Bangladesh - Foreign Investment Discussion Thread

View attachment 175938


Bangladesh lags behind competing countries in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI). The situation has worsened further since the political transition.

The interim government created a stir by flying in young banker Ashik Chowdhury from Singapore to appoint him to the top post at the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA).

However, despite generating attention in other areas, Ashik Chowdhury has failed to make an impact in attracting foreign investment over the past 16 months.

The interim government has restored a degree of stability to the financial sector, which had reached the brink during the tenure of the ousted Awami League government. The decline in foreign currency reserves has also been checked.

However, the investment climate has not improved to a satisfactory level. Instead, new foreign investment has declined. The rate of registration of domestic and foreign investment proposals has also fallen. Many small, medium and large factories have shut down, resulting in millions of people losing their jobs.


Private sector investment as a share of GDP stood at 23.51 per cent in fiscal year 2023–24. In fiscal year 2024–25, the rate fell to 22.48 per cent. Capital machinery imports amounted to USD 2.81 billion this year, which is 19 per cent lower than the previous year.

Credit growth in the private sector has also remained below 7 per cent for six consecutive months, whereas growth in this area was more than 10 per cent even in the final month of the ousted government.

Rupali Haque Chowdhury, President, FICCI
Mustafizur Rahman, distinguished fellow of the private research organisation Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), told Prothom Alo that new investment stalls if problems arise in any area related to investment. Many entrepreneurs may have obtained land at low cost, but they are not receiving quality electricity or gas in line with demand. High bank interest rates and overall business costs have also not seen major changes. As a result, no improvement is being seen in terms of investment.

Mustafizur Rahman also said that the interim government has taken some steps, but a major plan was needed to resolve the gas crisis. He said that digitising institutions where businesses have to go in person to receive services would have reduced harassment. He also commented that initiatives were needed to cut the time required for loading and unloading goods at Chittagong Port.

New investments decline​

Although net FDI has increased, new investment inflows have declined. The situation has reached a point where new investment is lower than even during the Covid period. While Bangladesh is facing a drought in FDI, competing countries continue to attract investment.
According to Bangladesh Bank data, net foreign investment amounted to USD 1.42 billion in fiscal year 2023–24. In the outgoing fiscal year, it rose by 19 per cent to USD1.69 billion. Net FDI increased mainly due to reinvestment of profits earned from existing operations of foreign companies and higher borrowing from affiliate companies. In contrast, new investment, or equity capital, declined.

In the outgoing fiscal year 2024–25, new foreign investment amounted to USD 550 million, the lowest in the past five years. This represents a decline of nearly 17 per cent compared to the previous year. During the Covid period, new investment stood at USD 720 million in fiscal year 2020–21. It rose to USD 1.14 billion the following year. In fiscal years 2022–23 and 2023–24, new investment amounted to USD 710 million and USD 670 million respectively.

While Bangladesh has struggled, India, Vietnam and Indonesia have continued to attract substantial FDI each year. Even Pakistan has received more than Bangladesh. Although two years ago the country was behind Bangladesh in attracting FDI.
According to the latest World Bank data, Bangladesh received USD 1.53 billion in FDI in 2024. In the same year, India attracted USD 27 billion, Indonesia USD 21 billion, and Vietnam USD 20 billion.

Among these countries, Vietnam’s FDI has increased for three consecutive years. Meanwhile, Bangladesh had received USD 1.63 billion in FDI in 2022, while Pakistan received USD 1.46 billion. The following year, Pakistan surpassed Bangladesh. In 2024, Bangladesh received USD 1.5 billion in FDI, whereas Pakistan received USD 1 billion more than Bangladesh.

Ashik Chowdhury, Executive Chairman, BIDA

No improvement in investment climate​

In August 2024, following the political transition, Ashik Chowdhury, who was serving as associate director of the Real Estate Finance Division at multinational The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) in Singapore, was appointed chairman of BIDA. At the same time, he was also given the responsibility of executive chairman of the Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority (BEZA). In April last year, BIDA chairman Ashik Chowdhury was accorded the rank of state minister.

A month after assuming office, Ashik Chowdhury said at an event that he had spoken to 235 chief executives and officials of domestic and foreign companies to understand entrepreneurs’ problems.

Investors expressed that they want policy continuity and accurate information on asset availability. They are also concerned about corruption. At that time, he said he was keen to remove all business obstacles and develop the investment climate with transparency and accountability.
Despite promises to improve the business environment, little has actually been achieved. In October, the Bangladesh Business Climax Index (BBX) for fiscal year 2024–25 was published, which stated that there has been no significant improvement in Bangladesh’s business climate.

