hardship in repayment due to the economic crisis. Moreover, reportedly the company sold electricity to Bangladesh at a 27 per cent higher rate than charged by other Indian private producers; this brought the deal to the country’s interim government’s scanner.

The troubles mounted for the country as it was unable to repay debts worth around $800 million for power imports due to the ongoing economic and political crisis, especially after PM Hasina’s resignation. Initially, the company, in a statement, said that the electricity supply won’t be affected due to non-payment of dues. Around the same time, Reuters reported that the company has reduced power supply to the country by nearly 50 per cent from 1,400 MW to around 700-800 MW.

Due to the financial crunch faced by the Group in importing coal required to produce electricity, it gave the Bangladesh government a deadline for repayment of debt. The deadline was till November 7, but followed by a five-day negotiation, it was withdrawn. Last month, the Bangladesh government said that it had paid $96 million to Adani Group.

“Last month, we cleared $96 million, and this month, a letter of credit has been opened for an additional $170 million,” Muhammad Fouzal Kabir Khan told Reuters. Khan is the power and energy adviser in the interim Bangladesh government.

 

How should Bangladesh deal with Adani’s $800m outstanding bill?​


The controversy surrounding Adani's Godda power plant has spread in Bangladesh as well as abroad. The Adani Group has reportedly been requesting the interim government of Bangladesh to clear outstanding dues of around $800 million on their electricity sales. However, given the situation, I believe rather than terminating the Adani contract outright, the Bangladesh government should withhold the payment and commission international experts to conduct a thorough review of the highly controversial agreement with Adani. The current administration is under no obligation to honour agreements made by the ousted government that was elected through a questionable election.

Indian media outlets recently reported two notable stories: the Times of India revealed that Adani had written to Bangladesh Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus regarding the $800 million bill. Another report warned that Bangladesh faces an "unsustainable" $500 million power debt due to Adani's high electricity prices.

These developments underscore that the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) was unable to review the original contract with Adani. Under the directive of the authoritarian Hasina regime, the agreement was signed without review, likely to appease India. This pattern is not unprecedented. In the case of the Rampal coal-fired power plant, engineers from the German technology supplier for the project told me that initial drafts of agreements often contain inflated prices, which are typically subject to multiple rounds of negotiations. However, Bangladesh surprised them by signing the draft without any revisions. This incident is emblematic of how the Awami League government has consistently made agreements that went against Bangladesh's interests, contributing to a massive debt in the power sector.

The flaws in the Adani Godda power plant agreement have been widely documented in international media as well. Tim Buckley, a leading energy expert, told The Washington Post in 2022 that Bangladesh would pay over five times the country's average wholesale electricity price for power from Adani's plant. Even if coal prices revert to pre-Ukraine war levels, Bangladesh would still be paying 33 percent more for Adani's electricity compared to its domestic coal-based power plants. Buckley described this contract as "an absolute gouge" and questioned how any reasonable person could have signed such a detrimental deal on behalf of Bangladesh.

"And the plant may not even be needed: Bangladesh now has 40 percent more power generation capacity than peak demand, according to government figures, thanks to years of investment in coal- and gas-fired power stations… When compared with that of Bangladesh's Kaptai solar farm, Adani's power could be five times as expensive," Buckley said.

The Washington Post report said this power agreement initially appears to be "profitable for both Bangladesh and India," but in reality, it is "very less profitable" for Bangladesh.

Buckley further explained that even if the Godda power plant produces no electricity, Bangladesh would still owe Adani approximately $450 million annually as capacity and maintenance charges. This is considered an exceptionally high figure by global energy standards. A fresh report shows that Adani will receive annual capacity charges of $473.16 million for the power plant; in 25 years, about $11.83 billion will be spent on these charges.

In 2019, Australian Green Party MP Bob Brown launched a website called Adani Watch following protests over the controversial activities of Adani's various entities. On February 9, 2023, Adani Watch released a long report on the Godda power plant deal, which shows that under the current agreement, the price Bangladesh has to pay to buy electricity from Godda is almost three times higher than other power plants in India.

Adani has also reportedly exploited this agreement to inflate profits. Despite benefiting from tax exemptions in India, Adani continues to charge higher rates for the power supplied to Bangladesh, withholding information about these exemptions.

Adani has been exempted from duty and all kinds of taxes on coal import for the power plant. Also, the company does not have to pay any kind of Goods and Services Tax (GST), surcharge or any other duty-tax. According to sources, if the power plant runs at full capacity, it will require seven to nine million metric tonnes of coal annually. As a result, Adani is getting $200 million in duty-tax exemption only on coal imports.

According to the information, Adani was supposed to pay 12.5 percent custom duty and excise duty on power plant equipment, 15 percent service tax on construction works, two percent central sales tax on purchase of goods from outside Jharkhand, 15 percent composite tax on 40 percent of the contractor's bills, 5.5 percent VAT, one percent welfare tax for construction workers, four percent contract tax, water consumption charges, and income tax to the state government of Jharkhand. But these duties and taxes have been waived. However, Adani is not giving any concession to Bangladesh in the sale of electricity.

