Bangladesh: Two Soldiers Killed in Tank Firing Accident in Chattogram


2. Bangldesh army used the new munition on a tank that has no containerization of tank rounds, no separate compartment and directly blame the munitions ?

3. Tank is as old as Bangladesh indepence

4. No matter the Chinese upgrades its not 3rd or 4th gen tank so dont expect Chinese could do much with this.

5. Pakistan has been using these same rounds for years and there was no issue with it

6. POF successfully exports tank rounds and conventional artillery to over 40 countries across the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and the Far East. International militaries procure these rounds because they offer premium heavy-armor penetration at a fraction of the cost of European or American alternatives. The only drawback is its weaker penetration then EU or American alternatives.

7. The Reality of "Bore Prematures": When a tank barrel ruptures or explodes internally mid-fire, it is technically known as a barrel burst or bore premature. In professional militaries, it means barrel life ended but was used anyway.​

This isn't bore premature.

Seems like the probable cause was 'back flash", wherein when a shell is fired, some of the heat energy (in the form of a bright hot flash) escapes back through the breech.....it normally burns soldiers inside the turret and cooks off any ammo stored there.....such incidents are common not due to old vintage of ammo, but mainly due to improperly-made ammo casings and shell base (manufacturer fault).

But we don't know if it a Pak or Chinese ammo. Form new batches procured few years ago or the old ones now being spent for training.
 
No hard feelings, but if these guys are so upset about the ammunition/shells that they have to write long posts specifically to target Pakistani standards, then they should simply stop buying from Pakistan and rather go buy from India or China. If the ammunition/shell quality was really poor, then we might have seen such incidents happening in Pakistan as well during the war on terror ops on the Western border. Similar case happened during the Thailand-Cambodian war where Chinese VT-4 tank barrels were exploding, yet no body could come up with proper evidence as to the root cause.
The root cause was because they were using tanks as howitzers which it is not designed for
 
BD can go for 150-200 VT-4 from China to reolace all of its current old tanks. It is a good and modern tank. Cheap as well.
BD evaluated VT 4 but opted for VT5 because of it being lightweight. We have about 50 of them in service.
 
BD evaluated VT 4 but opted for VT5 because of it being lightweight. We have about 50 of them in service.

I was aware of the bangladesh operating VT5. But it is a light tank. VT4 i believe is the real deal.

But I guess due to bangladesh local conditions, excessive rain, monsoon etc. You may have decided vt5 makes more sense.

But if BD decided on VT5 and already have 50, why not make it 200 and just retire all these relics from 1980s.
 
I was aware of the bangladesh operating VT5. But it is a light tank. VT4 i believe is the real deal.

But I guess due to bangladesh local conditions, excessive rain, monsoon etc. You may have decided vt5 makes more sense.

But if BD decided on VT5 and already have 50, why not make it 200 and just retire all these relics from 1980s.

Yes because of terrain and climate. Apart from Northern sector, not suitable for heavy tank. In monsoon it's even worse.

But Bangladesh does operate about 50 MBT2000s too, that meets the heavy tank requirement.

I think the plan is to adopt VT5 as the primary eventually, but it will be done in phases. These T59s and T69s underwent significant upgrades not too long ago. It remains to be seen if the tank is at fault or the quality of ammo. We need to wait for the official investigation report, but I doubt that will ever be made public.
 
Don't understand why Bangladesh went for that museum pieces of Chinese submarines... this is how rich Nations cheat poor nation. China should have actually retired those submarines but they found a BAKRA in the form of Bangladesh and sold them a junk which can actually endanger the life of Bangladeshi crew....

Do we want to witness Kursk of BOB???

Now many members here will argue that it was not for using in war but only for a training for our navy....

You could have asked for deadly KILOS from your neighbor India and that time we had very very friendly relationship with each other... KILO is still generation ahead of these museum Chinese MINGS and it was Hasina era when Bangladesh economy was showing miracles....

If poor Myanmar could afford it was no big deal for Bangladesh.... Myanmar here showed how to make a right choice....
Thise were given away to bangladesh for free. 200 million that was spent to get them went straight to refit.

India would never arm bangladesh with subs. The only reason they gave away sub to burma was because bangladesh was armed by china.
 
Happened in 2024 too, substandard ammo


bro. India is among the top 3 markets for Chinese ammunition.

"The U.S. and India face a shared munitions vulnerability as both countries lack sufficient stockpiles and rely heavily on fragile, China-linked supply chains.

China has cornered key energetic materials like nitrocellulose and CL-20, making it critical for the U.S. and India to jointly expand explosive and propellant"


Screenshot_2026-09-11-21-26-07-075_com.microsoft.emmx-edit.jpg

 
Last edited:
7. The Reality of "Bore Prematures": When a tank barrel ruptures or explodes internally mid-fire, it is technically known as a barrel burst or bore premature. In professional militaries, it means barrel life ended but was used anyway
Im not gonna blame the ammunition here because there's simply no evidence to support this claim. However given previous such incident occurring with bdr and a worn out gun... im just going to assume this was related to that gun being too old to be in service
 
I was aware of the bangladesh operating VT5. But it is a light tank. VT4 i believe is the real deal.

But I guess due to bangladesh local conditions, excessive rain, monsoon etc. You may have decided vt5 makes more sense.

But if BD decided on VT5 and already have 50, why not make it 200 and just retire all these relics from 1980s.

BD has recieved two regiments (88) VT-5 so far.

Yes because of terrain and climate. Apart from Northern sector, not suitable for heavy tank. In monsoon it's even worse.

But Bangladesh does operate about 50 MBT2000s too, that meets the heavy tank requirement.

I think the plan is to adopt VT5 as the primary eventually, but it will be done in phases. These T59s and T69s underwent significant upgrades not too long ago. It remains to be seen if the tank is at fault or the quality of ammo. We need to wait for the official investigation report, but I doubt that will ever be made public.

The original Plan is for 3 VT-5 regiment under forcegoal2030. These aren't replacement. These armoured regiment are newly raised and didn't had tanks.

I do believe other 7 regiments will likely have MBT. But VT4A1 is not a good fit. It has performance issues. I doubt we will have money for new MBT anyway before 2030.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top