On the contrary, over the past year, six indicators—access to legal information, infrastructure facilities, labour regulation, trade facilitation, technology adoption, and environmental control and standards—have deteriorated.

Businesspeople from various sectors say that corruption and mismanagement remain as before. Gas and electricity shortages have increased. Loan interest rates have reached 14–15 per cent. Charges at Chattogram port have risen. Companies are burdened with advance income tax and withholding tax.

With little improvement in the domestic business environment and global challenges growing day by day, they are struggling more to sustain existing businesses than to attract new investment.

When asked, Rupali Haque Chowdhury, president of the Foreign Investors’ Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), told Prothom Alo that the government is developing several economic zones, and many investors have taken land there.

However, these zones are not yet ready. Revenue policies are not investment-friendly, and gas and electricity prices are high. Moreover, no one will invest under the current political situation. She added that Bangladesh’s competing countries are not sitting idle.

BIDA Executive Chairman Ashik Chowdhury.

BIDA Executive Chairman Ashik Chowdhury.File Photo

No investment breakthrough under Ashik​

After assuming his responsibilities, Ashik Chowdhury had told Prothom Alo in an interview that “from the beginning of next year (2025), significant improvement in new investment inflows will be seen.”

However, that has not materialised. According to the Bangladesh Economic Survey 2025, in fiscal year 2024–25, investment proposals worth Tk 660 billion in the private sector were registered with BIDA, nearly 58 per cent less than the previous year. During the Covid period, in fiscal year 2019–20, investment proposals worth Tk 1.05 trillion had been registered.

In the outgoing fiscal year, investment proposals worth USD 140 billion from foreign sources were registered. In the previous year, USD 320 billion had been registered. This means foreign investment proposals declined by nearly 56 per cent in the outgoing fiscal year. Meanwhile, domestic investment proposals worth USD 520 billion were registered last fiscal year. In the previous year, USD 1.24 trillion in domestic investment had been registered.

Ashik Chowdhury held a four-day investment conference last April to attract investment. The opening ceremony of the conference, and his presentation, generated considerable discussion on social media. In the end, investment proposals worth only USD 31 billion were received at the conference.

Apart from holding investment conference in the country, Ashik Chowdhury also visited several countries officially. However, no effective results have been seen, and in fact FDI from several countries has declined.
In March last year, the bida executive chairman visited the UK to attract investment. During the visit, he held meetings with government officials as well as British companies and expatriate Bangladeshis. However, FDI from the country amounted to USD 300 million in the last fiscal year. In the preceding year, FDI from the UK stood at USD 510 million. This represents a 41 per cent decline in FDI from that country.

Masrur Reaz, Chairman, Policy Exchange Bangladesh
In January last year, the BIDA executive chairman visited the USA. In the outgoing fiscal year, more investment was repatriated than what arrived from the USA. This means net FDI plummeted by 131 per cent. In March last year, the chief adviser visited Beijing. Three months later, Ashik Chowdhury visited the country. Nevertheless, FDI inflows from the country declined by approximately 3 per cent in the last fiscal year.

Apart from holding investment conference in the country, Ashik Chowdhury also visited several countries officially. However, no effective results have been seen, and in fact FDI from several countries has declined.

In March last year, the bida executive chairman visited the UK to attract investment. During the visit, he held meetings with government officials as well as British companies and expatriate Bangladeshis. However, FDI from the country amounted to USD 300 million in the last fiscal year.
In the preceding year, FDI from the UK stood at USD 510 million. This represents a 41 per cent decline in FDI from that country. In January last year, the BIDA executive chairman visited the USA. In the outgoing fiscal year, more investment was repatriated than what arrived from the USA.

This means net FDI plummeted by 131 per cent. In March last year, the chief adviser visited Beijing. Three months later, Ashik Chowdhury visited the country. Nevertheless, FDI inflows from the country declined by approximately 3 per cent in the last fiscal year.

Ashik Chowdhury skydives in between his professional commitments. On 25 May 2024, he secured a world record by leaping from an aircraft at an altitude of 41,795 feet in Memphis, USA. To commemorate the 54th anniversary of victory, 54 paratroopers skydived while brandishing the national flag on 16 December as part of a special government initiative. Ashik Chowdhury was amongst them. This feat has since been enshrined in the Guinness World Records.

