Asfandyar Bhittani
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
I knew this would be the case but glad this is spelled out. Countries like Bangladesh which has no airforce or Syria which has no military (unless you call militants in uniform military) should not be included until they invest in the military.However, Fidan stressed that there were “some conditions, rules and standards”, adding that the alliance’s nature was such that it was “expected to expand”.
Also, countries like Iran, which have attacked two of the member states directly (Pakistan even before these wars) and attacked third (Turkey) but rejected responsibility.
It also armed rebel factions in Yemen against Yemeni govt and by extension their Saudi allies. It also based India in chabahar in Sistan Balochistan.
There would need to be a tectonic shift in Iranian security policy to be even considered
It would be better if the MDA focuses on countries like Egypt, or even Qatar ( but their fitna making tendencies could become a liability).
These rest should only be allowed on Major non-NATO ally pattern. Where they aren't members but MDA could choose to back them with weapons sales or transfers to have influence in certain sectors like Sudan, somalia, Yemen, Syria, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Libya, ......