According to Adani Watch, India's union government charges 400 rupees ($4.88) as Clean Energy Cess (a form of carbon tax) for every tonne of coal. According to the final Environmental Impact Assessment filed by APL to the Ministry of Environment, the plant will consume anywhere between seven and nine million tonnes of coal annually for its proposed PPA period of 25 years. If the figure is taken at eight million tonnes per annum, a back-of-the-envelope calculation produces an estimate that APL will save $39.02 million per year on the Clean Energy Cess and nearly $1 billion over 25 years, by virtue of being declared an SEZ. Being in an SEZ, Adani Power (Jharkhand) Ltd will get 100 percent income tax exemption for the first five years, 50 percent for next five years thereafter, and 50 percent of the ploughed back export profit for next five years.

Adani is also accused of price manipulation by purchasing low-grade coal while charging Bangladesh for high-grade prices, as the Financial Times reported. This has led to Bangladesh paying at least 30 percent above the international market rates. According to a 2018 IEEFA report, the country will have to spend an additional Tk 70,000 crore over 25 years to buy power from Adani Group.

Given the overwhelming evidence that this contract is detrimental to Bangladesh, I believe it is imperative that the agreement be reviewed rather than immediately cancelled. There is no justification for taking out new foreign loans to pay Adani in full under the current terms. Instead, at most, 25 percent of the outstanding bills should be settled while the review process is underway.

However, if Gautam Adani refuses to renegotiate the terms of the contract, Bangladesh may need to consider political action to terminate the agreement.

This approach is supported by critics within India itself, where opposition leader Rahul Gandhi questioned the contract in parliament, citing the close relationship between Prime Minister Modi's foreign policy and his favouritism toward Adani. Gandhi pointed out that Adani secured the 1,500MW contract shortly after Modi's visit to Bangladesh.

Prominent Indian intellectuals have also criticised the deal, with Paranjoy Guha Thakurta stating that Adani's Godda contract has "pushed Bangladesh into a ditch." Al Jazeera reported on the growing international concern, describing Bangladesh as being in the "hot seat" over the Adani power deal.

The existing evidence suggests that Bangladesh has valid grounds to demand a review of the Adani contract. The government must show resolve in protecting national interests, with no reason to fear repercussions for standing firm on an unfair agreement.

 
@LeonBlack08

with Paranjoy Guha Thakurta stating that Adani's Godda contract has "pushed Bangladesh into a ditch."

I am afraid, rescinding the contract will land BD into an even worse ditch now, at least until the Rooppur nuke plant goes full load.

Regards
 
@LeonBlack08

with Paranjoy Guha Thakurta stating that Adani's Godda contract has "pushed Bangladesh into a ditch."

I am afraid, rescinding the contract will land BD into an even worse ditch now, at least until the Rooppur nuke plant goes full load.

Regards

In short term - I agree. Since they haven't been operating the local coal plants to their max capacity. None of the coal plants operated in their max efficiency to date, which has increased their avg cost/kwh. This is why the 12 tk/kwh cost of Adani comparison doesn't show the real picture.

"During the said period, Adani's plant load factor (PLF) or usage of the plant capacity was 90% while Payra and Rampal's PLF was only 60% and 34%. Shortage of coal obstructed Payra and Rampal to generate electricity at highest capacity."


As a result of the local plants sitting idle - Adani now provide 10% of total national demand. This is why we saw IG paid the bill to continue receiving power.

But once the government is able to get the payra, rampal and Bashkhali plant along with Rooppur coming online - then the equation changes.

Also if they are to cancel contract with Adani, it won't be just over cost/kwh, they will look into other factors such as capacity charges and also any provision that would require payment to terminate, making termination very expensive - things the general public is not privy to at this time. Which is why Govt. is probing corruption to get out of the contract by means of force majure.
 
If they have a case then try to marge it with other international case for better traction, I am not sure if it is even going to work.
 
@LeonBlack08

None of the coal plants operated in their max efficiency to date, which has increased their avg cost/kwh. This is why the 12 tk/kwh cost of Adani comparison doesn't show the real picture.

What stops GoBD from shutting down its oil fire plants and using the cash spent on FO to purchase coal for the stranded coal based power plants?

Regards
 
@LeonBlack08

None of the coal plants operated in their max efficiency to date, which has increased their avg cost/kwh. This is why the 12 tk/kwh cost of Adani comparison doesn't show the real picture.

What stops GoBD from shutting down its oil fire plants and using the cash spent on FO to purchase coal for the stranded coal based power plants?

Regards

Good question. Hence the review of all Hasina era power deals.

Most of the oil based ones have unreasonable capacity charge embedded in them and perhaps other unfair clauses which makes makes termination very expensive. This was by design to help the corrupt BAL oligarchs get richer. That could be one reason if I am to take a guess.
 
@LeonBlack08

For once, I agree with your post (the last one) wholeheartedly. As a long time energy analyst I adhere to the principle that the plants which have the lowest variable cost should have first priority on power sales. Those which don't meet the criteria should get capacity charges and nothing more,

Regards
 
Also if they are to cancel contract with Adani, it won't be just over cost/kwh, they will look into other factors such as capacity charges and also any provision that would require payment to terminate, making termination very expensive - things the general public is not privy to at this time. Which is why Govt. is probing corruption to get out of the contract by means of force majure.

Yep, must have a corruption investigation and a ruling from court with decisive proof. Then it can be cancelled. If they take it to international court same corruption can be proved.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top