When approached for comment, the BIDA executive chairman Ashik Chowdhury told Prothom Alo on 19 January, “Investment growth typically turns negative or grinds to a halt following a mass uprising. However, in our country, the opposite has occurred, with figures actually rising. It is something of a miracle.
BIDA Executive Chairman Ashik Chowdhury inspects various project sites at Chattogram port on 8 May 2025.

BIDA Executive Chairman Ashik Chowdhury inspects various project sites at Chattogram port on 8 May 2025.File Photo
As a foreign investor, having witnessed the events of 2024, why would anyone choose to invest in 2025? The nation's trajectory remained shrouded in uncertainty. Yet, investment has increased nonetheless. This suggests that investors harbour no doubts regarding the country's potential. The primary concern now is whether we can cultivate a suitable environment for them.”

Courageous Reforms Required​

Business leaders across various sectors contend that the interim government has failed to implement any significant reforms over the past year and a half to improve the investment climate.

Furthermore, the pace of ongoing commerce remains sluggish due to a myriad of factors, including the failure to bring the law and order situation to a satisfactory level, high inflation, gas and power crises, and elevated interest rates. Consequently, fresh investment in the country has stagnated.

When approached for comment, Masrur Reaz, chairman of the private research organisation Policy Exchange Bangladesh, told Prothom Alo that the interim government had prioritised reform upon assuming office.

Initially, it adopted distinctive measures, such as appointing an individual from outside the bureaucracy as the BIDA executive chairman. We had anticipated courageous reforms to bolster the business and investment environment; however, no substantial progress has been observed over the last eighteen months. The reforms that have materialised are merely piecemeal and largely insignificant

Please include the source of your article.
 
Yeah mate, we have been hearing for years our RMG sector is just about to dry out/loose competitiveness to India at many junctures. It hasn't happened yet. When it happens if it happens we will talk then. Otherwise cow doesn't die from vulture's curse.
Our RMG sector is thriving only because of low cost labor and the tariff benefits we enjoy in both the USA and the EU.

But if you think we’re gonna compete in the global market without cutting a deal with the EU to keep enjoying preferential treatment, you’re living in a fool’s paradise.

I blame Hasina for this mess too—she failed to build any other industries beyond ready made garments.
 
Yeah mate, we have been hearing for years our RMG sector is just about to dry out/loose competitiveness to India at many junctures. It hasn't happened yet. When it happens if it happens we will talk then. Otherwise cow doesn't die from vulture's curse.
It's not a doom and gloom scenario ASAP, I'm just pointing out that there's competition in that domain now. Also the FTA is still a year away.

You would do well to diversify your economy.
 
[Trying to post again. Lost track due to thread change. LOL].

Your post is based on a potentially false foundation that the Americans care about 'Christianity' and even put much faith in a resource starved, geopolitically peripheral, poor country like Bangladesh. On top of that, there is Pakistan enough to throw a few $billions to destabilize India.
Nah, I think while there are gains for Pakistan and China to see MuYu replace Hasina this appears like BD's internal politics, just like when the Rajapaksha oligarchy in Sri Lanka was replaced. I guess people have the 'incumbent fatigue' globally unless you are a North Korea or Russia! ;)
 
Ram ram ji,

The Bangladesh economy has structural issues in its exports being overly dependent on a sector where the main competitive advantage has been a transient tariff advantage that is now disappearing. It is also facing global trade headwinds. While political turmoil and violence has exacerbated the situation, Yunus Sahab can hardly be held solely responsible for the situation Bangladesh is in.
 
It's not a doom and gloom scenario ASAP, I'm just pointing out that there's competition in that domain now.

You would do well to diversify your economy.

Yes, I understand that we don't produce cotton. But even after all these years, we still heavily depend on India and China for high-quality fabric. Bangladesh is a major garments hub without a sustained textile and chemical industry that can support the garments sector with locally made dyeing chemicals and high-quality fabrics.

India will definitely remain ahead in this regard and can cash in on this opportunity, as they are one of the biggest cotton producers with a sustained textile industry that can produce high-quality fabrics at an affordable cost.
 
Not that I wish any ill for our Bangladeshi friends but I think Modi's govt missed a trick wrt textiles industry. We have already seen how a modest amount of subsidy in the form of PLIs has given a disproportionate boost to our smartphone markets. A similar amount of subsidy and well targeted incentives could have really boosted our RMG and leather goods segment (both natural and manmade textiles/leather footwear). This would have been more important for our employment creation rather than the CAD/forex.

