Bangladesh Socio-Political Crisis 2024 and onwards

He has emotional damage lol

He probably changed his statement 6-7 times now.View attachment 58769
Emotional damage?
Did you mean mental damage?
Does he realise that statements like his, at a time like this, only exacerbates people?

[I don't use words like 'exacerbates' normally. This isn't normal.]
 
@LeonBlack08 @Afif @Joe Shearer

Look at the post above. The video is in Bangla and no caption is available. The video has been available only for an hour.

Yet, this "Turkish ottoman" guy summarizes it and posts it. This fraud is a Bangladeshi, I have been saying for a long time.
I always thought (from the older forum as well) that he was self evidently Pakistani. I'm surprised to learn he is Bangladeshi - then again, he is probably one of those who identify themselves as "East Pakistani", as another poster mentioned.
 
Some of us know who he is; @Nilgiri actually recalled his original PDF id, that I was unable to.

The point is that he is a Bangladeshi, and goes through this role play. There are different reactions to it, as the actual Turks are not very pleased about it.

As far as I am concerned, he is welcome to project himself as he wishes, and as long as he keeps to the forum rules, nobody will interfere.
Isn't it against forum rules to false flag? And how did such an obvious pretender get the "think tank analyst" badge? Wait, I know the answer to that one - being virulently anti-Indian goes a long way.

I do wonder at the mentality of people who have to pretend to be another nationality - what sort of inferiority complex drives that behavior.
 
@LeonBlack08 @Afif @Joe Shearer

Look at the post above. The video is in Bangla and no caption is available. The video has been available only for an hour.

Yet, this "Turkish ottoman" guy summarizes it and posts it. This fraud is a Bangladeshi, I have been saying for a long time.

Hakikat is a troll but good one
It is inevitable that RAW will be wiped out.

I have always said that India has zero hold over Bangladesh.

The only kingmaker in Bangladesh is China.

Hasina was overthrown because she lost China.

Anyway, BAL is finished as a political force.

They have lost the under 35s. Which means they have zero chance until the millennials and Gen Z die out.

The problem is that India is extremist hindutva regime and Modi is trying its best to make it 1 party state.

And at the same time it wishes BD to become secular and also pro hindutva India. Bengalis would have been ok with secular India but not hindutva.
 
I always thought (from the older forum as well) that he was self evidently Pakistani. I'm surprised to learn he is Bangladeshi - then again, he is probably one of those who identify themselves as "East Pakistani", as another poster mentioned.
He is, but that's his point of view.

If you look at the posts of more than one member, not all current citizens of Bangladesh are happy about the parting from Pakistan. That is their point of view.
 
He is, but that's his point of view.

If you look at the posts of more than one member, not all current citizens of Bangladesh are happy about the parting from Pakistan. That is their point of view.


Extremely fringe view that history has shown was the wrong one to have held..

BD and Pakistan was never a viable state and the only regret was the separation was not peaceful.

Even if Mujib had been allowed to be PM in 1971, he would have laid the groundwork for separation probably within 10 years as the territorial discontiguity and the absolute difference in cultures are too great between the two sides.

Anyway, I would like everyone to have to reveal their real backgrounds here and have flags and/or other information on their avatar, as otherwise it is more difficult to have a proper conversation with people whose background is either unknown or thought to be something else from reality.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it against forum rules to false flag? And how did such an obvious pretender get the "think tank analyst" badge? Wait, I know the answer to that one - being virulently anti-Indian goes a long way.


This is a very unfair post. Don't blame you for writing it, but it is not reflective of the great deal of thought and consideration that goes into each decision. It is a very OPEN administration, even though there are lazy people like me involved.


First, he isn't false flagging. He was physically in Turkey for some time.

Second, we go by people's declaration and their location; the two have to coincide. At that point, we do not know about citizenship, and we do not go by that, as there are many shades and variations in citizenship status.

Third, about the Think Tank Analyst. That status was based on good posts he had written, and, incidentally, none of them were 'virulently anti-Indian', as that is something that the Indian representation within administration are not slow to point out.

Again, it has to do with variations; there are so many shades of feeling towards India, ranging from the strong support and admiration of our ability to surmount bigotry and return to fundamental democratic principle, to the bitterly antagonistic on social and political grounds, right to the extreme edge, the green RSS/BJP equivalent, that hates India and Indians for theological reasons.

Does anyone seriously think that this forum will acknowledge only those who are favourably inclined to India? On either a personal or a national plane?

I do wonder at the mentality of people who have to pretend to be another nationality - what sort of inferiority complex drives that behavior.
There are all sorts.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that India is extremist hindutva regime and Modi is trying its best to make it 1 party state.
Is that right?
Hadn't noticed. ;)

And at the same time it wishes BD to become secular and also pro hindutva India. Bengalis would have been ok with secular India but not hindutva.
Bangladesh is far more secular than people imagine. Certainly more than the vilification of our Sanghi leadership.
 
Extremely fringe view that history has shown was the wrong one to have held..

BD and Pakistan was never a viable state and the only regret was the separation was not peaceful.
I cannot help remembering the Sarat Bose - Kiran Shankar Rai - Suhrawardy pact (Kiran Shankar Rai being a distant kinsman), that was aborted by the fierce opposition of Syama Prasad, who went straight up to the Congress High Command, although he was himself a known political opponent and had formed a ministry in Bengal opposed to the Congress, in alliance with Sher-e-Bangal, and insisted on partition.
 
Anyway, I would like everyone to have to reveal their real backgrounds here and have flags and/or other information on their avatar, as otherwise it is more difficult to have an proper conversation with people whose background is either unknown or thought to be something else from reality.
This is absolutely the view of the entire administration, as we have observed from the internal conversations.

This particular case was complicated.
 
Congrats to Bangladeshis for their success, hopefully it will not be "Asman se gira, khajoor mai atka" instead their struggle will bring more prosperity. Hopefully we'll have better relation with them once we get ride of khaki duffers.
 
Congrats to Bangladeshis for their success, hopefully it will not be "Asman se gira, khajoor mai atka" instead their struggle will bring more prosperity. Hopefully we'll have better relation with them once we get ride of khaki duffers.



Thank you for your kind words.

There is absolutely no reason that BD cannot have good relations with both India and Pakistan.

Hasina had this weird pathological hatred of Pakistan which most BD'shis do not.

Her fondness of India can be understood in terms of her family's relations with them over many decades but she allowed her personal connections to cloud some of her political decisions she made over the last 15 years. That was one of the reasons she lost the support of the BD population.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top