Regards

@Sam6536 @Prince_ @sentry
 
Not that I wish any ill for our Bangladeshi friends but I think Modi's govt missed a trick wrt textiles industry. We have already seen how a modest amount of subsidy in the form of PLIs has given a disproportionate boost to our smartphone markets. A similar amount of subsidy and well targeted incentives could have really boosted our RMG and leather goods segment (both natural and manmade textiles/leather footwear). This would have been more important for our employment creation rather than the CAD/forex.

Regards

@Sam6536 @Prince_ @sentry
It will be done now given we were disadvantaged because of tariff situation. India is now through FTA's negotiating opening up labor incentive sectors. These deals.are actually be more important than any incentive that GOI can give.
 
Right.
I am sad to see BD's financial stress these days--no Pakistani takes joy in BD's problems. But I am not surprised at all if the OP is correct. Every place I have seen 'revolutions' or violent overthrow of govt I have seen even worse conditions after the initial success. BD was suffering a lot due to Hasina-Khalida long rivalry, just as Pakistan fell behind due to Nawaz-Benazir long rivalry.
I don't at all like Hasina but it seems she had stabilized the situation and propelled BD; what was required was stability, focus and continuity of policies and she did that. And based on BD under her and based on India's stability and liberalization since the early 90s, I have formed my own political path forward for Pakistan and I am not shy to express those here.
Best of luck to BD!

If only you had factual understanding of BD's internal politics and economics and state apparatus during Hassina era and post Hassina era, you would have had different conclusions. None of the things you claim she did, matches reality. Whatever progress BD made in last 15 years (which is very little) is despite of her, not because of her.

I mean, what does it even mean she stabilized the country? One could technically say, Kim Jong un has also stabilised North Korea. Doesn't mean it is good. Only thing Hassina propelled BD into is total breakdown of state institutions and corruption at scale second to none. That is without even mentioning the gross human right violation and other terrible things she did.

All the macro indicators are positive under IG compared to the chaos she left us in.
 
I mean, what does it even mean she stabilized the country? One could technically say, Kim Jong un has also stabilised North Korea. Doesn't mean it is good. Only thing Hassina propelled BD into is total breakdown of state institutions and corruption at scale second to none. That is without even mentioning the gross human right violation and other terrible things she did.
All the macro indicators are positive under IG compared to the chaos she left us in.

Firstly, I must confess I don't follow BD much. I have generally best wishes for BD, regardless of who rules there.
But from the 'visuals' I have seen and the general economic news, the BD during Hasina looks better much than the BD pre Hasina. As I said, I am not fan of Hasina: She appears like a vindictive, cruel person to have hanged old people from a decades old 1971 conflict, but it appears her rule significantly helped BD. BTW, I don't give much of consideration to the typical third-world corruption--neither in BD, nor in India, nor in Pakistan. The worst corruption, in my understanding, is political chaos, the anarchy, the fake 'revolutions', and thus posts here about the path forward for Pakistan reflect that.
As to North Korea, it is much more livable country than many so-called 'democratic' countries, but that's for another debate.
 
@Meengla sb

As to North Korea, it is much more livable country than many so-called 'democratic' countries,

As long as one can keep his mouth shut, which doesn't suit us desis too much.

but that's for another debate.

That is one commodity which must be avoided at all cost in DPRK.

Regards
 
but it appears her rule significantly helped BD.
Exactly. it appears but it isn't. Fascist BAL paid extra attention to cosmetic appearance and propaganda of their hyper corruption ridden mega projects with the help of indian media. Thats it. Some of those mega projects are pure white elephant prestige projects for looting. For example Karnaphuli Tunnel.
.
Fascists destroyed our banking sector, our government institutions, our economic foundation.
.
In fascist era, we were forced to purchase 1 kilo green chili for 1200 taka, under D. Yunus it never crossed 150 taka. In fascist era, 1 kilo potato was 100 taka, under D. Yunus 1 kilo potato rarely crossed 20 taka. And most importantly in fascist era we were forced to buy india onion for 100-300 taka per kilo (price fluctuated), under D. Yunus we are purchasing our local deshi onion for 50-100 taka per kilo.
.
D. Yunus gave us a necessary reboot. Next government will get a good foundation to build on...
 
Get lost, idiot. Even if you had a single f##king brain cell, I might’ve bothered refuting your pathetic point. Keep sucking that special dark place of your US appointed masters where the sun doesn’t shine — while they keep destroying every single sector in the country — instead of trying to get my attention. U aren't worthy of it.
lol yes, licking Indian ass is very high IQ, dumbass.

Why don’t you get lost, every single time you bring in India and praise them, that’s very high IQ sarrr.

Go and be an Indian, bangaboltu mujib supporter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top